野生鸟类与抗菌药耐药性生态学:一种监测方法

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Tullia Guardia, Lorena Varriale, Adriano Minichino, Rosario Balestrieri, Danila Mastronardi, Tamara Pasqualina Russo, Ludovico Dipineto, Alessandro Fioretti, Luca Borrelli
{"title":"野生鸟类与抗菌药耐药性生态学:一种监测方法","authors":"Tullia Guardia,&nbsp;Lorena Varriale,&nbsp;Adriano Minichino,&nbsp;Rosario Balestrieri,&nbsp;Danila Mastronardi,&nbsp;Tamara Pasqualina Russo,&nbsp;Ludovico Dipineto,&nbsp;Alessandro Fioretti,&nbsp;Luca Borrelli","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tackling the global threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) requires joint efforts according to the principles of the One Health approach. In this context, wildlife, and especially wild birds, are recognized as an important bridge between environment, humans and livestock in perpetuating AMR. Over the last decades, important progress has been made in understanding the role of wild birds as carriers of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and their genes (ARGs) within ecosystems; however, there are still many knowledge gaps regarding transmission sources and routes. This commentary summarizes studies from recent years focusing on AMR in wild birds, highlighting the most frequently found zoonotic bacteria harboring ARGs and the possible exchange scenarios between humans, livestock, and wild birds. We emphasize the need to standardize and optimize a wild bird monitoring approach for AMR surveillance that includes non-invasive sampling methods, culture-independent techniques for identification of ARGs, database integration and implementation, and machine learning technology. This multidisciplinary perspective, which could involve veterinarians, biologists, ornithologists, conservationists, and managers, may represent part of the solution, not only for wildlife conservation but also for global health, considering that the goal is to reverse the route of AMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"88 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wild birds and the ecology of antimicrobial resistance: an approach to monitoring\",\"authors\":\"Tullia Guardia,&nbsp;Lorena Varriale,&nbsp;Adriano Minichino,&nbsp;Rosario Balestrieri,&nbsp;Danila Mastronardi,&nbsp;Tamara Pasqualina Russo,&nbsp;Ludovico Dipineto,&nbsp;Alessandro Fioretti,&nbsp;Luca Borrelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jwmg.22588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Tackling the global threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) requires joint efforts according to the principles of the One Health approach. In this context, wildlife, and especially wild birds, are recognized as an important bridge between environment, humans and livestock in perpetuating AMR. Over the last decades, important progress has been made in understanding the role of wild birds as carriers of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and their genes (ARGs) within ecosystems; however, there are still many knowledge gaps regarding transmission sources and routes. This commentary summarizes studies from recent years focusing on AMR in wild birds, highlighting the most frequently found zoonotic bacteria harboring ARGs and the possible exchange scenarios between humans, livestock, and wild birds. We emphasize the need to standardize and optimize a wild bird monitoring approach for AMR surveillance that includes non-invasive sampling methods, culture-independent techniques for identification of ARGs, database integration and implementation, and machine learning technology. This multidisciplinary perspective, which could involve veterinarians, biologists, ornithologists, conservationists, and managers, may represent part of the solution, not only for wildlife conservation but also for global health, considering that the goal is to reverse the route of AMR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"volume\":\"88 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22588\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22588","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

应对全球抗菌药耐药性(AMR)的威胁需要根据 "一个健康 "方法的原则共同努力。在这一背景下,野生动物,尤其是野生鸟类,被认为是环境、人类和牲畜之间的重要桥梁,使抗生素耐药性长期存在。过去几十年来,在了解野生鸟类作为生态系统中耐药细菌及其基因(ARGs)携带者的作用方面取得了重要进展;然而,在传播源和传播途径方面仍存在许多知识空白。这篇评论总结了近年来有关野生鸟类中 AMR 的研究,强调了最常发现的携带 ARGs 的人畜共患细菌以及人类、家畜和野生鸟类之间可能的交流情况。我们强调有必要规范和优化用于 AMR 监测的野鸟监测方法,其中包括非侵入性采样方法、识别 ARGs 的独立于培养的技术、数据库集成和实施以及机器学习技术。兽医、生物学家、鸟类学家、自然保护主义者和管理者都可以从这一多学科角度参与其中,考虑到我们的目标是扭转 AMR 的发展方向,因此这种方法可能不仅是野生动物保护解决方案的一部分,也是全球健康解决方案的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Wild birds and the ecology of antimicrobial resistance: an approach to monitoring

Wild birds and the ecology of antimicrobial resistance: an approach to monitoring

Tackling the global threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) requires joint efforts according to the principles of the One Health approach. In this context, wildlife, and especially wild birds, are recognized as an important bridge between environment, humans and livestock in perpetuating AMR. Over the last decades, important progress has been made in understanding the role of wild birds as carriers of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and their genes (ARGs) within ecosystems; however, there are still many knowledge gaps regarding transmission sources and routes. This commentary summarizes studies from recent years focusing on AMR in wild birds, highlighting the most frequently found zoonotic bacteria harboring ARGs and the possible exchange scenarios between humans, livestock, and wild birds. We emphasize the need to standardize and optimize a wild bird monitoring approach for AMR surveillance that includes non-invasive sampling methods, culture-independent techniques for identification of ARGs, database integration and implementation, and machine learning technology. This multidisciplinary perspective, which could involve veterinarians, biologists, ornithologists, conservationists, and managers, may represent part of the solution, not only for wildlife conservation but also for global health, considering that the goal is to reverse the route of AMR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信