{"title":"太阳能技术可行性比较：工业界的替代建议","authors":"Mert Gürtürk, Murat Erdem, Ferhat Uçar","doi":"10.1007/s12053-024-10226-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, 11 provinces with more than 1 MW solar power plants (SPP) in Turkey have been examined in terms of global solar radiation and power produced. The main objective of this study is to underline the serious differences in technical feasibility analysis conducted by the academic circles and solar energy industrial environments in Turkey. The obtained results were compared with the values operated by the private installation companies in the industry, these were interpreted, and the disagreements were revealed. Moreover, the study reveals some gaps in technical feasibility analysis, which the sector professionals usually ignore in the field. The findings were evaluated in monthly, annual, and seasonal time zones. The present study showed that the analysis, to which private companies in the field refer, is insufficient and the parameters that would guide the investor in detail could not be obtained. More detailed prospection has been obtained within the scope of this study.</p><p>Considering the whole of our findings, while the most advantageous location for investing in SPPs in Antalya with a total of 97.50 h monthly average sunshine duration and radiation of 59,599.6 W/m<sup>2</sup> throughout the year, the most disadvantaged location is Kahramanmaraş with a total monthly average sunshine duration of 80.80 h and a radiation value of 44,810.8 W/m<sup>2</sup>-year. Antalya is followed by Mardin location (monthly average sunshine duration of 96.10 h and radiation of 59,487.9 W/m<sup>2</sup>-year) and Karaman (monthly average sunshine duration of 94.40 h and radiation of 58,847.1 W/m<sup>2</sup>-year).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solar energy technical feasibility comparison: an alternative proposal for the Industry\",\"authors\":\"Mert Gürtürk, Murat Erdem, Ferhat Uçar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12053-024-10226-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, 11 provinces with more than 1 MW solar power plants (SPP) in Turkey have been examined in terms of global solar radiation and power produced. The main objective of this study is to underline the serious differences in technical feasibility analysis conducted by the academic circles and solar energy industrial environments in Turkey. The obtained results were compared with the values operated by the private installation companies in the industry, these were interpreted, and the disagreements were revealed. Moreover, the study reveals some gaps in technical feasibility analysis, which the sector professionals usually ignore in the field. The findings were evaluated in monthly, annual, and seasonal time zones. The present study showed that the analysis, to which private companies in the field refer, is insufficient and the parameters that would guide the investor in detail could not be obtained. More detailed prospection has been obtained within the scope of this study.</p><p>Considering the whole of our findings, while the most advantageous location for investing in SPPs in Antalya with a total of 97.50 h monthly average sunshine duration and radiation of 59,599.6 W/m<sup>2</sup> throughout the year, the most disadvantaged location is Kahramanmaraş with a total monthly average sunshine duration of 80.80 h and a radiation value of 44,810.8 W/m<sup>2</sup>-year. Antalya is followed by Mardin location (monthly average sunshine duration of 96.10 h and radiation of 59,487.9 W/m<sup>2</sup>-year) and Karaman (monthly average sunshine duration of 94.40 h and radiation of 58,847.1 W/m<sup>2</sup>-year).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Efficiency\",\"volume\":\"17 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Efficiency\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-024-10226-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Efficiency","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-024-10226-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Solar energy technical feasibility comparison: an alternative proposal for the Industry
In this study, 11 provinces with more than 1 MW solar power plants (SPP) in Turkey have been examined in terms of global solar radiation and power produced. The main objective of this study is to underline the serious differences in technical feasibility analysis conducted by the academic circles and solar energy industrial environments in Turkey. The obtained results were compared with the values operated by the private installation companies in the industry, these were interpreted, and the disagreements were revealed. Moreover, the study reveals some gaps in technical feasibility analysis, which the sector professionals usually ignore in the field. The findings were evaluated in monthly, annual, and seasonal time zones. The present study showed that the analysis, to which private companies in the field refer, is insufficient and the parameters that would guide the investor in detail could not be obtained. More detailed prospection has been obtained within the scope of this study.
Considering the whole of our findings, while the most advantageous location for investing in SPPs in Antalya with a total of 97.50 h monthly average sunshine duration and radiation of 59,599.6 W/m2 throughout the year, the most disadvantaged location is Kahramanmaraş with a total monthly average sunshine duration of 80.80 h and a radiation value of 44,810.8 W/m2-year. Antalya is followed by Mardin location (monthly average sunshine duration of 96.10 h and radiation of 59,487.9 W/m2-year) and Karaman (monthly average sunshine duration of 94.40 h and radiation of 58,847.1 W/m2-year).
期刊介绍：
The journal Energy Efficiency covers wide-ranging aspects of energy efficiency in the residential, tertiary, industrial and transport sectors. Coverage includes a number of different topics and disciplines including energy efficiency policies at local, regional, national and international levels; long term impact of energy efficiency; technologies to improve energy efficiency; consumer behavior and the dynamics of consumption; socio-economic impacts of energy efficiency measures; energy efficiency as a virtual utility; transportation issues; building issues; energy management systems and energy services; energy planning and risk assessment; energy efficiency in developing countries and economies in transition; non-energy benefits of energy efficiency and opportunities for policy integration; energy education and training, and emerging technologies. See Aims and Scope for more details.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
