Hamed Ghomashchi , Jakson Paterson , Alison C. Novak , Tilak Dutta
{"title":"使用 YOLOv4 和深度 SORT 算法估算行人在过街路口的行走速度:原理验证","authors":"Hamed Ghomashchi , Jakson Paterson , Alison C. Novak , Tilak Dutta","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is evidence that existing standards for signal timing do not provide enough time for many pedestrians to safely cross intersections. Yet, current methods for studying this problem rely on inefficient manual observations. The objective of this work was to determine if the YOLOv4 and Deep SORT computer vision algorithms have the potential to be incorporated into automated measurement systems to measure and compare pedestrian walking speeds at one-stage and two-stage street crossings captured in birds-eye-view video. Walking speed was estimated for 1018 pedestrians at single-stage (591 pedestrians) and two-stage (427 pedestrians) street crossings. Pedestrians in the one-stage crossing were found to be significantly slower than pedestrians who crossed the two-stage crossing in one signal (<em>1.19 ± 0.50 vs. 1.31 ± 0.</em>49 m/s<em>, p < 0.001</em>). This proof of principle study demonstrated that the YOLOv4 and Deep SORT approaches are promising for estimating pedestrian walking speed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 104292"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687024000693/pdfft?md5=fb145fb1c5e98b5270b08ddbbe8af82f&pid=1-s2.0-S0003687024000693-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating pedestrian walking speed at street crossings using the YOLOv4 and deep SORT algorithms: Proof of principle\",\"authors\":\"Hamed Ghomashchi , Jakson Paterson , Alison C. Novak , Tilak Dutta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There is evidence that existing standards for signal timing do not provide enough time for many pedestrians to safely cross intersections. Yet, current methods for studying this problem rely on inefficient manual observations. The objective of this work was to determine if the YOLOv4 and Deep SORT computer vision algorithms have the potential to be incorporated into automated measurement systems to measure and compare pedestrian walking speeds at one-stage and two-stage street crossings captured in birds-eye-view video. Walking speed was estimated for 1018 pedestrians at single-stage (591 pedestrians) and two-stage (427 pedestrians) street crossings. Pedestrians in the one-stage crossing were found to be significantly slower than pedestrians who crossed the two-stage crossing in one signal (<em>1.19 ± 0.50 vs. 1.31 ± 0.</em>49 m/s<em>, p < 0.001</em>). This proof of principle study demonstrated that the YOLOv4 and Deep SORT approaches are promising for estimating pedestrian walking speed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"119 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687024000693/pdfft?md5=fb145fb1c5e98b5270b08ddbbe8af82f&pid=1-s2.0-S0003687024000693-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687024000693\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687024000693","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
有证据表明,现有的信号配时标准无法为许多行人提供足够的时间安全通过交叉路口。然而,目前研究这一问题的方法依赖于效率低下的人工观察。这项工作的目的是确定 YOLOv4 和 Deep SORT 计算机视觉算法是否有潜力融入自动测量系统,以测量和比较鸟瞰视频中捕捉到的一段式和两段式过街行人的步行速度。在单级(591 名行人)和双级(427 名行人)过街处,对 1018 名行人的步行速度进行了估算。结果发现,单段式过街行人的步行速度明显低于在一个信号灯下通过双段式过街的行人(1.19 ± 0.50 vs. 1.31 ± 0.49 m/s,p <0.001)。这项原理验证研究表明,YOLOv4 和 Deep SORT 方法在估算行人步行速度方面大有可为。
Estimating pedestrian walking speed at street crossings using the YOLOv4 and deep SORT algorithms: Proof of principle
There is evidence that existing standards for signal timing do not provide enough time for many pedestrians to safely cross intersections. Yet, current methods for studying this problem rely on inefficient manual observations. The objective of this work was to determine if the YOLOv4 and Deep SORT computer vision algorithms have the potential to be incorporated into automated measurement systems to measure and compare pedestrian walking speeds at one-stage and two-stage street crossings captured in birds-eye-view video. Walking speed was estimated for 1018 pedestrians at single-stage (591 pedestrians) and two-stage (427 pedestrians) street crossings. Pedestrians in the one-stage crossing were found to be significantly slower than pedestrians who crossed the two-stage crossing in one signal (1.19 ± 0.50 vs. 1.31 ± 0.49 m/s, p < 0.001). This proof of principle study demonstrated that the YOLOv4 and Deep SORT approaches are promising for estimating pedestrian walking speed.
期刊介绍:
Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.