使用平衡练习辅助机器人对患有心血管疾病的老年人进行心脏康复治疗的随机对照试验

Akihiro Hirashiki, A. Shimizu, Takahiro Kamihara, M. Kokubo, Kakeru Hashimoto, I. Ueda, Kenji Sato, Koki Kawamura, N. Itoh, T. Murohara, Hitoshi Kagaya, Izumi Kondo
{"title":"使用平衡练习辅助机器人对患有心血管疾病的老年人进行心脏康复治疗的随机对照试验","authors":"Akihiro Hirashiki, A. Shimizu, Takahiro Kamihara, M. Kokubo, Kakeru Hashimoto, I. Ueda, Kenji Sato, Koki Kawamura, N. Itoh, T. Murohara, Hitoshi Kagaya, Izumi Kondo","doi":"10.3390/jcdd11050133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recent studies have investigated the effects of exercise on the functional capacity of older adults; training with a balance exercise assist robot (BEAR) effectively improves posture. This study compared the clinical safety and efficacy of training using BEAR video games to conventional resistance training in older adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: Ninety patients (mean age: 78 years) hospitalized due to worsening CVD were randomized to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) Group R (conventional resistance training) or Group B (training using BEAR). After appropriate therapy, patients underwent laboratory testing and functional evaluation using the timed up-and-go test (TUG), short physical performance battery (SPPB), and functional independence measure (FIM) just before discharge and 4 months after CR. The rates of CVD readmission, cardiac death, and fall-related fractures were monitored. Results: BEAR had no adverse effects during exercise. At 4 months, TUG and SPPB improved significantly in both groups, with no significant difference between them. FIM motor and the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index were significantly improved in Group B versus Group R. There was no significant difference in cardiac events and fall-related fractures between the two groups. Conclusion: CR with BEAR is safe and comparable to conventional resistance training for improving balance in older adults with CVD.","PeriodicalId":502527,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"6 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Controlled Trial of Cardiac Rehabilitation Using the Balance Exercise Assist Robot in Older Adults with Cardiovascular Disease\",\"authors\":\"Akihiro Hirashiki, A. Shimizu, Takahiro Kamihara, M. Kokubo, Kakeru Hashimoto, I. Ueda, Kenji Sato, Koki Kawamura, N. Itoh, T. Murohara, Hitoshi Kagaya, Izumi Kondo\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcdd11050133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Recent studies have investigated the effects of exercise on the functional capacity of older adults; training with a balance exercise assist robot (BEAR) effectively improves posture. This study compared the clinical safety and efficacy of training using BEAR video games to conventional resistance training in older adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: Ninety patients (mean age: 78 years) hospitalized due to worsening CVD were randomized to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) Group R (conventional resistance training) or Group B (training using BEAR). After appropriate therapy, patients underwent laboratory testing and functional evaluation using the timed up-and-go test (TUG), short physical performance battery (SPPB), and functional independence measure (FIM) just before discharge and 4 months after CR. The rates of CVD readmission, cardiac death, and fall-related fractures were monitored. Results: BEAR had no adverse effects during exercise. At 4 months, TUG and SPPB improved significantly in both groups, with no significant difference between them. FIM motor and the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index were significantly improved in Group B versus Group R. There was no significant difference in cardiac events and fall-related fractures between the two groups. Conclusion: CR with BEAR is safe and comparable to conventional resistance training for improving balance in older adults with CVD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease\",\"volume\":\"6 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11050133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11050133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近的研究调查了运动对老年人功能能力的影响;使用平衡运动辅助机器人(BEAR)进行训练可有效改善姿势。本研究比较了使用 BEAR 视频游戏和传统阻力训练对患有心血管疾病(CVD)的老年人的临床安全性和有效性。研究方法90名因心血管疾病恶化而住院的患者(平均年龄78岁)被随机分配到心脏康复(CR)R组(传统阻力训练)或B组(使用BEAR进行训练)。在接受适当的治疗后,患者在出院前和 CR 结束后 4 个月接受了实验室检测,并使用定时起立行走测试 (TUG)、短期体能测试 (SPPB) 和功能独立性测量 (FIM) 进行了功能评估。对心血管疾病再入院率、心源性死亡和跌倒相关骨折的发生率进行了监测。结果:BEAR 在运动过程中无不良反应。4 个月后,两组的 TUG 和 SPPB 均有明显改善,无显著差异。B 组与 R 组相比,FIM 运动和老年营养风险指数均有明显改善。结论在改善患有心血管疾病的老年人的平衡能力方面,使用 BEAR 进行 CR 是安全的,而且效果与传统阻力训练相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomized Controlled Trial of Cardiac Rehabilitation Using the Balance Exercise Assist Robot in Older Adults with Cardiovascular Disease
Background: Recent studies have investigated the effects of exercise on the functional capacity of older adults; training with a balance exercise assist robot (BEAR) effectively improves posture. This study compared the clinical safety and efficacy of training using BEAR video games to conventional resistance training in older adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: Ninety patients (mean age: 78 years) hospitalized due to worsening CVD were randomized to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) Group R (conventional resistance training) or Group B (training using BEAR). After appropriate therapy, patients underwent laboratory testing and functional evaluation using the timed up-and-go test (TUG), short physical performance battery (SPPB), and functional independence measure (FIM) just before discharge and 4 months after CR. The rates of CVD readmission, cardiac death, and fall-related fractures were monitored. Results: BEAR had no adverse effects during exercise. At 4 months, TUG and SPPB improved significantly in both groups, with no significant difference between them. FIM motor and the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index were significantly improved in Group B versus Group R. There was no significant difference in cardiac events and fall-related fractures between the two groups. Conclusion: CR with BEAR is safe and comparable to conventional resistance training for improving balance in older adults with CVD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信