浸润性乳腺癌中雌激素受体、孕激素受体和人表皮生长因子受体 2 的表达率:21 家机构的研究。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Daniel D Mais, Alia N Nazarullah, Anthony J Guidi, Suzanne Dintzis, Barbara J Blond, Thomas A Long, Suzanne N Coulter, Richard W Brown
{"title":"浸润性乳腺癌中雌激素受体、孕激素受体和人表皮生长因子受体 2 的表达率:21 家机构的研究。","authors":"Daniel D Mais, Alia N Nazarullah, Anthony J Guidi, Suzanne Dintzis, Barbara J Blond, Thomas A Long, Suzanne N Coulter, Richard W Brown","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2022-0384-CP","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT.—\nLaboratories performing predictive marker testing for breast carcinoma are encouraged to compare patient results to published benchmarks.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE.—\nTo collect expression rates for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in invasive breast carcinoma from multiple laboratories.\n\n\nDESIGN.—\nParticipants submitted data from up to 50 primary cases during the study period. Participants reported ER, PgR, and HER2 results in addition to demographic and histologic information. Participants also provided annual institution-level expression rates.\n\n\nRESULTS.—\nA total of 21 institutions submitted data for 687 cases. Aggregate positivity rates for ER and PgR were 85.6% and 75.1%, respectively. Receptor positivity rates were higher in well-differentiated (grade 1) tumors (ER, 97.4%; PgR, 88.0%) compared with moderately differentiated (grade 2) tumors (ER, 92.4%; PgR, 84.0%) and poorly differentiated (grade 3) tumors (ER, 61.8%; PgR, 48.0%). Expression rates were higher in postmenopausal women (ER, 87.2%) than premenopausal women (ER, 79.6%) and higher in lobular carcinomas (ER, 98.7%; PgR, 85.3%) than ductal carcinomas (ER, 84.1%; PgR, 74.5%). The aggregate HER2 positivity (score 3+) rate was 9.0%. The aggregate HER2 equivocal (score 2+) rate was 14.5%. Of 81 equivocal (score 2+) cases, 70 (86.4%) were nonamplified.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS.—\nThe data from this study provide multi-institutional benchmark data to assist laboratories performing periodic comparisons as part of a quality management program. Overall expression rates were generally similar to those of other published reports, with the exception of the ER-negative and HER2-positive rates, both of which were somewhat lower.","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Expression Rates in Invasive Breast Carcinoma: A Study of 21 Institutions.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel D Mais, Alia N Nazarullah, Anthony J Guidi, Suzanne Dintzis, Barbara J Blond, Thomas A Long, Suzanne N Coulter, Richard W Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.5858/arpa.2022-0384-CP\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CONTEXT.—\\nLaboratories performing predictive marker testing for breast carcinoma are encouraged to compare patient results to published benchmarks.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVE.—\\nTo collect expression rates for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in invasive breast carcinoma from multiple laboratories.\\n\\n\\nDESIGN.—\\nParticipants submitted data from up to 50 primary cases during the study period. Participants reported ER, PgR, and HER2 results in addition to demographic and histologic information. Participants also provided annual institution-level expression rates.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS.—\\nA total of 21 institutions submitted data for 687 cases. Aggregate positivity rates for ER and PgR were 85.6% and 75.1%, respectively. Receptor positivity rates were higher in well-differentiated (grade 1) tumors (ER, 97.4%; PgR, 88.0%) compared with moderately differentiated (grade 2) tumors (ER, 92.4%; PgR, 84.0%) and poorly differentiated (grade 3) tumors (ER, 61.8%; PgR, 48.0%). Expression rates were higher in postmenopausal women (ER, 87.2%) than premenopausal women (ER, 79.6%) and higher in lobular carcinomas (ER, 98.7%; PgR, 85.3%) than ductal carcinomas (ER, 84.1%; PgR, 74.5%). The aggregate HER2 positivity (score 3+) rate was 9.0%. The aggregate HER2 equivocal (score 2+) rate was 14.5%. Of 81 equivocal (score 2+) cases, 70 (86.4%) were nonamplified.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS.—\\nThe data from this study provide multi-institutional benchmark data to assist laboratories performing periodic comparisons as part of a quality management program. Overall expression rates were generally similar to those of other published reports, with the exception of the ER-negative and HER2-positive rates, both of which were somewhat lower.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2022-0384-CP\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2022-0384-CP","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鼓励对乳腺癌进行预测性标记物检测的实验室将患者的检测结果与已公布的基准进行比较。目的:收集多个实验室的雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PgR)和人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)在浸润性乳腺癌中的表达率。除人口统计学和组织学信息外,参与者还报告了ER、PgR和HER2结果。结果:共有 21 家机构提交了 687 个病例的数据。ER和PgR的总阳性率分别为85.6%和75.1%。与中度分化(2级)肿瘤(ER,92.4%;PgR,84.0%)和分化不良(3级)肿瘤(ER,61.8%;PgR,48.0%)相比,分化良好(1级)肿瘤的受体阳性率更高(ER,97.4%;PgR,88.0%)。绝经后妇女的表达率(ER,87.2%)高于绝经前妇女(ER,79.6%),小叶癌(ER,98.7%;PgR,85.3%)高于导管癌(ER,84.1%;PgR,74.5%)。HER2阳性(3分以上)总比率为9.0%。HER2等位(评分2+)总比率为14.5%。结论:本研究的数据提供了多机构基准数据,有助于实验室进行定期比较,作为质量管理计划的一部分。除ER阴性和HER2阳性率略低外,总体表达率与其他已发表的报告基本相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Expression Rates in Invasive Breast Carcinoma: A Study of 21 Institutions.
CONTEXT.— Laboratories performing predictive marker testing for breast carcinoma are encouraged to compare patient results to published benchmarks. OBJECTIVE.— To collect expression rates for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in invasive breast carcinoma from multiple laboratories. DESIGN.— Participants submitted data from up to 50 primary cases during the study period. Participants reported ER, PgR, and HER2 results in addition to demographic and histologic information. Participants also provided annual institution-level expression rates. RESULTS.— A total of 21 institutions submitted data for 687 cases. Aggregate positivity rates for ER and PgR were 85.6% and 75.1%, respectively. Receptor positivity rates were higher in well-differentiated (grade 1) tumors (ER, 97.4%; PgR, 88.0%) compared with moderately differentiated (grade 2) tumors (ER, 92.4%; PgR, 84.0%) and poorly differentiated (grade 3) tumors (ER, 61.8%; PgR, 48.0%). Expression rates were higher in postmenopausal women (ER, 87.2%) than premenopausal women (ER, 79.6%) and higher in lobular carcinomas (ER, 98.7%; PgR, 85.3%) than ductal carcinomas (ER, 84.1%; PgR, 74.5%). The aggregate HER2 positivity (score 3+) rate was 9.0%. The aggregate HER2 equivocal (score 2+) rate was 14.5%. Of 81 equivocal (score 2+) cases, 70 (86.4%) were nonamplified. CONCLUSIONS.— The data from this study provide multi-institutional benchmark data to assist laboratories performing periodic comparisons as part of a quality management program. Overall expression rates were generally similar to those of other published reports, with the exception of the ER-negative and HER2-positive rates, both of which were somewhat lower.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Welcome to the website of the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (APLM). This monthly, peer-reviewed journal of the College of American Pathologists offers global reach and highest measured readership among pathology journals. Published since 1926, ARCHIVES was voted in 2009 the only pathology journal among the top 100 most influential journals of the past 100 years by the BioMedical and Life Sciences Division of the Special Libraries Association. Online access to the full-text and PDF files of APLM articles is free.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信