超越单一诊断:通过基因组测序探索儿科患者的多诊断现实

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Fen Guo, Ruby Liu, Yinghong Pan, Mary Colasanto, Christin Collins, Madhuri Hegde
{"title":"超越单一诊断:通过基因组测序探索儿科患者的多诊断现实","authors":"Fen Guo,&nbsp;Ruby Liu,&nbsp;Yinghong Pan,&nbsp;Mary Colasanto,&nbsp;Christin Collins,&nbsp;Madhuri Hegde","doi":"10.1155/2024/9115364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent advancements in the next-generation sequencing have illuminated the occurrence of multiple genetic diagnoses (MGD). While exome sequencing has provided insights, genome sequencing (GS), the most comprehensive diagnostic tool, remains underexplored for studying MGD prevalence. We retrospectively analyzed 1487 pediatric cases from our laboratory, employing GS to investigate the incidence of single definitive genetic diagnosis (SDD) and MGD in children suspected of having a genetic disease. Of these patients, 273 received at least one definitive diagnosis, including 245 with SDD (16.5%) and 28 with MGD (1.9%). Diagnostic yield was consistent across genders and unaffected by previous testing in SDD cases. Notably, prior testing significantly increased the diagnostic yield in MGD cases to 2.7% overall and 14.4% among diagnosed cases, compared to 1.1% for those with GS as a first-tier test. Age was a significant factor in diagnostic outcome for both SDD and MGD cases with neonates showing the highest diagnostic yield of 24.5% in SDD and a notably higher yield in MGD at 4.9%, representing 16.7% of the diagnosed cases. Of the 28 MGD cases, 17 exhibited distinct phenotypes, 9 had overlapping features, and 2 presented a mix, underscoring the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity within this group. This study is the first to exclusively use GS to assess MGD prevalence. Our findings highlight the complexity of rare diseases and emphasize the importance of comprehensive, genome-level diagnostics. Clinicians must ensure that diagnoses fully account for the observed phenotypes to inform optimal therapeutic strategies and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Single Diagnosis: Exploring Multidiagnostic Realities in Pediatric Patients through Genome Sequencing\",\"authors\":\"Fen Guo,&nbsp;Ruby Liu,&nbsp;Yinghong Pan,&nbsp;Mary Colasanto,&nbsp;Christin Collins,&nbsp;Madhuri Hegde\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/9115364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recent advancements in the next-generation sequencing have illuminated the occurrence of multiple genetic diagnoses (MGD). While exome sequencing has provided insights, genome sequencing (GS), the most comprehensive diagnostic tool, remains underexplored for studying MGD prevalence. We retrospectively analyzed 1487 pediatric cases from our laboratory, employing GS to investigate the incidence of single definitive genetic diagnosis (SDD) and MGD in children suspected of having a genetic disease. Of these patients, 273 received at least one definitive diagnosis, including 245 with SDD (16.5%) and 28 with MGD (1.9%). Diagnostic yield was consistent across genders and unaffected by previous testing in SDD cases. Notably, prior testing significantly increased the diagnostic yield in MGD cases to 2.7% overall and 14.4% among diagnosed cases, compared to 1.1% for those with GS as a first-tier test. Age was a significant factor in diagnostic outcome for both SDD and MGD cases with neonates showing the highest diagnostic yield of 24.5% in SDD and a notably higher yield in MGD at 4.9%, representing 16.7% of the diagnosed cases. Of the 28 MGD cases, 17 exhibited distinct phenotypes, 9 had overlapping features, and 2 presented a mix, underscoring the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity within this group. This study is the first to exclusively use GS to assess MGD prevalence. Our findings highlight the complexity of rare diseases and emphasize the importance of comprehensive, genome-level diagnostics. Clinicians must ensure that diagnoses fully account for the observed phenotypes to inform optimal therapeutic strategies and management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/9115364\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/9115364","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下一代测序技术的最新进展揭示了多基因遗传病(MGD)的发生。虽然外显子组测序提供了深入的见解,但基因组测序(GS)作为最全面的诊断工具,在研究多基因遗传病发病率方面仍未得到充分开发。我们回顾性分析了本实验室的 1487 例儿科病例,利用基因组测序调查了单基因确诊(SDD)和疑似遗传病患儿的 MGD 发生率。在这些患者中,有 273 人获得了至少一次明确诊断,其中包括 245 名 SDD 患者(16.5%)和 28 名 MGD 患者(1.9%)。在 SDD 病例中,不同性别的诊断率是一致的,并且不受先前检测的影响。值得注意的是,既往检测大大提高了MGD病例的诊断率,总诊断率为2.7%,确诊病例的诊断率为14.4%,而GS作为一级检测的诊断率仅为1.1%。年龄是影响 SDD 和 MGD 诊断结果的一个重要因素,其中新生儿的 SDD 诊断率最高,为 24.5%,而 MGD 的诊断率明显更高,为 4.9%,占确诊病例的 16.7%。在28例MGD病例中,17例表现出不同的表型,9例有重叠的特征,2例表现出混合的特征,突显了这一群体中遗传和表型的异质性。本研究是第一项专门使用 GS 评估 MGD 患病率的研究。我们的研究结果突显了罕见病的复杂性,并强调了全面的基因组水平诊断的重要性。临床医生必须确保诊断充分考虑到所观察到的表型,以便为最佳治疗策略和管理提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond Single Diagnosis: Exploring Multidiagnostic Realities in Pediatric Patients through Genome Sequencing

Recent advancements in the next-generation sequencing have illuminated the occurrence of multiple genetic diagnoses (MGD). While exome sequencing has provided insights, genome sequencing (GS), the most comprehensive diagnostic tool, remains underexplored for studying MGD prevalence. We retrospectively analyzed 1487 pediatric cases from our laboratory, employing GS to investigate the incidence of single definitive genetic diagnosis (SDD) and MGD in children suspected of having a genetic disease. Of these patients, 273 received at least one definitive diagnosis, including 245 with SDD (16.5%) and 28 with MGD (1.9%). Diagnostic yield was consistent across genders and unaffected by previous testing in SDD cases. Notably, prior testing significantly increased the diagnostic yield in MGD cases to 2.7% overall and 14.4% among diagnosed cases, compared to 1.1% for those with GS as a first-tier test. Age was a significant factor in diagnostic outcome for both SDD and MGD cases with neonates showing the highest diagnostic yield of 24.5% in SDD and a notably higher yield in MGD at 4.9%, representing 16.7% of the diagnosed cases. Of the 28 MGD cases, 17 exhibited distinct phenotypes, 9 had overlapping features, and 2 presented a mix, underscoring the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity within this group. This study is the first to exclusively use GS to assess MGD prevalence. Our findings highlight the complexity of rare diseases and emphasize the importance of comprehensive, genome-level diagnostics. Clinicians must ensure that diagnoses fully account for the observed phenotypes to inform optimal therapeutic strategies and management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信