美国现有农药农业最佳管理实践的盘点和审查

IF 2.3 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Andy Jacobson*, Nick Guth, Zechariah Stone, Dean Desmarteau and Richard Brain, 
{"title":"美国现有农药农业最佳管理实践的盘点和审查","authors":"Andy Jacobson*,&nbsp;Nick Guth,&nbsp;Zechariah Stone,&nbsp;Dean Desmarteau and Richard Brain,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsagscitech.3c00588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >To reduce pesticide exposure to nontarget organisms in the United States (US), mitigations are being proposed a priori for regulatory compliance. Consequently, agricultural best management practices (BMPs) for pesticide runoff, proposed in the Environmental Protection Agency’s Endangered Species Act (ESA) workplan [<contrib-group>USEPA</contrib-group>. ESA Workplan Update: Nontarget Species Mitigation for Registration\r\nReview and Other FIFRA Actions, <span>2022</span>. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-11/esa-workplan-update.pdf (accessed Feb, 2023)], were inventoried and their feasibility was evaluated. For mitigation “menus” to be successful, they must be comprehensive and include options for a variety of environmental conditions. Based on this inventory, the most adopted practices by landowners were soil cover and erosion control practices due to their widespread applicability to most cropland. In contrast, the least adopted practices were water management and vegetative buffer practices due to increased costs and land requirements. This work can support the refinement of the pesticide risk assessment process, including future mitigation options, and assist landowners in selecting the most feasible BMPs for their individual operation in compliance with the ESA.</p>","PeriodicalId":93846,"journal":{"name":"ACS agricultural science & technology","volume":"4 5","pages":"567–579"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsagscitech.3c00588","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inventory and Review of Existing Agricultural Best Management Practices for Pesticides in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Andy Jacobson*,&nbsp;Nick Guth,&nbsp;Zechariah Stone,&nbsp;Dean Desmarteau and Richard Brain,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsagscitech.3c00588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >To reduce pesticide exposure to nontarget organisms in the United States (US), mitigations are being proposed a priori for regulatory compliance. Consequently, agricultural best management practices (BMPs) for pesticide runoff, proposed in the Environmental Protection Agency’s Endangered Species Act (ESA) workplan [<contrib-group>USEPA</contrib-group>. ESA Workplan Update: Nontarget Species Mitigation for Registration\\r\\nReview and Other FIFRA Actions, <span>2022</span>. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-11/esa-workplan-update.pdf (accessed Feb, 2023)], were inventoried and their feasibility was evaluated. For mitigation “menus” to be successful, they must be comprehensive and include options for a variety of environmental conditions. Based on this inventory, the most adopted practices by landowners were soil cover and erosion control practices due to their widespread applicability to most cropland. In contrast, the least adopted practices were water management and vegetative buffer practices due to increased costs and land requirements. This work can support the refinement of the pesticide risk assessment process, including future mitigation options, and assist landowners in selecting the most feasible BMPs for their individual operation in compliance with the ESA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS agricultural science & technology\",\"volume\":\"4 5\",\"pages\":\"567–579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsagscitech.3c00588\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS agricultural science & technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsagscitech.3c00588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS agricultural science & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsagscitech.3c00588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,为了减少非目标生物接触农药的机会,正在事先提出缓解措施,以符合法规要求。因此,环境保护局的《濒危物种法》(ESA)工作计划[USEPA.https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-11/esa-workplan-update.pdf (accessed Feb, 2023)],对其可行性进行了评估。缓解 "菜单 "要想取得成功,就必须全面,并包括各种环境条件下的备选方案。根据这份清单,土地所有者采用最多的措施是土壤覆盖和侵蚀控制措施,因为它们广泛适用于大多数耕地。相比之下,采用最少的是水管理和植被缓冲措施,原因是成本和土地需求增加。这项工作可以支持农药风险评估过程的完善,包括未来的缓解方案,并帮助土地所有者选择最可行的 BMP,以符合 ESA 的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Inventory and Review of Existing Agricultural Best Management Practices for Pesticides in the United States

Inventory and Review of Existing Agricultural Best Management Practices for Pesticides in the United States

To reduce pesticide exposure to nontarget organisms in the United States (US), mitigations are being proposed a priori for regulatory compliance. Consequently, agricultural best management practices (BMPs) for pesticide runoff, proposed in the Environmental Protection Agency’s Endangered Species Act (ESA) workplan [USEPA. ESA Workplan Update: Nontarget Species Mitigation for Registration Review and Other FIFRA Actions, 2022. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-11/esa-workplan-update.pdf (accessed Feb, 2023)], were inventoried and their feasibility was evaluated. For mitigation “menus” to be successful, they must be comprehensive and include options for a variety of environmental conditions. Based on this inventory, the most adopted practices by landowners were soil cover and erosion control practices due to their widespread applicability to most cropland. In contrast, the least adopted practices were water management and vegetative buffer practices due to increased costs and land requirements. This work can support the refinement of the pesticide risk assessment process, including future mitigation options, and assist landowners in selecting the most feasible BMPs for their individual operation in compliance with the ESA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信