言语病理学研究生课程中的识字课程:50 个项目的探索

Julia J. Yi, Karen A. Erickson
{"title":"言语病理学研究生课程中的识字课程:50 个项目的探索","authors":"Julia J. Yi, Karen A. Erickson","doi":"10.1044/2024_persp-23-00239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The purpose of this study was to examine the occurrence of preservice literacy coursework in a sample of graduate speech-language pathology programs in the United States and to investigate the relationship between the likelihood that programs offered literacy coursework and (a) geographical region, (b) Carnegie Classification of research activity, and (c) U.S. News & World Report ranking.\n \n \n \n Course offerings were analyzed from a sample of 50 accredited speech-language pathology graduate programs that were selected through stratified random sampling using the strata of U.S. geographical regions and the Carnegie Classification of research activity.\n \n \n \n \n Only 28% (\n n\n = 14) of the programs in the sample offered a course dedicated to literacy, 42% (\n n\n = 22) offered a course that embedded literacy content, and 14% (\n n\n = 7) offered both a course dedicated to literacy and a course that embedded literacy content. Descriptions of courses dedicated to literacy were at least 60% more likely to specifically reference training in literacy assessment or intervention than the descriptions of courses that embedded literacy content. Region, Carnegie Classification, and U.S. News & World Report ranking did not significantly predict the likelihood of programs offering literacy courses.\n \n \n \n \n This study corroborates surveys of speech-language pathologists regarding their preservice literacy training and reveals the continued need to increase preservice coursework focused on literacy in speech-language pathology graduate programs, ideally through courses that are dedicated to literacy and address both literacy assessment and treatment.\n \n \n \n \n https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25607769\n \n","PeriodicalId":74424,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literacy Coursework in Speech-Language Pathology Graduate Programs: An Exploration of 50 Programs\",\"authors\":\"Julia J. Yi, Karen A. Erickson\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2024_persp-23-00239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n The purpose of this study was to examine the occurrence of preservice literacy coursework in a sample of graduate speech-language pathology programs in the United States and to investigate the relationship between the likelihood that programs offered literacy coursework and (a) geographical region, (b) Carnegie Classification of research activity, and (c) U.S. News & World Report ranking.\\n \\n \\n \\n Course offerings were analyzed from a sample of 50 accredited speech-language pathology graduate programs that were selected through stratified random sampling using the strata of U.S. geographical regions and the Carnegie Classification of research activity.\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n Only 28% (\\n n\\n = 14) of the programs in the sample offered a course dedicated to literacy, 42% (\\n n\\n = 22) offered a course that embedded literacy content, and 14% (\\n n\\n = 7) offered both a course dedicated to literacy and a course that embedded literacy content. Descriptions of courses dedicated to literacy were at least 60% more likely to specifically reference training in literacy assessment or intervention than the descriptions of courses that embedded literacy content. Region, Carnegie Classification, and U.S. News & World Report ranking did not significantly predict the likelihood of programs offering literacy courses.\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n This study corroborates surveys of speech-language pathologists regarding their preservice literacy training and reveals the continued need to increase preservice coursework focused on literacy in speech-language pathology graduate programs, ideally through courses that are dedicated to literacy and address both literacy assessment and treatment.\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25607769\\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":74424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups\",\"volume\":\" 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_persp-23-00239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_persp-23-00239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是抽样调查美国言语病理学研究生课程中职前扫盲课程的开设情况,并研究课程开设扫盲课程的可能性与(a)地理区域、(b)研究活动的卡内基分类以及(c)《美国新闻与世界报道》排名之间的关系。 我们对 50 个经认证的言语语言病理学研究生项目的课程设置进行了分析,这些项目是通过美国地理区域分层随机抽样法和卡内基研究活动分类法选出的。 样本中只有 28% 的项目(n = 14)开设了专门的扫盲课程,42% 的项目(n = 22)开设了包含扫盲内容的课程,14% 的项目(n = 7)同时开设了专门的扫盲课程和包含扫盲内容的课程。与包含扫盲内容的课程相比,专门针对扫盲的课程描述中特别提到扫盲评估或干预培训的可能性至少高出 60%。地区、卡内基分类和《美国新闻与世界报道》排名并不能显著预测开设扫盲课程的可能性。 这项研究证实了对言语病理学家进行的关于他们职前扫盲培训的调查,并揭示了在言语病理研究生课程中增加以扫盲为重点的职前课程的持续必要性,最好是通过专门针对扫盲的课程,并同时涉及扫盲评估和治疗。https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25607769。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Literacy Coursework in Speech-Language Pathology Graduate Programs: An Exploration of 50 Programs
The purpose of this study was to examine the occurrence of preservice literacy coursework in a sample of graduate speech-language pathology programs in the United States and to investigate the relationship between the likelihood that programs offered literacy coursework and (a) geographical region, (b) Carnegie Classification of research activity, and (c) U.S. News & World Report ranking. Course offerings were analyzed from a sample of 50 accredited speech-language pathology graduate programs that were selected through stratified random sampling using the strata of U.S. geographical regions and the Carnegie Classification of research activity. Only 28% ( n = 14) of the programs in the sample offered a course dedicated to literacy, 42% ( n = 22) offered a course that embedded literacy content, and 14% ( n = 7) offered both a course dedicated to literacy and a course that embedded literacy content. Descriptions of courses dedicated to literacy were at least 60% more likely to specifically reference training in literacy assessment or intervention than the descriptions of courses that embedded literacy content. Region, Carnegie Classification, and U.S. News & World Report ranking did not significantly predict the likelihood of programs offering literacy courses. This study corroborates surveys of speech-language pathologists regarding their preservice literacy training and reveals the continued need to increase preservice coursework focused on literacy in speech-language pathology graduate programs, ideally through courses that are dedicated to literacy and address both literacy assessment and treatment. https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25607769
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信