Michael P. D'Antonio, Carol L. Hotton, Selena Y. Smith, Peter R. Crane, Fabiany Herrera
{"title":"重建神秘的宾夕法尼亚锥体,揭示其与 Sphenophyllales 的关系","authors":"Michael P. D'Antonio, Carol L. Hotton, Selena Y. Smith, Peter R. Crane, Fabiany Herrera","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.16321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>We studied the 3D morphology of a small, well-preserved cone from the Pennsylvanian Mazon Creek Lagerstätte to characterize its structure and determine its systematic affinity. Previously tentatively assigned to the enigmatic <i>Tetraphyllostrobus</i>, we show that it differs in key respects from that genus as described.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We systematically compared the new fossil with relevant Paleozoic cone genera and employed advanced imaging techniques, including scanning electron microscopy, Airyscan confocal super-resolution microscopy, optical microscopy, and X-ray microcomputed tomography to visualize and reconstruct the fossil cone in 3D.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The analyses demonstrate unequivocally that the sporophylls of the new Mazon Creek cone are arranged in whorls of six and have characters typical of Sphenophyllales, including epidermal cells with undulatory margins and in situ spores assignable to <i>Columinisporites</i>. The combination of characters, including sporophyll arrangement, anatomy, and spore type, supports the establishment of <i>Hexaphyllostrobus kostorhysii</i> gen. et sp. nov. within Sphenophyllales. Furthermore, we show that <i>Tetraphyllostrobus</i>, although originally described as possessing smooth monolete spores, actually possesses <i>Columinisporites</i>-type spores, indicating that it, too, was most likely a sphenophyll.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The recognition of <i>Hexaphyllostrobus</i> contributes to our knowledge of Pennsylvanian sphenophyll diversity, and in particular increases the number of species with in situ <i>Columinisporites</i>-type spores. Attribution of <i>Hexaphyllostrobus</i> to Sphenophyllales calls into question current interpretations of <i>Tetraphyllostrobus</i> suggesting that future research on better-preserved macrofossil material may demonstrate a sphenophyllalean relationship.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconstruction of an enigmatic Pennsylvanian cone reveals a relationship to Sphenophyllales\",\"authors\":\"Michael P. D'Antonio, Carol L. Hotton, Selena Y. Smith, Peter R. Crane, Fabiany Herrera\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajb2.16321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Premise</h3>\\n \\n <p>We studied the 3D morphology of a small, well-preserved cone from the Pennsylvanian Mazon Creek Lagerstätte to characterize its structure and determine its systematic affinity. Previously tentatively assigned to the enigmatic <i>Tetraphyllostrobus</i>, we show that it differs in key respects from that genus as described.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We systematically compared the new fossil with relevant Paleozoic cone genera and employed advanced imaging techniques, including scanning electron microscopy, Airyscan confocal super-resolution microscopy, optical microscopy, and X-ray microcomputed tomography to visualize and reconstruct the fossil cone in 3D.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The analyses demonstrate unequivocally that the sporophylls of the new Mazon Creek cone are arranged in whorls of six and have characters typical of Sphenophyllales, including epidermal cells with undulatory margins and in situ spores assignable to <i>Columinisporites</i>. The combination of characters, including sporophyll arrangement, anatomy, and spore type, supports the establishment of <i>Hexaphyllostrobus kostorhysii</i> gen. et sp. nov. within Sphenophyllales. Furthermore, we show that <i>Tetraphyllostrobus</i>, although originally described as possessing smooth monolete spores, actually possesses <i>Columinisporites</i>-type spores, indicating that it, too, was most likely a sphenophyll.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The recognition of <i>Hexaphyllostrobus</i> contributes to our knowledge of Pennsylvanian sphenophyll diversity, and in particular increases the number of species with in situ <i>Columinisporites</i>-type spores. Attribution of <i>Hexaphyllostrobus</i> to Sphenophyllales calls into question current interpretations of <i>Tetraphyllostrobus</i> suggesting that future research on better-preserved macrofossil material may demonstrate a sphenophyllalean relationship.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Botany\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.16321\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.16321","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reconstruction of an enigmatic Pennsylvanian cone reveals a relationship to Sphenophyllales
Premise
We studied the 3D morphology of a small, well-preserved cone from the Pennsylvanian Mazon Creek Lagerstätte to characterize its structure and determine its systematic affinity. Previously tentatively assigned to the enigmatic Tetraphyllostrobus, we show that it differs in key respects from that genus as described.
Methods
We systematically compared the new fossil with relevant Paleozoic cone genera and employed advanced imaging techniques, including scanning electron microscopy, Airyscan confocal super-resolution microscopy, optical microscopy, and X-ray microcomputed tomography to visualize and reconstruct the fossil cone in 3D.
Results
The analyses demonstrate unequivocally that the sporophylls of the new Mazon Creek cone are arranged in whorls of six and have characters typical of Sphenophyllales, including epidermal cells with undulatory margins and in situ spores assignable to Columinisporites. The combination of characters, including sporophyll arrangement, anatomy, and spore type, supports the establishment of Hexaphyllostrobus kostorhysii gen. et sp. nov. within Sphenophyllales. Furthermore, we show that Tetraphyllostrobus, although originally described as possessing smooth monolete spores, actually possesses Columinisporites-type spores, indicating that it, too, was most likely a sphenophyll.
Conclusions
The recognition of Hexaphyllostrobus contributes to our knowledge of Pennsylvanian sphenophyll diversity, and in particular increases the number of species with in situ Columinisporites-type spores. Attribution of Hexaphyllostrobus to Sphenophyllales calls into question current interpretations of Tetraphyllostrobus suggesting that future research on better-preserved macrofossil material may demonstrate a sphenophyllalean relationship.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.