根据正式合同自动生成测试用例

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Samuel Jiménez Gil , Manuel I. Capel , Gabriel Olea Olea
{"title":"根据正式合同自动生成测试用例","authors":"Samuel Jiménez Gil ,&nbsp;Manuel I. Capel ,&nbsp;Gabriel Olea Olea","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context:</h3><p>Software verification for critical systems is facing an unprecedented cost increase due to the large amount of software packed in multicore platforms generally. A substantial amount of the verification efforts are dedicated to testing. Spark/Ada is a language often employed in safety-critical systems due to its high reliability. Formal contracts are often inserted in Spark’s program specification to be used by a static theorem prover that checks whether the specification conforms with the implementation. However, this static analysis has its limitations as certain bugs can only be spotted through software testing.</p></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><p>The main goal of our work is to use these formal contracts in Spark as input for a test oracle – whose method we describe – to generate test cases. Subsequent objectives consist of a) arguing about the traceability to comply with safety-critical software standards such as DO-178C for civil avionics and b) embracing the best-established software testing methods for these systems.</p></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><p>Our test generation method reads Spark formal contracts and applies Equivalence Class Partitioning with Boundary Analysis as a software testing method generating traceable test cases.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>The evaluation, which uses an array of open-source examples of Spark contracts, shows a high level of passed test cases and statement coverage. The results are also compared against a random test generator.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>The proposed method is very effective at achieving a high number of passed test cases and coverage. We make the case that the effort to create formal specifications for Spark can be used both for proof and (automatic) testing. Lastly, we noticed that some formal contracts are more suitable than others for our test generation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 107467"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924000727/pdfft?md5=80c3283544002febbccadca1ed428ad0&pid=1-s2.0-S0950584924000727-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic test cases generation from formal contracts\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Jiménez Gil ,&nbsp;Manuel I. Capel ,&nbsp;Gabriel Olea Olea\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context:</h3><p>Software verification for critical systems is facing an unprecedented cost increase due to the large amount of software packed in multicore platforms generally. A substantial amount of the verification efforts are dedicated to testing. Spark/Ada is a language often employed in safety-critical systems due to its high reliability. Formal contracts are often inserted in Spark’s program specification to be used by a static theorem prover that checks whether the specification conforms with the implementation. However, this static analysis has its limitations as certain bugs can only be spotted through software testing.</p></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><p>The main goal of our work is to use these formal contracts in Spark as input for a test oracle – whose method we describe – to generate test cases. Subsequent objectives consist of a) arguing about the traceability to comply with safety-critical software standards such as DO-178C for civil avionics and b) embracing the best-established software testing methods for these systems.</p></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><p>Our test generation method reads Spark formal contracts and applies Equivalence Class Partitioning with Boundary Analysis as a software testing method generating traceable test cases.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>The evaluation, which uses an array of open-source examples of Spark contracts, shows a high level of passed test cases and statement coverage. The results are also compared against a random test generator.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>The proposed method is very effective at achieving a high number of passed test cases and coverage. We make the case that the effort to create formal specifications for Spark can be used both for proof and (automatic) testing. Lastly, we noticed that some formal contracts are more suitable than others for our test generation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Software Technology\",\"volume\":\"172 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924000727/pdfft?md5=80c3283544002febbccadca1ed428ad0&pid=1-s2.0-S0950584924000727-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Software Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924000727\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924000727","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于多核平台中普遍存在大量软件,关键系统的软件验证成本正面临前所未有的增长。大量的验证工作专门用于测试。Spark/Ada 因其高可靠性而成为安全关键型系统中经常使用的语言。在 Spark 的程序规范中通常会插入形式契约,以便由静态定理检验器检查规范是否与实现相符。目标:我们工作的主要目标是将 Spark 中的这些形式化合约作为测试甲骨文的输入(我们将介绍其方法),以生成测试用例。方法:我们的测试生成方法读取 Spark 形式化合约,并将等价类划分与边界分析作为软件测试方法来生成可跟踪的测试用例。结果:评估使用了一系列 Spark 合约的开源示例,显示了高水平的通过测试用例和语句覆盖率。结论:所提出的方法在实现高通过测试用例数和覆盖率方面非常有效。我们认为,为 Spark 创建正式规范的努力既可用于证明,也可用于(自动)测试。最后,我们注意到某些形式化合约比其他合约更适合我们的测试生成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automatic test cases generation from formal contracts

Context:

Software verification for critical systems is facing an unprecedented cost increase due to the large amount of software packed in multicore platforms generally. A substantial amount of the verification efforts are dedicated to testing. Spark/Ada is a language often employed in safety-critical systems due to its high reliability. Formal contracts are often inserted in Spark’s program specification to be used by a static theorem prover that checks whether the specification conforms with the implementation. However, this static analysis has its limitations as certain bugs can only be spotted through software testing.

Objective:

The main goal of our work is to use these formal contracts in Spark as input for a test oracle – whose method we describe – to generate test cases. Subsequent objectives consist of a) arguing about the traceability to comply with safety-critical software standards such as DO-178C for civil avionics and b) embracing the best-established software testing methods for these systems.

Method:

Our test generation method reads Spark formal contracts and applies Equivalence Class Partitioning with Boundary Analysis as a software testing method generating traceable test cases.

Results:

The evaluation, which uses an array of open-source examples of Spark contracts, shows a high level of passed test cases and statement coverage. The results are also compared against a random test generator.

Conclusion:

The proposed method is very effective at achieving a high number of passed test cases and coverage. We make the case that the effort to create formal specifications for Spark can be used both for proof and (automatic) testing. Lastly, we noticed that some formal contracts are more suitable than others for our test generation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information and Software Technology
Information and Software Technology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
9.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include: • Software management, quality and metrics, • Software processes, • Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming • Functional and non-functional software requirements • Software testing and verification & validation • Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information. The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信