能源与政治之间:种族隔离后南非的毁灭、复兴与国家权力的轮廓

R. Reboredo, P. Carmody
{"title":"能源与政治之间:种族隔离后南非的毁灭、复兴与国家权力的轮廓","authors":"R. Reboredo, P. Carmody","doi":"10.1177/02637758241242213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"South Africa’s energy system is in the midst of significant change and disturbance. On the one hand, a decrease in available generational capacity means that planned blackouts, known as load shedding, have increased to record levels over the last few years; on the other, the country has instituted an ambitious agenda to decarbonize its energy infrastructure. These processes have both caused upheaval across the country’s cities and raised questions regarding the politics of infrastructural provision and development. This article contributes to these debates by exploring the confluence between infrastructure, urban development, and (geo)politics. In particular, we put concepts from critical infrastructure studies (ruin, renewal) into dialogue with Gramscian traditions of political economy in order to analyze what the ongoing breakdown of South Africa’s energy system reveals about shifting power dynamics within the state apparatus. Likewise, we ask whether multi-scalar processes of infrastructural renewal will produce more equitable energy futures. We posit that the energy crisis is creating the pressures and policy space for a considerable reorganization of South Africa’s governance, largely taking the form of decentralization wherein large cities attempt to attain significantly more autonomy vis-à-vis the central state. Nevertheless, as the crisis engenders movements and counter-movements, renewal is likely to be a protracted, and contested, process.","PeriodicalId":504516,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning D: Society and Space","volume":" 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between energy and politics: Ruin, renewal, and the contours of state power in post-apartheid South Africa\",\"authors\":\"R. Reboredo, P. Carmody\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02637758241242213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"South Africa’s energy system is in the midst of significant change and disturbance. On the one hand, a decrease in available generational capacity means that planned blackouts, known as load shedding, have increased to record levels over the last few years; on the other, the country has instituted an ambitious agenda to decarbonize its energy infrastructure. These processes have both caused upheaval across the country’s cities and raised questions regarding the politics of infrastructural provision and development. This article contributes to these debates by exploring the confluence between infrastructure, urban development, and (geo)politics. In particular, we put concepts from critical infrastructure studies (ruin, renewal) into dialogue with Gramscian traditions of political economy in order to analyze what the ongoing breakdown of South Africa’s energy system reveals about shifting power dynamics within the state apparatus. Likewise, we ask whether multi-scalar processes of infrastructural renewal will produce more equitable energy futures. We posit that the energy crisis is creating the pressures and policy space for a considerable reorganization of South Africa’s governance, largely taking the form of decentralization wherein large cities attempt to attain significantly more autonomy vis-à-vis the central state. Nevertheless, as the crisis engenders movements and counter-movements, renewal is likely to be a protracted, and contested, process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment and Planning D: Society and Space\",\"volume\":\" 16\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment and Planning D: Society and Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758241242213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning D: Society and Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758241242213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

南非的能源系统正处于重大变革和动荡之中。一方面,可用发电能力的下降意味着计划停电(即甩负荷)在过去几年中达到了创纪录的水平;另一方面,南非制定了一项雄心勃勃的议程,以实现能源基础设施的去碳化。这些进程既给该国城市带来了动荡,也提出了有关基础设施供应和发展的政治问题。本文通过探讨基础设施、城市发展和(地缘)政治之间的交汇点,为这些争论做出了贡献。特别是,我们将关键基础设施研究(废墟、更新)的概念与葛兰西的政治经济学传统进行对话,以分析南非能源系统的持续崩溃揭示了国家机器内部权力动态的变化。同样,我们也会问,基础设施的多级更新过程是否会产生更加公平的能源未来。我们认为,能源危机正在为南非治理的重大重组创造压力和政策空间,主要采取权力下放的形式,大城市试图获得相对于中央政府的更大自主权。然而,由于危机引发了各种运动和反运动,重建很可能是一个旷日持久、充满争议的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Between energy and politics: Ruin, renewal, and the contours of state power in post-apartheid South Africa
South Africa’s energy system is in the midst of significant change and disturbance. On the one hand, a decrease in available generational capacity means that planned blackouts, known as load shedding, have increased to record levels over the last few years; on the other, the country has instituted an ambitious agenda to decarbonize its energy infrastructure. These processes have both caused upheaval across the country’s cities and raised questions regarding the politics of infrastructural provision and development. This article contributes to these debates by exploring the confluence between infrastructure, urban development, and (geo)politics. In particular, we put concepts from critical infrastructure studies (ruin, renewal) into dialogue with Gramscian traditions of political economy in order to analyze what the ongoing breakdown of South Africa’s energy system reveals about shifting power dynamics within the state apparatus. Likewise, we ask whether multi-scalar processes of infrastructural renewal will produce more equitable energy futures. We posit that the energy crisis is creating the pressures and policy space for a considerable reorganization of South Africa’s governance, largely taking the form of decentralization wherein large cities attempt to attain significantly more autonomy vis-à-vis the central state. Nevertheless, as the crisis engenders movements and counter-movements, renewal is likely to be a protracted, and contested, process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信