{"title":"双语儿童对相对从句的在线处理","authors":"K. Katsika, Maria Lialiou, Shanley E. M. Allen","doi":"10.1075/lab.22103.kat","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Long-distance dependencies such as relative clauses (RCs) are known to be vulnerable in heritage grammars (e.g.,\n Montrul, 2008). Previous studies in RC comprehension have shown that heritage\n language (HL) children show similar comprehension to monolingual children (Jia & Paradis,\n 2020), while differential performance has also been found (Kidd et al.,\n 2015). The present study investigates 11–13-year-old monolingual and German-dominant HL children’s real-time parsing\n strategies in subject relative clause (SRC) and object relative clause (ORC) processing in Greek. We conducted a self-paced\n listening task in Greek in which we manipulated the type of RC (subject vs. object), and the RC internal word order (canonical vs.\n scrambled). Our analyses revealed no significant group differences between HL and monolingual children. Both groups of children\n processed SRCs faster than ORCs on the critical RC verb segment. We also examined if case-marked pre-verbal NPs would facilitate\n the processing of ORC structures. Although children processed pre-verbal faster than post-verbal NPs, ORC structures with\n pre-verbal NPs received the lowest scores in the grammaticality judgment task. We discuss these findings on the grounds of\n Relativized Minimality (Friedmann et al., 2009) and Fodor and Inoue’s (2000) Diagnosis and Repair Model.","PeriodicalId":48664,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bilingual children’s online processing of relative clauses\",\"authors\":\"K. Katsika, Maria Lialiou, Shanley E. M. Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lab.22103.kat\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Long-distance dependencies such as relative clauses (RCs) are known to be vulnerable in heritage grammars (e.g.,\\n Montrul, 2008). Previous studies in RC comprehension have shown that heritage\\n language (HL) children show similar comprehension to monolingual children (Jia & Paradis,\\n 2020), while differential performance has also been found (Kidd et al.,\\n 2015). The present study investigates 11–13-year-old monolingual and German-dominant HL children’s real-time parsing\\n strategies in subject relative clause (SRC) and object relative clause (ORC) processing in Greek. We conducted a self-paced\\n listening task in Greek in which we manipulated the type of RC (subject vs. object), and the RC internal word order (canonical vs.\\n scrambled). Our analyses revealed no significant group differences between HL and monolingual children. Both groups of children\\n processed SRCs faster than ORCs on the critical RC verb segment. We also examined if case-marked pre-verbal NPs would facilitate\\n the processing of ORC structures. Although children processed pre-verbal faster than post-verbal NPs, ORC structures with\\n pre-verbal NPs received the lowest scores in the grammaticality judgment task. We discuss these findings on the grounds of\\n Relativized Minimality (Friedmann et al., 2009) and Fodor and Inoue’s (2000) Diagnosis and Repair Model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.22103.kat\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.22103.kat","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bilingual children’s online processing of relative clauses
Long-distance dependencies such as relative clauses (RCs) are known to be vulnerable in heritage grammars (e.g.,
Montrul, 2008). Previous studies in RC comprehension have shown that heritage
language (HL) children show similar comprehension to monolingual children (Jia & Paradis,
2020), while differential performance has also been found (Kidd et al.,
2015). The present study investigates 11–13-year-old monolingual and German-dominant HL children’s real-time parsing
strategies in subject relative clause (SRC) and object relative clause (ORC) processing in Greek. We conducted a self-paced
listening task in Greek in which we manipulated the type of RC (subject vs. object), and the RC internal word order (canonical vs.
scrambled). Our analyses revealed no significant group differences between HL and monolingual children. Both groups of children
processed SRCs faster than ORCs on the critical RC verb segment. We also examined if case-marked pre-verbal NPs would facilitate
the processing of ORC structures. Although children processed pre-verbal faster than post-verbal NPs, ORC structures with
pre-verbal NPs received the lowest scores in the grammaticality judgment task. We discuss these findings on the grounds of
Relativized Minimality (Friedmann et al., 2009) and Fodor and Inoue’s (2000) Diagnosis and Repair Model.
期刊介绍:
LAB provides an outlet for cutting-edge, contemporary studies on bilingualism. LAB assumes a broad definition of bilingualism, including: adult L2 acquisition, simultaneous child bilingualism, child L2 acquisition, adult heritage speaker competence, L1 attrition in L2/Ln environments, and adult L3/Ln acquisition. LAB solicits high quality articles of original research assuming any cognitive science approach to understanding the mental representation of bilingual language competence and performance, including cognitive linguistics, emergentism/connectionism, generative theories, psycholinguistic and processing accounts, and covering typical and atypical populations.