杜兴氏肌肉萎缩症上肢功能分类的有效性

Yuta Miyazaki, T. Hara, Kazuki Hagiwara, Takuya Nakamura, Akiko Kamimura, Eri Takeshita, Hirofumi Komaki, Katsuhiro Mizuno, Tetsuya Tsuji, Masahiro Abo
{"title":"杜兴氏肌肉萎缩症上肢功能分类的有效性","authors":"Yuta Miyazaki, T. Hara, Kazuki Hagiwara, Takuya Nakamura, Akiko Kamimura, Eri Takeshita, Hirofumi Komaki, Katsuhiro Mizuno, Tetsuya Tsuji, Masahiro Abo","doi":"10.2490/prm.20240016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives: Some upper-limb function assessments can evaluate treatments in the non-ambulatory stage of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The Functional Classification of the Upper Extremities (FCUE) was developed for DMD in Japan. The FCUE is easier to use than the Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) and is more detailed than the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale. This study aimed to determine the concurrent validity of FCUE with other methods of assessment for DMD. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 39 boys with DMD from the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry to evaluate the concurrent validity of the FCUE and PUL using non-parametric Spearman rank correlation (ρ). We also determined the concurrent validity of the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale and PUL for comparison. Results: The ρ value between the FCUE and PUL was −0.914 (P<0.001). The FCUE showed robust concurrent validity with the PUL. That correlation between the FCUE and Brooke Upper Extremity Scale gave a ρ value of −0.854 (P<0.001). Conclusions: The FCUE had a higher concurrent validity with the PUL than with the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale. The FCUE is considered a valid assessment tool of upper-limb function in boys with DMD. Selecting the best assessment method depends on the severity of the patient’s condition and a balance between assessment accuracy and evaluation time.","PeriodicalId":74584,"journal":{"name":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","volume":"80 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of the Functional Classification of the Upper Extremities for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy\",\"authors\":\"Yuta Miyazaki, T. Hara, Kazuki Hagiwara, Takuya Nakamura, Akiko Kamimura, Eri Takeshita, Hirofumi Komaki, Katsuhiro Mizuno, Tetsuya Tsuji, Masahiro Abo\",\"doi\":\"10.2490/prm.20240016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objectives: Some upper-limb function assessments can evaluate treatments in the non-ambulatory stage of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The Functional Classification of the Upper Extremities (FCUE) was developed for DMD in Japan. The FCUE is easier to use than the Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) and is more detailed than the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale. This study aimed to determine the concurrent validity of FCUE with other methods of assessment for DMD. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 39 boys with DMD from the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry to evaluate the concurrent validity of the FCUE and PUL using non-parametric Spearman rank correlation (ρ). We also determined the concurrent validity of the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale and PUL for comparison. Results: The ρ value between the FCUE and PUL was −0.914 (P<0.001). The FCUE showed robust concurrent validity with the PUL. That correlation between the FCUE and Brooke Upper Extremity Scale gave a ρ value of −0.854 (P<0.001). Conclusions: The FCUE had a higher concurrent validity with the PUL than with the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale. The FCUE is considered a valid assessment tool of upper-limb function in boys with DMD. Selecting the best assessment method depends on the severity of the patient’s condition and a balance between assessment accuracy and evaluation time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in rehabilitation medicine\",\"volume\":\"80 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in rehabilitation medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20240016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20240016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 目的:一些上肢功能评估可以对杜氏肌营养不良症(DMD)非行走阶段的治疗进行评估。上肢功能分类(FCUE)是日本针对 DMD 而开发的。FCUE 比上肢功能量表 (PUL) 更容易使用,比布鲁克上肢功能量表 (Brooke Upper Extremity Scale) 更详细。本研究旨在确定 FCUE 与其他 DMD 评估方法的并发有效性。方法:这项回顾性研究回顾了国家神经病学和精神病学中心的 39 名 DMD 男孩的病历,使用非参数斯皮尔曼秩相关性 (ρ) 评估了 FCUE 和 PUL 的并发有效性。我们还测定了布鲁克上肢量表和 PUL 的并发有效性,以进行比较。结果FCUE和PUL之间的ρ值为-0.914(P<0.001)。FCUE与PUL显示出很强的并发有效性。FCUE与布鲁克上肢量表之间的相关性ρ值为-0.854(P<0.001)。结论与布鲁克上肢量表相比,功能性评定UE与PUL的并发效度更高。FCUE 被认为是评估 DMD 男孩上肢功能的有效工具。选择最佳评估方法取决于患者病情的严重程度以及评估准确性和评估时间之间的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity of the Functional Classification of the Upper Extremities for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
ABSTRACT Objectives: Some upper-limb function assessments can evaluate treatments in the non-ambulatory stage of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The Functional Classification of the Upper Extremities (FCUE) was developed for DMD in Japan. The FCUE is easier to use than the Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) and is more detailed than the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale. This study aimed to determine the concurrent validity of FCUE with other methods of assessment for DMD. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 39 boys with DMD from the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry to evaluate the concurrent validity of the FCUE and PUL using non-parametric Spearman rank correlation (ρ). We also determined the concurrent validity of the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale and PUL for comparison. Results: The ρ value between the FCUE and PUL was −0.914 (P<0.001). The FCUE showed robust concurrent validity with the PUL. That correlation between the FCUE and Brooke Upper Extremity Scale gave a ρ value of −0.854 (P<0.001). Conclusions: The FCUE had a higher concurrent validity with the PUL than with the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale. The FCUE is considered a valid assessment tool of upper-limb function in boys with DMD. Selecting the best assessment method depends on the severity of the patient’s condition and a balance between assessment accuracy and evaluation time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信