探究与照顾相关的早期逆境后的情感语义记忆内容。

IF 3.1 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Anna Vannucci, Andrea Fields, Paul A. Bloom, Nicolas L. Camacho, Tricia Choy, Amaesha Durazi, Syntia Hadis, Chelsea Harmon, Charlotte Heleniak, Michelle VanTieghem, Mary Dozier, Michael P. Milham, Simona Ghetti, Nim Tottenham
{"title":"探究与照顾相关的早期逆境后的情感语义记忆内容。","authors":"Anna Vannucci,&nbsp;Andrea Fields,&nbsp;Paul A. Bloom,&nbsp;Nicolas L. Camacho,&nbsp;Tricia Choy,&nbsp;Amaesha Durazi,&nbsp;Syntia Hadis,&nbsp;Chelsea Harmon,&nbsp;Charlotte Heleniak,&nbsp;Michelle VanTieghem,&nbsp;Mary Dozier,&nbsp;Michael P. Milham,&nbsp;Simona Ghetti,&nbsp;Nim Tottenham","doi":"10.1111/desc.13518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Cognitive science has demonstrated that we construct knowledge about the world by abstracting patterns from routinely encountered experiences and storing them as semantic memories. This preregistered study tested the hypothesis that caregiving-related early adversities (crEAs) shape affective semantic memories to reflect the content of those adverse interpersonal-affective experiences. We also tested the hypothesis that because affective semantic memories may continue to evolve in response to later-occurring positive experiences, child-perceived attachment security will inform their content. The sample comprised 160 children (ages 6–12 at Visit 1; 87F/73 M), 66% of whom experienced crEAs (<i>n </i>= 105). At Visit 1, crEA exposure prior to study enrollment was operationalized as parental-reports endorsing a history of crEAs (abuse/neglect, permanent/significant parent-child separation); while child-reports assessed concurrent attachment security. A false memory task was administered online ∼2.5 years later (Visit 2) to probe the content of affective semantic memories–specifically attachment schemas. Results showed that crEA exposure (vs. no exposure) was associated with a higher likelihood of falsely endorsing insecure (vs. secure) schema scenes. Attachment security moderated the association between crEA exposure and insecure schema-based false recognition. Findings suggest that interpersonal-affective semantic schemas include representations of parent-child interactions that may capture the quality of one's own attachment experiences and that these representations shape how children remember attachment-relevant narrative events. Findings are also consistent with the hypothesis that these affective semantic memories can be modified by later experiences. Moving forward, the approach taken in this study provides a means of operationalizing Bowlby's notion of internal working models within a cognitive neuroscience framework.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Affective semantic memories representing insecure schema knowledge (<i>child needs</i> + <i>needs-not-met</i>) may be more salient, elaborated, and persistent among youths exposed to early caregiving adversity.</li>\n \n <li>All youths, irrespective of early caregiving adversity exposure, may possess affective semantic memories that represent knowledge of secure schemas (<i>child needs</i> + <i>needs-met</i>).</li>\n \n <li>Establishing secure relationships with parents following early-occurring caregiving adversity may attenuate the expression of insecure semantic memories, suggesting potential malleability.</li>\n \n <li>Affective semantic memories include schema representations of parent-child interactions that may capture the quality of one's own attachment experiences and shape how youths remember attachment-relevant events.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probing the content of affective semantic memory following caregiving-related early adversity\",\"authors\":\"Anna Vannucci,&nbsp;Andrea Fields,&nbsp;Paul A. Bloom,&nbsp;Nicolas L. Camacho,&nbsp;Tricia Choy,&nbsp;Amaesha Durazi,&nbsp;Syntia Hadis,&nbsp;Chelsea Harmon,&nbsp;Charlotte Heleniak,&nbsp;Michelle VanTieghem,&nbsp;Mary Dozier,&nbsp;Michael P. Milham,&nbsp;Simona Ghetti,&nbsp;Nim Tottenham\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/desc.13518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Cognitive science has demonstrated that we construct knowledge about the world by abstracting patterns from routinely encountered experiences and storing them as semantic memories. This preregistered study tested the hypothesis that caregiving-related early adversities (crEAs) shape affective semantic memories to reflect the content of those adverse interpersonal-affective experiences. We also tested the hypothesis that because affective semantic memories may continue to evolve in response to later-occurring positive experiences, child-perceived attachment security will inform their content. The sample comprised 160 children (ages 6–12 at Visit 1; 87F/73 M), 66% of whom experienced crEAs (<i>n </i>= 105). At Visit 1, crEA exposure prior to study enrollment was operationalized as parental-reports endorsing a history of crEAs (abuse/neglect, permanent/significant parent-child separation); while child-reports assessed concurrent attachment security. A false memory task was administered online ∼2.5 years later (Visit 2) to probe the content of affective semantic memories–specifically attachment schemas. Results showed that crEA exposure (vs. no exposure) was associated with a higher likelihood of falsely endorsing insecure (vs. secure) schema scenes. Attachment security moderated the association between crEA exposure and insecure schema-based false recognition. Findings suggest that interpersonal-affective semantic schemas include representations of parent-child interactions that may capture the quality of one's own attachment experiences and that these representations shape how children remember attachment-relevant narrative events. Findings are also consistent with the hypothesis that these affective semantic memories can be modified by later experiences. Moving forward, the approach taken in this study provides a means of operationalizing Bowlby's notion of internal working models within a cognitive neuroscience framework.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Research Highlights</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Affective semantic memories representing insecure schema knowledge (<i>child needs</i> + <i>needs-not-met</i>) may be more salient, elaborated, and persistent among youths exposed to early caregiving adversity.</li>\\n \\n <li>All youths, irrespective of early caregiving adversity exposure, may possess affective semantic memories that represent knowledge of secure schemas (<i>child needs</i> + <i>needs-met</i>).</li>\\n \\n <li>Establishing secure relationships with parents following early-occurring caregiving adversity may attenuate the expression of insecure semantic memories, suggesting potential malleability.</li>\\n \\n <li>Affective semantic memories include schema representations of parent-child interactions that may capture the quality of one's own attachment experiences and shape how youths remember attachment-relevant events.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Science\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.13518\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.13518","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知科学已经证明,我们通过从日常经验中抽象出模式并将其存储为语义记忆,从而构建出关于世界的知识。这项预先登记的研究对以下假设进行了测试:与护理相关的早期逆境(crEAs)会塑造情感语义记忆,以反映这些不利的人际情感经历的内容。我们还测试了这样一个假设:由于情感语义记忆可能会随着日后出现的积极经历而不断发展,因此儿童感知到的依恋安全感会影响其内容。样本包括 160 名儿童(访问 1 时年龄为 6-12 岁;87 女/73 男),其中 66% 的儿童经历过 crEA(n = 105)。在访问1时,研究注册前的crEA暴露是指父母对crEAs(虐待/忽视、永久/重大亲子分离)历史的认可报告;而儿童的报告则评估了同时存在的依恋安全感。2.5年后(访问2)进行在线假记忆任务,以探究情感语义记忆的内容,特别是依恋图式。结果显示,暴露于crEA(相对于未暴露)与虚假认可不安全(相对于安全)图式场景的可能性较高有关。依恋安全感调节了crEA暴露与基于不安全图式的错误识别之间的关联。研究结果表明,人际情感语义图式包括亲子互动的表征,这些表征可能反映了一个人自身依恋经历的质量,而这些表征会影响儿童如何记住与依恋相关的叙事事件。研究结果也与这些情感语义记忆可被后来的经历所改变的假设相一致。展望未来,本研究采用的方法为在认知神经科学框架内落实鲍尔比的内部工作模型概念提供了一种手段。研究亮点:代表不安全图式知识(儿童需求+未满足的需求)的情感语义记忆可能在遭受早期照顾逆境的青少年中更加突出、详细和持久。所有的青少年,无论是否处于早期照料逆境,都可能拥有代表安全图式知识(儿童需求+需求得到满足)的情感语义记忆。在早期出现照顾逆境后,与父母建立安全关系可能会减轻不安全语义记忆的表达,这表明它具有潜在的可塑性。情感语义记忆包括亲子互动的图式表征,这些图式表征可能会反映一个人自身依恋经历的质量,并影响青少年对依恋相关事件的记忆方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Probing the content of affective semantic memory following caregiving-related early adversity

