分析:研究设计导致了氯胺酮-ECT试验的差异

{"title":"分析:研究设计导致了氯胺酮-ECT试验的差异","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/pu.31162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Differences in study population characteristics and treatment modalities were largely responsible for the discordant findings between the two adequately powered trials that have compared ketamine treatment and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for major depressive disorder, an analysis has concluded. Remission rates with ECT treatment diverged significantly, at 63% in one of the studies and 22% in the other. Results of the analysis were published online Dec. 19, 2023 in the <i>International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":22275,"journal":{"name":"The Brown University Psychopharmacology Update","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis: Study design contributed to differences in ketamine-ECT trials\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pu.31162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Differences in study population characteristics and treatment modalities were largely responsible for the discordant findings between the two adequately powered trials that have compared ketamine treatment and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for major depressive disorder, an analysis has concluded. Remission rates with ECT treatment diverged significantly, at 63% in one of the studies and 22% in the other. Results of the analysis were published online Dec. 19, 2023 in the <i>International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Brown University Psychopharmacology Update\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Brown University Psychopharmacology Update\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pu.31162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Brown University Psychopharmacology Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pu.31162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一项分析得出结论说,研究人群特征和治疗方式的差异在很大程度上导致了两项有充分证据支持的试验结果不一致,这两项试验对氯胺酮治疗和电休克疗法(ECT)治疗重度抑郁症进行了比较。ECT治疗的缓解率差异很大,其中一项研究的缓解率为63%,另一项研究的缓解率为22%。分析结果于2023年12月19日在线发表在《国际神经精神药理学杂志》(International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology)上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis: Study design contributed to differences in ketamine-ECT trials

Differences in study population characteristics and treatment modalities were largely responsible for the discordant findings between the two adequately powered trials that have compared ketamine treatment and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for major depressive disorder, an analysis has concluded. Remission rates with ECT treatment diverged significantly, at 63% in one of the studies and 22% in the other. Results of the analysis were published online Dec. 19, 2023 in the International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信