疗效与挑战:治疗多发性硬化症三叉神经痛的微创手术--系统回顾与元分析》(Minimally Invasive Procedures for Trigeminal Neuralgia Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis)。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROIMAGING
Masoud SohrabiAsl, Mohammad Shirani, Amin Jahanbakhshi, Arad Iranmehr
{"title":"疗效与挑战:治疗多发性硬化症三叉神经痛的微创手术--系统回顾与元分析》(Minimally Invasive Procedures for Trigeminal Neuralgia Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis)。","authors":"Masoud SohrabiAsl, Mohammad Shirani, Amin Jahanbakhshi, Arad Iranmehr","doi":"10.1159/000538516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nTrigeminal neuralgia (TGN) poses a therapeutic challenge, particularly within the context of multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of four less-invasive treatment modalities for TGN in MS patients, namely, gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS), glycerol rhizotomy (GR), balloon compression (BC), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).\n\n\nMETHODS\nSingle-armed meta-analyses were employed to assess the overall efficacy of each treatment, while double-armed analyses compared the efficacy between different treatment options in double-armed studies. Outcome evaluations included acute pain relief (within 1 month post-procedure), recurrence rates throughout 18 months of follow-up, and reported complication rates.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe meta-analysis revealed diverse outcomes for each intervention. GKRS demonstrated favorable outcomes, achieving a 77% success rate in alleviating pain among a pooled cohort of 863 patients, reinforcing its status as a viable therapeutic option. Additionally, GR, BC, and RFA exhibited efficacy, with success rates of 77%, 71%, and 80%, respectively, based on outcomes observed in 611, 385, and 203 patients. Double-armed analyses highlighted distinctions between the treatments, providing nuanced insights for clinical decision-making.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis meta-analysis provides a comprehensive overview of less-invasive treatments for TGN in MS patients. GKRS emerges as a leading option with comparable efficacy and fewer complications. However, the study underscores the nuanced efficacy and considerations associated with GR, BC, and RFA. The findings offer valuable insights for clinicians navigating treatment choices in this challenging patient population, considering acute pain relief, recurrence rates, and complication profiles.","PeriodicalId":22078,"journal":{"name":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Challenges: Minimally Invasive Procedures for Trigeminal Neuralgia Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Masoud SohrabiAsl, Mohammad Shirani, Amin Jahanbakhshi, Arad Iranmehr\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000538516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nTrigeminal neuralgia (TGN) poses a therapeutic challenge, particularly within the context of multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of four less-invasive treatment modalities for TGN in MS patients, namely, gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS), glycerol rhizotomy (GR), balloon compression (BC), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nSingle-armed meta-analyses were employed to assess the overall efficacy of each treatment, while double-armed analyses compared the efficacy between different treatment options in double-armed studies. Outcome evaluations included acute pain relief (within 1 month post-procedure), recurrence rates throughout 18 months of follow-up, and reported complication rates.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe meta-analysis revealed diverse outcomes for each intervention. GKRS demonstrated favorable outcomes, achieving a 77% success rate in alleviating pain among a pooled cohort of 863 patients, reinforcing its status as a viable therapeutic option. Additionally, GR, BC, and RFA exhibited efficacy, with success rates of 77%, 71%, and 80%, respectively, based on outcomes observed in 611, 385, and 203 patients. Double-armed analyses highlighted distinctions between the treatments, providing nuanced insights for clinical decision-making.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThis meta-analysis provides a comprehensive overview of less-invasive treatments for TGN in MS patients. GKRS emerges as a leading option with comparable efficacy and fewer complications. However, the study underscores the nuanced efficacy and considerations associated with GR, BC, and RFA. The findings offer valuable insights for clinicians navigating treatment choices in this challenging patient population, considering acute pain relief, recurrence rates, and complication profiles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538516\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言三叉神经痛(TGN)是一种治疗难题,尤其是在多发性硬化症(MS)的情况下。本研究旨在对四种治疗 MS 患者 TGN 的微创疗法,即伽玛刀放射外科手术(GKRS)、甘油根切术(GR)、球囊压迫术(BC)和射频消融术(RFA),进行全面的荟萃分析和系统综述。结果评估包括急性疼痛缓解(术后 1 个月内)、18 个月随访期间的复发率以及报告的并发症发生率。GKRS 显示出良好的结果,在汇集的 863 例患者中,缓解疼痛的成功率达到 77%,巩固了其作为可行治疗方案的地位。此外,根据对 611、385 和 203 名患者的观察结果,GR、BC 和 RFA 也显示出疗效,成功率分别为 77%、71% 和 80%。双臂分析强调了不同治疗方法之间的区别,为临床决策提供了细致入微的见解。GKRS是一种疗效相当、并发症较少的主要选择。然而,该研究强调了与 GR、BC 和 RFA 相关的细微疗效和注意事项。考虑到急性疼痛缓解、复发率和并发症情况,研究结果为临床医生在这一具有挑战性的患者群体中选择治疗方法提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Challenges: Minimally Invasive Procedures for Trigeminal Neuralgia Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
INTRODUCTION Trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) poses a therapeutic challenge, particularly within the context of multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of four less-invasive treatment modalities for TGN in MS patients, namely, gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS), glycerol rhizotomy (GR), balloon compression (BC), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS Single-armed meta-analyses were employed to assess the overall efficacy of each treatment, while double-armed analyses compared the efficacy between different treatment options in double-armed studies. Outcome evaluations included acute pain relief (within 1 month post-procedure), recurrence rates throughout 18 months of follow-up, and reported complication rates. RESULTS The meta-analysis revealed diverse outcomes for each intervention. GKRS demonstrated favorable outcomes, achieving a 77% success rate in alleviating pain among a pooled cohort of 863 patients, reinforcing its status as a viable therapeutic option. Additionally, GR, BC, and RFA exhibited efficacy, with success rates of 77%, 71%, and 80%, respectively, based on outcomes observed in 611, 385, and 203 patients. Double-armed analyses highlighted distinctions between the treatments, providing nuanced insights for clinical decision-making. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive overview of less-invasive treatments for TGN in MS patients. GKRS emerges as a leading option with comparable efficacy and fewer complications. However, the study underscores the nuanced efficacy and considerations associated with GR, BC, and RFA. The findings offer valuable insights for clinicians navigating treatment choices in this challenging patient population, considering acute pain relief, recurrence rates, and complication profiles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' provides a single source for the reader to keep abreast of developments in the most rapidly advancing subspecialty within neurosurgery. Technological advances in computer-assisted surgery, robotics, imaging and neurophysiology are being applied to clinical problems with ever-increasing rapidity in stereotaxis more than any other field, providing opportunities for new approaches to surgical and radiotherapeutic management of diseases of the brain, spinal cord, and spine. Issues feature advances in the use of deep-brain stimulation, imaging-guided techniques in stereotactic biopsy and craniotomy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and stereotactically implanted and guided radiotherapeutics and biologicals in the treatment of functional and movement disorders, brain tumors, and other diseases of the brain. Background information from basic science laboratories related to such clinical advances provides the reader with an overall perspective of this field. Proceedings and abstracts from many of the key international meetings furnish an overview of this specialty available nowhere else. ''Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery'' meets the information needs of both investigators and clinicians in this rapidly advancing field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信