通过傅立叶变换红外光谱法、MALDI 质谱法和全基因组测序对细菌进行鉴别。

IF 2.5 4区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Rachel McGalliard, H. Muhamadali, N. AlMasoud, S. Haldenby, Valeria Romero-Soriano, Ellie Allman, Yun Xu, Adam P Roberts, Steve Paterson, E. Carrol, R. Goodacre
{"title":"通过傅立叶变换红外光谱法、MALDI 质谱法和全基因组测序对细菌进行鉴别。","authors":"Rachel McGalliard, H. Muhamadali, N. AlMasoud, S. Haldenby, Valeria Romero-Soriano, Ellie Allman, Yun Xu, Adam P Roberts, Steve Paterson, E. Carrol, R. Goodacre","doi":"10.2217/fmb-2024-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Proof-of-concept study, highlighting the clinical diagnostic ability of FT-IR compared with MALDI-TOF MS, combined with WGS. Materials & methods: 104 pathogenic isolates of Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus were analyzed. Results: Overall prediction accuracy was 99.6% in FT-IR and 95.8% in MALDI-TOF-MS. Analysis of N. meningitidis serogroups was superior in FT-IR compared with MALDI-TOF-MS. Phylogenetic relationship of S. pyogenes was similar by FT-IR and WGS, but not S. aureus or S. pneumoniae. Clinical severity was associated with the zinc ABC transporter and DNA repair genes in S. pneumoniae and cell wall proteins (biofilm formation, antibiotic and complement permeability) in S. aureus via WGS. Conclusion: FT-IR warrants further clinical evaluation as a promising diagnostic tool.","PeriodicalId":12773,"journal":{"name":"Future microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacterial discrimination by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, MALDI-mass spectrometry and whole-genome sequencing.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel McGalliard, H. Muhamadali, N. AlMasoud, S. Haldenby, Valeria Romero-Soriano, Ellie Allman, Yun Xu, Adam P Roberts, Steve Paterson, E. Carrol, R. Goodacre\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/fmb-2024-0043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Proof-of-concept study, highlighting the clinical diagnostic ability of FT-IR compared with MALDI-TOF MS, combined with WGS. Materials & methods: 104 pathogenic isolates of Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus were analyzed. Results: Overall prediction accuracy was 99.6% in FT-IR and 95.8% in MALDI-TOF-MS. Analysis of N. meningitidis serogroups was superior in FT-IR compared with MALDI-TOF-MS. Phylogenetic relationship of S. pyogenes was similar by FT-IR and WGS, but not S. aureus or S. pneumoniae. Clinical severity was associated with the zinc ABC transporter and DNA repair genes in S. pneumoniae and cell wall proteins (biofilm formation, antibiotic and complement permeability) in S. aureus via WGS. Conclusion: FT-IR warrants further clinical evaluation as a promising diagnostic tool.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2024-0043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2024-0043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:概念验证研究,强调傅立叶变换红外光谱与 MALDI-TOF MS 相比,结合 WGS 的临床诊断能力。材料与方法:分析了 104 株脑膜炎奈瑟菌、肺炎链球菌、化脓性链球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的致病性分离物。结果显示傅立叶变换红外光谱的总体预测准确率为 99.6%,MALDI-TOF-MS 为 95.8%。与 MALDI-TOF-MS 相比,傅立叶变换红外光谱对脑膜炎双球菌血清群的分析更为准确。通过傅立叶变换红外光谱和 WGS 分析,化脓性链球菌的系统发育关系相似,但金黄色葡萄球菌和肺炎双球菌的系统发育关系不相似。肺炎双球菌的临床严重程度与锌ABC转运体和DNA修复基因有关,而金黄色葡萄球菌的细胞壁蛋白(生物膜形成、抗生素和补体渗透性)则与WGS有关。结论傅立叶变换红外光谱作为一种有前途的诊断工具,值得临床进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bacterial discrimination by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, MALDI-mass spectrometry and whole-genome sequencing.
Aim: Proof-of-concept study, highlighting the clinical diagnostic ability of FT-IR compared with MALDI-TOF MS, combined with WGS. Materials & methods: 104 pathogenic isolates of Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus were analyzed. Results: Overall prediction accuracy was 99.6% in FT-IR and 95.8% in MALDI-TOF-MS. Analysis of N. meningitidis serogroups was superior in FT-IR compared with MALDI-TOF-MS. Phylogenetic relationship of S. pyogenes was similar by FT-IR and WGS, but not S. aureus or S. pneumoniae. Clinical severity was associated with the zinc ABC transporter and DNA repair genes in S. pneumoniae and cell wall proteins (biofilm formation, antibiotic and complement permeability) in S. aureus via WGS. Conclusion: FT-IR warrants further clinical evaluation as a promising diagnostic tool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future microbiology
Future microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Microbiology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for this increasingly important and vast area of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信