土著毛利人患精神病的体制途径:对经验的定性探索

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jenni Manuel , Sue Crengle , Marie Crowe , Cameron Lacey , Ruth Cunningham , Mauterangimarie Clark , Frederieke S. Petrović-van der Deen , Richard Porter , Suzanne Pitama
{"title":"土著毛利人患精神病的体制途径:对经验的定性探索","authors":"Jenni Manuel ,&nbsp;Sue Crengle ,&nbsp;Marie Crowe ,&nbsp;Cameron Lacey ,&nbsp;Ruth Cunningham ,&nbsp;Mauterangimarie Clark ,&nbsp;Frederieke S. Petrović-van der Deen ,&nbsp;Richard Porter ,&nbsp;Suzanne Pitama","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Inequities in the incidence and outcomes of first episode psychosis (FEP) for Indigenous peoples are impacted by multiple institutional systems. This study examines Indigenous experiences of these systems to gain an understanding of how to improve institutional responses to FEP inequity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Critical race theory informed the methods used. Twenty-three participants participated in four focus group interviews, and thirteen individual interviews, including nine Māori youth and young adults with FEP, ten family members, and four Māori health professionals. Participants were asked about lifetime experiences of institutions (health, social, and criminal-justice). An adapted WHO framework for addressing mental health inequities was used to organize and analyse the first round of structural coding, followed by descriptive and pattern coding.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two themes were identified. The first theme signposted opportunities for institutional intervention. Participants critique being processed quickly through institutions that are driven by socio-political agendas, namely perceived risk, threat or crisis. Subsequently, opportunities for meaningful intervention were missed. The second theme identified scope for family orientated responses across sectors. Participants described short-term social interventions and institutional structures that focused on individuals rather than families, emphasizing the need to broaden cross-sector scope to structural interventions for families.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The findings highlight institutional responses are focused on organisational drivers and downstream issues, that fail to address the fabric of the family social-environmental conditions that maintain Indigenous exposure to psychosis risk and poor outcomes. A pathway to equity would require a shared framework of social responsibility across sectors, that targets structural factors responsive to Indigenous family needs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100435"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000441/pdfft?md5=ad370c97d72c1abb0714b79598f29e27&pid=1-s2.0-S2667321524000441-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional pathways to psychosis for Indigenous Māori: A qualitative exploration of experiences\",\"authors\":\"Jenni Manuel ,&nbsp;Sue Crengle ,&nbsp;Marie Crowe ,&nbsp;Cameron Lacey ,&nbsp;Ruth Cunningham ,&nbsp;Mauterangimarie Clark ,&nbsp;Frederieke S. Petrović-van der Deen ,&nbsp;Richard Porter ,&nbsp;Suzanne Pitama\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Inequities in the incidence and outcomes of first episode psychosis (FEP) for Indigenous peoples are impacted by multiple institutional systems. This study examines Indigenous experiences of these systems to gain an understanding of how to improve institutional responses to FEP inequity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Critical race theory informed the methods used. Twenty-three participants participated in four focus group interviews, and thirteen individual interviews, including nine Māori youth and young adults with FEP, ten family members, and four Māori health professionals. Participants were asked about lifetime experiences of institutions (health, social, and criminal-justice). An adapted WHO framework for addressing mental health inequities was used to organize and analyse the first round of structural coding, followed by descriptive and pattern coding.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two themes were identified. The first theme signposted opportunities for institutional intervention. Participants critique being processed quickly through institutions that are driven by socio-political agendas, namely perceived risk, threat or crisis. Subsequently, opportunities for meaningful intervention were missed. The second theme identified scope for family orientated responses across sectors. Participants described short-term social interventions and institutional structures that focused on individuals rather than families, emphasizing the need to broaden cross-sector scope to structural interventions for families.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The findings highlight institutional responses are focused on organisational drivers and downstream issues, that fail to address the fabric of the family social-environmental conditions that maintain Indigenous exposure to psychosis risk and poor outcomes. A pathway to equity would require a shared framework of social responsibility across sectors, that targets structural factors responsive to Indigenous family needs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000441/pdfft?md5=ad370c97d72c1abb0714b79598f29e27&pid=1-s2.0-S2667321524000441-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景原住民首次发病精神病(FEP)的发病率和结果的不平等受到多种制度体系的影响。本研究探讨了原住民在这些制度中的经历,以了解如何改进制度来应对首次发病精神病(FEP)的不公平现象。23 名参与者参加了四次焦点小组访谈和 13 次个人访谈,其中包括 9 名患有家庭教育障碍的毛利青年和年轻成年人、10 名家庭成员和 4 名毛利卫生专业人员。参与者被问及一生在机构(卫生、社会和刑事司法机构)的经历。在组织和分析第一轮结构编码时,使用了世界卫生组织为解决心理健康不平等问题而改编的框架,随后进行了描述性编码和模式编码。第一个主题指出了机构干预的机会。参与者批评机构在社会政治议程(即感知风险、威胁或危机)的驱动下快速处理问题。因此,错过了进行有意义干预的机会。第二个主题确定了以家庭为导向的跨部门应对措施的范围。与会者描述了以个人而非家庭为重点的短期社会干预措施和体制结构,强调有必要将跨部门范围扩大到针对家庭的结构性干预措施。讨论研究结果突出表明,体制性应对措施的重点是组织驱动因素和下游问题,未能解决维持土著人面临精神病风险和不良后果的家庭社会环境结构问题。要实现公平,就必须建立一个跨部门的社会责任共享框架,针对结构性因素来满足土著家庭的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Institutional pathways to psychosis for Indigenous Māori: A qualitative exploration of experiences

Background

Inequities in the incidence and outcomes of first episode psychosis (FEP) for Indigenous peoples are impacted by multiple institutional systems. This study examines Indigenous experiences of these systems to gain an understanding of how to improve institutional responses to FEP inequity.

Methods

Critical race theory informed the methods used. Twenty-three participants participated in four focus group interviews, and thirteen individual interviews, including nine Māori youth and young adults with FEP, ten family members, and four Māori health professionals. Participants were asked about lifetime experiences of institutions (health, social, and criminal-justice). An adapted WHO framework for addressing mental health inequities was used to organize and analyse the first round of structural coding, followed by descriptive and pattern coding.

Results

Two themes were identified. The first theme signposted opportunities for institutional intervention. Participants critique being processed quickly through institutions that are driven by socio-political agendas, namely perceived risk, threat or crisis. Subsequently, opportunities for meaningful intervention were missed. The second theme identified scope for family orientated responses across sectors. Participants described short-term social interventions and institutional structures that focused on individuals rather than families, emphasizing the need to broaden cross-sector scope to structural interventions for families.

Discussion

The findings highlight institutional responses are focused on organisational drivers and downstream issues, that fail to address the fabric of the family social-environmental conditions that maintain Indigenous exposure to psychosis risk and poor outcomes. A pathway to equity would require a shared framework of social responsibility across sectors, that targets structural factors responsive to Indigenous family needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信