Marcelo A. S. Carneiro, Paulo Ricardo P. Nunes, Markus V. C. Souza, Cláudio O. Assumpção, Fábio L. Orsatti
{"title":"在训练有素的男性中,全身阻力训练比分身常规训练更能促进脂肪量的减少:随机试验","authors":"Marcelo A. S. Carneiro, Paulo Ricardo P. Nunes, Markus V. C. Souza, Cláudio O. Assumpção, Fábio L. Orsatti","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While significant progress has been made in understanding the resistance training (RT) strategy for muscle hypertrophy increase, there remains limited knowledge about its impact on fat mass loss. This study aimed to investigate whether full-body is superior to split-body routine in promoting fat mass loss among well-trained males. Twenty-three participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: full-body (<i>n</i> = 11, training muscle groups 5 days per week) and split-body (<i>n</i> = 12, training muscle groups 1 day per week). Both groups performed a weekly set volume-matched condition (75 sets/week, 8–12 repetition maximum at 70%–80 % of 1RM) for 8 weeks, 5 days per week with differences only in the routine. Whole-body and regional fat were assessed using DXA at the beginning and at the end of the study. Full-body RT elicited greater losses compared to split-body in whole-body fat mass (−0.775 ± 1.120 kg vs. +0.317 ± 1.260 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.040), upper-limb fat mass (−0.085 ± 0.118 kg vs. +0.066 ± 0.162 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.019), gynoid fat mass (−0.142 ± 0.230 kg vs. +0.123 ± 0.230 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.012), lower-limb fat mass (−0.197 ± 0.204 kg vs. +0.055 ± 0.328 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.040), and a trend in interaction in android fat mass (−0.116 ± 0.153 kg vs. +0.026 ± 0.174 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.051), with large effects sizes (η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> ≥ 0.17). This study provides evidence that full-body is more effective in reducing whole-body and regional fat mass compared to split-body routine in well-trained males.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12104","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Full-body resistance training promotes greater fat mass loss than a split-body routine in well-trained males: A randomized trial\",\"authors\":\"Marcelo A. S. Carneiro, Paulo Ricardo P. Nunes, Markus V. C. Souza, Cláudio O. Assumpção, Fábio L. Orsatti\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejsc.12104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>While significant progress has been made in understanding the resistance training (RT) strategy for muscle hypertrophy increase, there remains limited knowledge about its impact on fat mass loss. This study aimed to investigate whether full-body is superior to split-body routine in promoting fat mass loss among well-trained males. Twenty-three participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: full-body (<i>n</i> = 11, training muscle groups 5 days per week) and split-body (<i>n</i> = 12, training muscle groups 1 day per week). Both groups performed a weekly set volume-matched condition (75 sets/week, 8–12 repetition maximum at 70%–80 % of 1RM) for 8 weeks, 5 days per week with differences only in the routine. Whole-body and regional fat were assessed using DXA at the beginning and at the end of the study. Full-body RT elicited greater losses compared to split-body in whole-body fat mass (−0.775 ± 1.120 kg vs. +0.317 ± 1.260 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.040), upper-limb fat mass (−0.085 ± 0.118 kg vs. +0.066 ± 0.162 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.019), gynoid fat mass (−0.142 ± 0.230 kg vs. +0.123 ± 0.230 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.012), lower-limb fat mass (−0.197 ± 0.204 kg vs. +0.055 ± 0.328 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.040), and a trend in interaction in android fat mass (−0.116 ± 0.153 kg vs. +0.026 ± 0.174 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.051), with large effects sizes (η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> ≥ 0.17). This study provides evidence that full-body is more effective in reducing whole-body and regional fat mass compared to split-body routine in well-trained males.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12104\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
虽然人们在理解阻力训练(RT)增加肌肉肥大的策略方面取得了重大进展,但对其对减少脂肪量的影响的了解仍然有限。本研究旨在调查在促进训练有素的男性减少脂肪量方面,全身训练是否优于分身训练。23 名参与者被随机分配到两组中的一组:全身组(n = 11,每周训练肌肉群 5 天)和分身组(n = 12,每周训练肌肉群 1 天)。两组均进行为期 8 周、每周 5 天的每周组量匹配训练(75 组/周,最大重复次数为 8-12 次,达到 1RM 的 70%-80% ),两组的不同之处仅在于训练程序。在研究开始和结束时,使用 DXA 对全身和区域脂肪进行评估。在全身脂肪量(-0.775 ± 1.120 kg vs. +0.317 ± 1.260 kg; p = 0.040)、上肢脂肪量(-0.085 ± 0.118 kg vs. +0.066 ± 0.162 kg; p = 0.019)、雌蕊脂肪量(-0.142 ± 0.230 kg vs. +0.123 ± 0.230 kg; p = 0.012)、下肢脂肪量(-0.197 ± 0.204 kg vs. +0.055 ± 0.328 kg; p = 0.040),以及甲状腺脂肪量的交互作用趋势(-0.116 ± 0.153 kg vs. +0.026 ± 0.174 kg; p = 0.051),效应大小较大(η2p ≥ 0.17)。这项研究提供的证据表明,在训练有素的男性中,与分体式相比,全身式能更有效地减少全身和区域脂肪量。
Full-body resistance training promotes greater fat mass loss than a split-body routine in well-trained males: A randomized trial
While significant progress has been made in understanding the resistance training (RT) strategy for muscle hypertrophy increase, there remains limited knowledge about its impact on fat mass loss. This study aimed to investigate whether full-body is superior to split-body routine in promoting fat mass loss among well-trained males. Twenty-three participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: full-body (n = 11, training muscle groups 5 days per week) and split-body (n = 12, training muscle groups 1 day per week). Both groups performed a weekly set volume-matched condition (75 sets/week, 8–12 repetition maximum at 70%–80 % of 1RM) for 8 weeks, 5 days per week with differences only in the routine. Whole-body and regional fat were assessed using DXA at the beginning and at the end of the study. Full-body RT elicited greater losses compared to split-body in whole-body fat mass (−0.775 ± 1.120 kg vs. +0.317 ± 1.260 kg; p = 0.040), upper-limb fat mass (−0.085 ± 0.118 kg vs. +0.066 ± 0.162 kg; p = 0.019), gynoid fat mass (−0.142 ± 0.230 kg vs. +0.123 ± 0.230 kg; p = 0.012), lower-limb fat mass (−0.197 ± 0.204 kg vs. +0.055 ± 0.328 kg; p = 0.040), and a trend in interaction in android fat mass (−0.116 ± 0.153 kg vs. +0.026 ± 0.174 kg; p = 0.051), with large effects sizes (η2p ≥ 0.17). This study provides evidence that full-body is more effective in reducing whole-body and regional fat mass compared to split-body routine in well-trained males.