超越指责:通过中和人为因素分类法进行系统事故分析

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Elena Stefana, Emanuele De Paola, Carlo Simone Snaiderbaur Bono, Francesco Bianchini, Tommaso Vagheggi, Riccardo Patriarca
{"title":"超越指责:通过中和人为因素分类法进行系统事故分析","authors":"Elena Stefana,&nbsp;Emanuele De Paola,&nbsp;Carlo Simone Snaiderbaur Bono,&nbsp;Francesco Bianchini,&nbsp;Tommaso Vagheggi,&nbsp;Riccardo Patriarca","doi":"10.1002/hfm.21035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigates the usage of a systemic neutralized taxonomy for understanding human factors to foster a restorative culture when studying adverse events. The available studies supporting accident analysis from a system-theoretic perspective with human factors-based methods are grounded on error taxonomies and do not reinforce the non-judgemental dimension that is encouraged by modern safety science. We propose a methodology to integrate the system-theoretic accident analysis technique, Causal Analysis based on System Theory, with a neutralized taxonomy of human explanatory factors. The proposed methodology has been applied to an aviation accident involving a military aircraft and a glider. This case revealed various critical interactions among system components, which require dedicated safety recommendations that go beyond the identification of single points of failures and root causes, leading to a deeper understanding of socio-technical orchestrations. Despite the use case in aviation, the proposed methodology remains suitable for various types of safety occurrences in diverse domains and industrial settings. It also represents the basis for supporting future proactive safety-related decision-making processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55048,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond blame: A systemic accident analysis through a neutralized human factors taxonomy\",\"authors\":\"Elena Stefana,&nbsp;Emanuele De Paola,&nbsp;Carlo Simone Snaiderbaur Bono,&nbsp;Francesco Bianchini,&nbsp;Tommaso Vagheggi,&nbsp;Riccardo Patriarca\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hfm.21035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper investigates the usage of a systemic neutralized taxonomy for understanding human factors to foster a restorative culture when studying adverse events. The available studies supporting accident analysis from a system-theoretic perspective with human factors-based methods are grounded on error taxonomies and do not reinforce the non-judgemental dimension that is encouraged by modern safety science. We propose a methodology to integrate the system-theoretic accident analysis technique, Causal Analysis based on System Theory, with a neutralized taxonomy of human explanatory factors. The proposed methodology has been applied to an aviation accident involving a military aircraft and a glider. This case revealed various critical interactions among system components, which require dedicated safety recommendations that go beyond the identification of single points of failures and root causes, leading to a deeper understanding of socio-technical orchestrations. Despite the use case in aviation, the proposed methodology remains suitable for various types of safety occurrences in diverse domains and industrial settings. It also represents the basis for supporting future proactive safety-related decision-making processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.21035\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.21035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了如何使用系统中和分类法来理解人为因素,从而在研究不良事件时培养一种恢复性文化。支持从系统理论角度用基于人为因素的方法进行事故分析的现有研究以错误分类法为基础,并没有加强现代安全科学所鼓励的非评判性维度。我们提出了一种将系统理论事故分析技术--基于系统理论的因果分析--与中性化的人为解释因素分类法相结合的方法。我们将所提出的方法应用于一起涉及军用飞机和滑翔机的航空事故。该案例揭示了系统组件之间的各种关键交互作用,这就需要提出专门的安全建议,而不仅仅是识别单点故障和根本原因,从而加深对社会技术协调的理解。尽管使用的是航空案例,但建议的方法仍然适用于不同领域和工业环境中的各类安全事件。它也是支持未来主动安全相关决策过程的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond blame: A systemic accident analysis through a neutralized human factors taxonomy

This paper investigates the usage of a systemic neutralized taxonomy for understanding human factors to foster a restorative culture when studying adverse events. The available studies supporting accident analysis from a system-theoretic perspective with human factors-based methods are grounded on error taxonomies and do not reinforce the non-judgemental dimension that is encouraged by modern safety science. We propose a methodology to integrate the system-theoretic accident analysis technique, Causal Analysis based on System Theory, with a neutralized taxonomy of human explanatory factors. The proposed methodology has been applied to an aviation accident involving a military aircraft and a glider. This case revealed various critical interactions among system components, which require dedicated safety recommendations that go beyond the identification of single points of failures and root causes, leading to a deeper understanding of socio-technical orchestrations. Despite the use case in aviation, the proposed methodology remains suitable for various types of safety occurrences in diverse domains and industrial settings. It also represents the basis for supporting future proactive safety-related decision-making processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries is to facilitate discovery, integration, and application of scientific knowledge about human aspects of manufacturing, and to provide a forum for worldwide dissemination of such knowledge for its application and benefit to manufacturing industries. The journal covers a broad spectrum of ergonomics and human factors issues with a focus on the design, operation and management of contemporary manufacturing systems, both in the shop floor and office environments, in the quest for manufacturing agility, i.e. enhancement and integration of human skills with hardware performance for improved market competitiveness, management of change, product and process quality, and human-system reliability. The inter- and cross-disciplinary nature of the journal allows for a wide scope of issues relevant to manufacturing system design and engineering, human resource management, social, organizational, safety, and health issues. Examples of specific subject areas of interest include: implementation of advanced manufacturing technology, human aspects of computer-aided design and engineering, work design, compensation and appraisal, selection training and education, labor-management relations, agile manufacturing and virtual companies, human factors in total quality management, prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, ergonomics of workplace, equipment and tool design, ergonomics programs, guides and standards for industry, automation safety and robot systems, human skills development and knowledge enhancing technologies, reliability, and safety and worker health issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信