生长激素疗法:生长激素缺乏症和小于胎龄儿童的短期和长期疗效比较。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Andreas Gleiss, A. Raimann, Florentina Haufler, D. Ertl, S. Sagmeister, Gabriele Hartmann
{"title":"生长激素疗法:生长激素缺乏症和小于胎龄儿童的短期和长期疗效比较。","authors":"Andreas Gleiss, A. Raimann, Florentina Haufler, D. Ertl, S. Sagmeister, Gabriele Hartmann","doi":"10.1159/000538798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Direct comparisons of both short-term and long-term auxological outcome of growth hormone therapy (GHT) between growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and small for gestational age (SGA) are scarce. Methods 103 patients with GHD and 53 patients with SGA treated at our tertiary center were investigated. Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between these groups using multi-variable linear regression models with adjustment for age, sex and height at therapy start, also allowing for sex-specific group comparisons. Results Mean delta height standard deviation scores (SDS) after 1 year of treatment was significantly higher in GHD (0.90, CI 0.82 to 0.99) compared to SGA (0.67, C I 0.54 to 0.79)(p= 0.003) with no sex difference. As expected, the mean increase in height SDS at final height (FH) was significantly higher in GHD (2.21, CI 2.00 to 2.42) compared to SGA (1.05, CI 0.75 to 1.35)(p<0.001), leading to a target height corrected FH of -0.39 SDS (CI -0.62 to -0.15) in GHD and -1.22 SDS (CI-1.57 to -0.87) in SGA ( p<0.001). Girls with GHD had a better long-term outcome, as did boys with SGA when compared to the respective opposite sex. The cut-off of delta height of 0.5 SDS during the first year had a low sensitivity to detect long-term non-responders. We found a relation between short-term and long-term outcome in GHD, but not in SGA (adjusted R2 = 0.66 vs. 0.01). Conclusion In contrast to GHD, we observed practically no relationship between 1st-year and long-term outcome in SGA patients treated with GH.","PeriodicalId":13025,"journal":{"name":"Hormone Research in Paediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growth hormone therapy: Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between children with Growth Hormone Deficiency and Small for Gestational Age.\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Gleiss, A. Raimann, Florentina Haufler, D. Ertl, S. Sagmeister, Gabriele Hartmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000538798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Direct comparisons of both short-term and long-term auxological outcome of growth hormone therapy (GHT) between growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and small for gestational age (SGA) are scarce. Methods 103 patients with GHD and 53 patients with SGA treated at our tertiary center were investigated. Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between these groups using multi-variable linear regression models with adjustment for age, sex and height at therapy start, also allowing for sex-specific group comparisons. Results Mean delta height standard deviation scores (SDS) after 1 year of treatment was significantly higher in GHD (0.90, CI 0.82 to 0.99) compared to SGA (0.67, C I 0.54 to 0.79)(p= 0.003) with no sex difference. As expected, the mean increase in height SDS at final height (FH) was significantly higher in GHD (2.21, CI 2.00 to 2.42) compared to SGA (1.05, CI 0.75 to 1.35)(p<0.001), leading to a target height corrected FH of -0.39 SDS (CI -0.62 to -0.15) in GHD and -1.22 SDS (CI-1.57 to -0.87) in SGA ( p<0.001). Girls with GHD had a better long-term outcome, as did boys with SGA when compared to the respective opposite sex. The cut-off of delta height of 0.5 SDS during the first year had a low sensitivity to detect long-term non-responders. We found a relation between short-term and long-term outcome in GHD, but not in SGA (adjusted R2 = 0.66 vs. 0.01). Conclusion In contrast to GHD, we observed practically no relationship between 1st-year and long-term outcome in SGA patients treated with GH.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hormone Research in Paediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hormone Research in Paediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538798\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hormone Research in Paediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538798","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:生长激素缺乏症(GHD)和小于胎龄儿(SGA)之间生长激素治疗(GHT)的短期和长期辅助治疗效果的直接比较很少见。方法 调查了在我们的三级中心接受治疗的 103 名 GHD 患者和 53 名 SGA 患者。采用多变量线性回归模型对这两组患者的短期和长期疗效进行了比较,并对开始治疗时的年龄、性别和身高进行了调整,还对特定性别组进行了比较。结果 GHD(0.90,CI 0.82 至 0.99)治疗 1 年后的平均身高标准偏差(SDS)显著高于 SGA(0.67,C I 0.54 至 0.79)(p= 0.003),且无性别差异。不出所料,与 SGA(1.05,CI 0.75 至 1.35)(p<0.001)相比,GHD 最终身高(FH)的平均身高 SDS 增长率(2.21,CI 2.00 至 2.42)明显更高,导致 GHD 的目标身高校正 FH 为 -0.39 SDS(CI -0.62 至 -0.15),SGA 为 -1.22 SDS(CI-1.57 至 -0.87)(p<0.001)。与异性相比,GHD女孩的长期预后较好,SGA男孩也是如此。第一年的身高δ值为 0.5 SDS 时,检测长期无应答者的灵敏度较低。我们发现 GHD 患者的短期结果与长期结果之间存在关系,而 SGA 患者则没有这种关系(调整后的 R2 = 0.66 vs. 0.01)。结论 与 GHD 相反,我们发现接受 GH 治疗的 SGA 患者第一年的疗效与长期疗效之间几乎没有关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Growth hormone therapy: Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between children with Growth Hormone Deficiency and Small for Gestational Age.
Introduction Direct comparisons of both short-term and long-term auxological outcome of growth hormone therapy (GHT) between growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and small for gestational age (SGA) are scarce. Methods 103 patients with GHD and 53 patients with SGA treated at our tertiary center were investigated. Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between these groups using multi-variable linear regression models with adjustment for age, sex and height at therapy start, also allowing for sex-specific group comparisons. Results Mean delta height standard deviation scores (SDS) after 1 year of treatment was significantly higher in GHD (0.90, CI 0.82 to 0.99) compared to SGA (0.67, C I 0.54 to 0.79)(p= 0.003) with no sex difference. As expected, the mean increase in height SDS at final height (FH) was significantly higher in GHD (2.21, CI 2.00 to 2.42) compared to SGA (1.05, CI 0.75 to 1.35)(p<0.001), leading to a target height corrected FH of -0.39 SDS (CI -0.62 to -0.15) in GHD and -1.22 SDS (CI-1.57 to -0.87) in SGA ( p<0.001). Girls with GHD had a better long-term outcome, as did boys with SGA when compared to the respective opposite sex. The cut-off of delta height of 0.5 SDS during the first year had a low sensitivity to detect long-term non-responders. We found a relation between short-term and long-term outcome in GHD, but not in SGA (adjusted R2 = 0.66 vs. 0.01). Conclusion In contrast to GHD, we observed practically no relationship between 1st-year and long-term outcome in SGA patients treated with GH.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hormone Research in Paediatrics
Hormone Research in Paediatrics ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of ''Hormone Research in Paediatrics'' is to improve the care of children with endocrine disorders by promoting basic and clinical knowledge. The journal facilitates the dissemination of information through original papers, mini reviews, clinical guidelines and papers on novel insights from clinical practice. Periodic editorials from outstanding paediatric endocrinologists address the main published novelties by critically reviewing the major strengths and weaknesses of the studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信