Cognitive science has demonstrated that we construct knowledge about the world by abstracting patterns from routinely encountered experiences and storing them as semantic memories. This preregistered study tested the hypothesis that caregiving-related early adversities (crEAs) shape affective semantic memories to reflect the content of those adverse interpersonal-affective experiences. We also tested the hypothesis that because affective semantic memories may continue to evolve in response to later-occurring positive experiences, child-perceived attachment security will inform their content. The sample comprised 160 children (ages 6–12 at Visit 1; 87F/73 M), 66% of whom experienced crEAs (= 105). At Visit 1, crEA exposure prior to study enrollment was operationalized as parental-reports endorsing a history of crEAs (abuse/neglect, permanent/significant parent-child separation); while child-reports assessed concurrent attachment security. A false memory task was administered online ∼2.5 years later (Visit 2) to probe the content of affective semantic memories–specifically attachment schemas. Results showed that crEA exposure (vs. no exposure) was associated with a higher likelihood of falsely endorsing insecure (vs. secure) schema scenes. Attachment security moderated the association between crEA exposure and insecure schema-based false recognition. Findings suggest that interpersonal-affective semantic schemas include representations of parent-child interactions that may capture the quality of one's own attachment experiences and that these representations shape how children remember attachment-relevant narrative events. Findings are also consistent with the hypothesis that these affective semantic memories can be modified by later experiences. Moving forward, the approach taken in this study provides a means of operationalizing Bowlby's notion of internal working models within a cognitive neuroscience framework.

Research Highlights

  • Affective semantic memories representing insecure schema knowledge (child needs + needs-not-met) may be more salient, elaborated, and persistent among youths exposed to early caregiving adversity.
  • All youths, irrespective of early caregiving adversity exposure, may possess affective semantic memories that represent knowledge of secure schemas (child needs + needs-met).
  • Establishing secure relationships with parents following early-occurring caregiving adversity may attenuate the expression of insecure semantic memories, suggesting potential malleability.
  • Affective semantic memories include schema representations of parent-child interactions that may capture the quality of one's own attachment experiences and shape how youths remember attachment-relevant events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信