南印度非酒精性脂肪肝患者队列中评估肝纤维化严重程度的无创评分系统验证研究

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Joe F. Mathew , Charles Panackel , Mathew Jacob , Ganesh Ramesh , Nita John
{"title":"南印度非酒精性脂肪肝患者队列中评估肝纤维化严重程度的无创评分系统验证研究","authors":"Joe F. Mathew ,&nbsp;Charles Panackel ,&nbsp;Mathew Jacob ,&nbsp;Ganesh Ramesh ,&nbsp;Nita John","doi":"10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Liver biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing and staging non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), but liver biopsy has its limitations. Non-invasive tests (NITs) eliminate many of the drawbacks of liver biopsy. We did a retrospective observational study to validate the NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS score) and Fibrosis Score 4 (FIB-4 index) against the gold standard liver biopsy in a cohort of South Indian patients with NAFLD.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The aim of this study was to validate the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive fibrosis scoring systems (FIB-4 index and NFS), compared to that of liver histology, to predict AF in a cohort of south Indian patients with NAFLD.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A retrospective observational analytical study of patients who had a liver biopsy with a diagnosis of NAFLD and had all the data for aetiology assessment and NIT calculation within 4 weeks of biopsy were included in the study. On liver biopsy, NAFLD was scored as per NIH's NASH committee grading system. NFS and FIB-4 index were calculated, and scores more than 0.676 and 2.67, respectively, were taken as the cut-off to predict advanced fibrosis (AF). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for NFS score and FIB-4 score to diagnose AF were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 147 patients were included in the study. Of these, 56 (38.1%) patients had AF (Stage 3, 4). Patients with AF were more likely to be older and have diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients with AF had lower platelet count, higher aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lower albumin, and higher AST/alanine aminotransferase ratio. An NFS of &gt;0.676 had a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 100%, and an FIB-4 index of &gt;2.67 had a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 95.6 % in diagnosing AF in our study.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The non-invasive scoring systems NFS and FIB-4 index can be used as a bedside tool for diagnosing liver fibrosis in NAFLD allowing liver biopsy to be used in a more targeted manner for patients diagnosed with AF on NITs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15479,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","volume":"14 5","pages":"Article 101407"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Validation Study of Non-invasive Scoring Systems for Assessing Severity of Hepatic Fibrosis in a Cohort of South Indian Patients With Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease\",\"authors\":\"Joe F. Mathew ,&nbsp;Charles Panackel ,&nbsp;Mathew Jacob ,&nbsp;Ganesh Ramesh ,&nbsp;Nita John\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Liver biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing and staging non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), but liver biopsy has its limitations. Non-invasive tests (NITs) eliminate many of the drawbacks of liver biopsy. We did a retrospective observational study to validate the NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS score) and Fibrosis Score 4 (FIB-4 index) against the gold standard liver biopsy in a cohort of South Indian patients with NAFLD.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The aim of this study was to validate the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive fibrosis scoring systems (FIB-4 index and NFS), compared to that of liver histology, to predict AF in a cohort of south Indian patients with NAFLD.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A retrospective observational analytical study of patients who had a liver biopsy with a diagnosis of NAFLD and had all the data for aetiology assessment and NIT calculation within 4 weeks of biopsy were included in the study. On liver biopsy, NAFLD was scored as per NIH's NASH committee grading system. NFS and FIB-4 index were calculated, and scores more than 0.676 and 2.67, respectively, were taken as the cut-off to predict advanced fibrosis (AF). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for NFS score and FIB-4 score to diagnose AF were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 147 patients were included in the study. Of these, 56 (38.1%) patients had AF (Stage 3, 4). Patients with AF were more likely to be older and have diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients with AF had lower platelet count, higher aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lower albumin, and higher AST/alanine aminotransferase ratio. An NFS of &gt;0.676 had a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 100%, and an FIB-4 index of &gt;2.67 had a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 95.6 % in diagnosing AF in our study.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The non-invasive scoring systems NFS and FIB-4 index can be used as a bedside tool for diagnosing liver fibrosis in NAFLD allowing liver biopsy to be used in a more targeted manner for patients diagnosed with AF on NITs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology\",\"volume\":\"14 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101407\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973688324000641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973688324000641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:肝活检是诊断和分期非酒精性脂肪肝(NAFLD)的金标准,但肝活检也有其局限性。无创检验(NIT)消除了肝活检的许多缺点。我们进行了一项回顾性观察研究,在南印度非酒精性脂肪肝患者队列中验证了非酒精性脂肪肝纤维化评分(NFS 评分)和纤维化评分 4(FIB-4 指数)与金标准肝活检的比较。材料和方法本研究对进行肝活检并诊断为非酒精性脂肪肝的患者进行回顾性观察分析,这些患者在活检后 4 周内拥有病因评估和 NIT 计算所需的所有数据。肝活检时,非酒精性脂肪肝按照美国国立卫生研究院 NASH 委员会的分级系统进行评分。计算NFS和FIB-4指数,分别以大于0.676和2.67作为预测晚期纤维化(AF)的临界值。计算了 NFS 评分和 FIB-4 评分诊断 AF 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和接收者操作特征曲线下面积。其中,56 例(38.1%)患者患有房颤(第 3、4 期)。心房颤动患者更可能是老年人和糖尿病患者(DM)。房颤患者的血小板计数较低,天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)较高,白蛋白较低,AST/丙氨酸氨基转移酶比率较高。在我们的研究中,NFS 为 0.676 时,诊断 AF 的灵敏度为 68%,特异度为 100%;FIB-4 指数为 2.67 时,诊断 AF 的灵敏度为 67%,特异度为 95.6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Validation Study of Non-invasive Scoring Systems for Assessing Severity of Hepatic Fibrosis in a Cohort of South Indian Patients With Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Introduction

Liver biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing and staging non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), but liver biopsy has its limitations. Non-invasive tests (NITs) eliminate many of the drawbacks of liver biopsy. We did a retrospective observational study to validate the NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS score) and Fibrosis Score 4 (FIB-4 index) against the gold standard liver biopsy in a cohort of South Indian patients with NAFLD.

Aims

The aim of this study was to validate the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive fibrosis scoring systems (FIB-4 index and NFS), compared to that of liver histology, to predict AF in a cohort of south Indian patients with NAFLD.

Material and methods

A retrospective observational analytical study of patients who had a liver biopsy with a diagnosis of NAFLD and had all the data for aetiology assessment and NIT calculation within 4 weeks of biopsy were included in the study. On liver biopsy, NAFLD was scored as per NIH's NASH committee grading system. NFS and FIB-4 index were calculated, and scores more than 0.676 and 2.67, respectively, were taken as the cut-off to predict advanced fibrosis (AF). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for NFS score and FIB-4 score to diagnose AF were calculated.

Results

A total of 147 patients were included in the study. Of these, 56 (38.1%) patients had AF (Stage 3, 4). Patients with AF were more likely to be older and have diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients with AF had lower platelet count, higher aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lower albumin, and higher AST/alanine aminotransferase ratio. An NFS of >0.676 had a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 100%, and an FIB-4 index of >2.67 had a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 95.6 % in diagnosing AF in our study.

Conclusion

The non-invasive scoring systems NFS and FIB-4 index can be used as a bedside tool for diagnosing liver fibrosis in NAFLD allowing liver biopsy to be used in a more targeted manner for patients diagnosed with AF on NITs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信