用于氨-柴油双燃料燃烧模拟的制表法与复杂化学法的比较

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Dominik Krnac, Bhuvaneswaran Manickam, Peter Holand, Utkarsh Pathak, Valentin Scharl, T. Sattelmayer
{"title":"用于氨-柴油双燃料燃烧模拟的制表法与复杂化学法的比较","authors":"Dominik Krnac, Bhuvaneswaran Manickam, Peter Holand, Utkarsh Pathak, Valentin Scharl, T. Sattelmayer","doi":"10.4271/03-17-07-0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using ammonia as a carbon-free fuel is a promising way to reduce greenhouse gas\n emissions in the maritime sector. Due to the challenging fuel properties, like\n high autoignition temperature, high latent heat of vaporization, and low laminar\n flame speeds, a dual-fuel combustion process is the most promising way to use\n ammonia as a fuel in medium-speed engines.\n\n \nCurrently, many experimental investigations regarding premixed and diffusive\n combustion are carried out. A numerical approach has been employed to simulate\n the complex dual-fuel combustion process to better understand the influences on\n the diffusive combustion of ammonia ignited by a diesel pilot. The simulation\n results are validated based on optical investigations conducted in a rapid\n compression–expansion machine (RCEM). The present work compares a tabulated\n chemistry simulation approach to complex chemistry-based simulations. The\n investigations evaluate the accuracy of both modeling approaches and point out\n the limitations and weaknesses of the tabulated chemistry approach. When using\n two fuels, the tabulated chemistry approach cannot reproduce misfiring events\n due to inherent model limitations. By adjusting the model parameters of the\n tabulated chemistry model, it is possible to reproduce experimental results\n accurately for a specific case. However, using the adjusted parameters for\n simulations with changed injection timing or interaction angle between the\n sprays shows that no predictive calculations are possible. The parameter set is\n only valid for a single operation point.\n\n \nFurther simulations show that the complex chemistry approach can capture the\n complex interaction between both directly injected fuels for different operation\n points. It correctly predicts the ignition as well as heat release. Therefore,\n the approach allows predictive combustion simulations. Furthermore, it\n reproduces the occurrence of misfiring in cases of unsuitable interaction of\n both sprays and injection timing.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Tabulated and Complex Chemistry Approaches for\\n Ammonia–Diesel Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation\",\"authors\":\"Dominik Krnac, Bhuvaneswaran Manickam, Peter Holand, Utkarsh Pathak, Valentin Scharl, T. Sattelmayer\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/03-17-07-0055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using ammonia as a carbon-free fuel is a promising way to reduce greenhouse gas\\n emissions in the maritime sector. Due to the challenging fuel properties, like\\n high autoignition temperature, high latent heat of vaporization, and low laminar\\n flame speeds, a dual-fuel combustion process is the most promising way to use\\n ammonia as a fuel in medium-speed engines.\\n\\n \\nCurrently, many experimental investigations regarding premixed and diffusive\\n combustion are carried out. A numerical approach has been employed to simulate\\n the complex dual-fuel combustion process to better understand the influences on\\n the diffusive combustion of ammonia ignited by a diesel pilot. The simulation\\n results are validated based on optical investigations conducted in a rapid\\n compression–expansion machine (RCEM). The present work compares a tabulated\\n chemistry simulation approach to complex chemistry-based simulations. The\\n investigations evaluate the accuracy of both modeling approaches and point out\\n the limitations and weaknesses of the tabulated chemistry approach. When using\\n two fuels, the tabulated chemistry approach cannot reproduce misfiring events\\n due to inherent model limitations. By adjusting the model parameters of the\\n tabulated chemistry model, it is possible to reproduce experimental results\\n accurately for a specific case. However, using the adjusted parameters for\\n simulations with changed injection timing or interaction angle between the\\n sprays shows that no predictive calculations are possible. The parameter set is\\n only valid for a single operation point.\\n\\n \\nFurther simulations show that the complex chemistry approach can capture the\\n complex interaction between both directly injected fuels for different operation\\n points. It correctly predicts the ignition as well as heat release. Therefore,\\n the approach allows predictive combustion simulations. Furthermore, it\\n reproduces the occurrence of misfiring in cases of unsuitable interaction of\\n both sprays and injection timing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/03-17-07-0055\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/03-17-07-0055","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用氨作为无碳燃料是减少海运业温室气体排放的一种可行方法。由于氨具有高自燃温度、高汽化潜热和低层流火焰速度等挑战性燃料特性,双燃料燃烧过程是在中速发动机中使用氨作为燃料的最有前途的方法。目前,有关预混燃烧和扩散燃烧的实验研究很多。我们采用数值方法模拟了复杂的双燃料燃烧过程,以更好地了解柴油引燃氨扩散燃烧的影响因素。模拟结果根据在快速压缩膨胀机(RCEM)中进行的光学研究进行了验证。本研究将制表化学模拟方法与基于复杂化学的模拟方法进行了比较。调查评估了两种建模方法的准确性,并指出了表格化学方法的局限性和弱点。当使用两种燃料时,由于固有模型的限制,表列化学方法无法再现误点火事件。通过调整制表化学模型的模型参数,可以在特定情况下准确再现实验结果。但是,在改变喷射时间或喷射之间的相互作用角度时,使用调整后的参数进行模拟,则无法进行预测计算。参数集仅对单个操作点有效。进一步的模拟显示,复合化学方法可以捕捉不同工作点两种直接喷射燃料之间的复杂相互作用。它能正确预测点火和热量释放。因此,该方法可以进行预测性燃烧模拟。此外,它还能再现在喷射和喷射时间的相互作用不合适的情况下发生的点火错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Tabulated and Complex Chemistry Approaches for Ammonia–Diesel Dual-Fuel Combustion Simulation
Using ammonia as a carbon-free fuel is a promising way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the maritime sector. Due to the challenging fuel properties, like high autoignition temperature, high latent heat of vaporization, and low laminar flame speeds, a dual-fuel combustion process is the most promising way to use ammonia as a fuel in medium-speed engines. Currently, many experimental investigations regarding premixed and diffusive combustion are carried out. A numerical approach has been employed to simulate the complex dual-fuel combustion process to better understand the influences on the diffusive combustion of ammonia ignited by a diesel pilot. The simulation results are validated based on optical investigations conducted in a rapid compression–expansion machine (RCEM). The present work compares a tabulated chemistry simulation approach to complex chemistry-based simulations. The investigations evaluate the accuracy of both modeling approaches and point out the limitations and weaknesses of the tabulated chemistry approach. When using two fuels, the tabulated chemistry approach cannot reproduce misfiring events due to inherent model limitations. By adjusting the model parameters of the tabulated chemistry model, it is possible to reproduce experimental results accurately for a specific case. However, using the adjusted parameters for simulations with changed injection timing or interaction angle between the sprays shows that no predictive calculations are possible. The parameter set is only valid for a single operation point. Further simulations show that the complex chemistry approach can capture the complex interaction between both directly injected fuels for different operation points. It correctly predicts the ignition as well as heat release. Therefore, the approach allows predictive combustion simulations. Furthermore, it reproduces the occurrence of misfiring in cases of unsuitable interaction of both sprays and injection timing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信