Samuel Jiménez Gil , Manuel I. Capel , Gabriel Olea Olea
{"title":"根据正式合同自动生成测试用例","authors":"Samuel Jiménez Gil , Manuel I. Capel , Gabriel Olea Olea","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context:</h3><p>Software verification for critical systems is facing an unprecedented cost increase due to the large amount of software packed in multicore platforms generally. A substantial amount of the verification efforts are dedicated to testing. Spark/Ada is a language often employed in safety-critical systems due to its high reliability. Formal contracts are often inserted in Spark’s program specification to be used by a static theorem prover that checks whether the specification conforms with the implementation. However, this static analysis has its limitations as certain bugs can only be spotted through software testing.</p></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><p>The main goal of our work is to use these formal contracts in Spark as input for a test oracle – whose method we describe – to generate test cases. Subsequent objectives consist of a) arguing about the traceability to comply with safety-critical software standards such as DO-178C for civil avionics and b) embracing the best-established software testing methods for these systems.</p></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><p>Our test generation method reads Spark formal contracts and applies Equivalence Class Partitioning with Boundary Analysis as a software testing method generating traceable test cases.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>The evaluation, which uses an array of open-source examples of Spark contracts, shows a high level of passed test cases and statement coverage. The results are also compared against a random test generator.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>The proposed method is very effective at achieving a high number of passed test cases and coverage. We make the case that the effort to create formal specifications for Spark can be used both for proof and (automatic) testing. Lastly, we noticed that some formal contracts are more suitable than others for our test generation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 107467"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924000727/pdfft?md5=80c3283544002febbccadca1ed428ad0&pid=1-s2.0-S0950584924000727-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic test cases generation from formal contracts\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Jiménez Gil , Manuel I. Capel , Gabriel Olea Olea\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context:</h3><p>Software verification for critical systems is facing an unprecedented cost increase due to the large amount of software packed in multicore platforms generally. A substantial amount of the verification efforts are dedicated to testing. Spark/Ada is a language often employed in safety-critical systems due to its high reliability. Formal contracts are often inserted in Spark’s program specification to be used by a static theorem prover that checks whether the specification conforms with the implementation. However, this static analysis has its limitations as certain bugs can only be spotted through software testing.</p></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><p>The main goal of our work is to use these formal contracts in Spark as input for a test oracle – whose method we describe – to generate test cases. Subsequent objectives consist of a) arguing about the traceability to comply with safety-critical software standards such as DO-178C for civil avionics and b) embracing the best-established software testing methods for these systems.</p></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><p>Our test generation method reads Spark formal contracts and applies Equivalence Class Partitioning with Boundary Analysis as a software testing method generating traceable test cases.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>The evaluation, which uses an array of open-source examples of Spark contracts, shows a high level of passed test cases and statement coverage. The results are also compared against a random test generator.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>The proposed method is very effective at achieving a high number of passed test cases and coverage. We make the case that the effort to create formal specifications for Spark can be used both for proof and (automatic) testing. Lastly, we noticed that some formal contracts are more suitable than others for our test generation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Software Technology\",\"volume\":\"172 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924000727/pdfft?md5=80c3283544002febbccadca1ed428ad0&pid=1-s2.0-S0950584924000727-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Software Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924000727\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924000727","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Automatic test cases generation from formal contracts
Context:
Software verification for critical systems is facing an unprecedented cost increase due to the large amount of software packed in multicore platforms generally. A substantial amount of the verification efforts are dedicated to testing. Spark/Ada is a language often employed in safety-critical systems due to its high reliability. Formal contracts are often inserted in Spark’s program specification to be used by a static theorem prover that checks whether the specification conforms with the implementation. However, this static analysis has its limitations as certain bugs can only be spotted through software testing.
Objective:
The main goal of our work is to use these formal contracts in Spark as input for a test oracle – whose method we describe – to generate test cases. Subsequent objectives consist of a) arguing about the traceability to comply with safety-critical software standards such as DO-178C for civil avionics and b) embracing the best-established software testing methods for these systems.
Method:
Our test generation method reads Spark formal contracts and applies Equivalence Class Partitioning with Boundary Analysis as a software testing method generating traceable test cases.
Results:
The evaluation, which uses an array of open-source examples of Spark contracts, shows a high level of passed test cases and statement coverage. The results are also compared against a random test generator.
Conclusion:
The proposed method is very effective at achieving a high number of passed test cases and coverage. We make the case that the effort to create formal specifications for Spark can be used both for proof and (automatic) testing. Lastly, we noticed that some formal contracts are more suitable than others for our test generation.
期刊介绍:
Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include:
• Software management, quality and metrics,
• Software processes,
• Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming
• Functional and non-functional software requirements
• Software testing and verification & validation
• Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development
Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information.
The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.