Mareike Schwab , Maria Brockmann , Petra Stumpf , Johannes Pfabe , Elisabeth Müller , Michael Pees , Rachel E. Marschang
{"title":"从兔子的脓肿和伤口中分离需氧细菌,并对分离出的葡萄球菌属和假单胞菌属进行抗生素敏感性测试","authors":"Mareike Schwab , Maria Brockmann , Petra Stumpf , Johannes Pfabe , Elisabeth Müller , Michael Pees , Rachel E. Marschang","doi":"10.1053/j.jepm.2024.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Wound infections and abscesses in rabbits are a common problem in veterinary practice and their treatment can be challenging. Bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing are important tools in these cases. While some studies are available on bacteria associated with wound infections and abscesses in rabbits, the numbers of animals included is generally limited. Monitoring of antibiotic resistance in clinical practice is also an important part of good antibiotic stewardship. Multiple antibiotic resistances are frequently encountered in <em>Staphylococcus</em> and <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp., 2 groups of bacteria commonly associated with abscesses in rabbits.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study evaluated the results of aerobic bacterial cultures and antibiotic susceptibility tests in swabs from abscesses (A) (n = 541) and from skin and wounds (SW) (n = 308) submitted to a commercial diagnostic laboratory. Samples submitted between January 2017 and October 2020 were included in the study. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for <em>Staphylococcus</em> and <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. was evaluated and compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In A, 465 bacterial isolates including 35 different species were isolated while 394 bacterial isolates, including 35 different species, were found in SW. The most frequently isolated bacteria were <em>Staphylococcus</em> spp. (A = 21.7%, SW = 36.5%) followed by <em>Pasteurella</em> spp. in A (13.3%) and aerobic spore-forming bacteria in SW (11.2%). <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. was the third most commonly isolated genus in both sample types (A = 11.6%, SW = 8.9%). <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> isolated from A were more often resistant to the tested antibiotics than other <em>Pseudomonas</em> species. These results support the need for bacterial culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing in small mammal practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15801,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine","volume":"49 ","pages":"Pages 41-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isolation of aerobic bacteria from abscesses and wounds in rabbits and antibiotic susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. isolates\",\"authors\":\"Mareike Schwab , Maria Brockmann , Petra Stumpf , Johannes Pfabe , Elisabeth Müller , Michael Pees , Rachel E. Marschang\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jepm.2024.03.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Wound infections and abscesses in rabbits are a common problem in veterinary practice and their treatment can be challenging. Bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing are important tools in these cases. While some studies are available on bacteria associated with wound infections and abscesses in rabbits, the numbers of animals included is generally limited. Monitoring of antibiotic resistance in clinical practice is also an important part of good antibiotic stewardship. Multiple antibiotic resistances are frequently encountered in <em>Staphylococcus</em> and <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp., 2 groups of bacteria commonly associated with abscesses in rabbits.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study evaluated the results of aerobic bacterial cultures and antibiotic susceptibility tests in swabs from abscesses (A) (n = 541) and from skin and wounds (SW) (n = 308) submitted to a commercial diagnostic laboratory. Samples submitted between January 2017 and October 2020 were included in the study. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for <em>Staphylococcus</em> and <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. was evaluated and compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In A, 465 bacterial isolates including 35 different species were isolated while 394 bacterial isolates, including 35 different species, were found in SW. The most frequently isolated bacteria were <em>Staphylococcus</em> spp. (A = 21.7%, SW = 36.5%) followed by <em>Pasteurella</em> spp. in A (13.3%) and aerobic spore-forming bacteria in SW (11.2%). <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. was the third most commonly isolated genus in both sample types (A = 11.6%, SW = 8.9%). <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> isolated from A were more often resistant to the tested antibiotics than other <em>Pseudomonas</em> species. These results support the need for bacterial culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing in small mammal practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 41-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557506324000399\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557506324000399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Isolation of aerobic bacteria from abscesses and wounds in rabbits and antibiotic susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. isolates
Background
Wound infections and abscesses in rabbits are a common problem in veterinary practice and their treatment can be challenging. Bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing are important tools in these cases. While some studies are available on bacteria associated with wound infections and abscesses in rabbits, the numbers of animals included is generally limited. Monitoring of antibiotic resistance in clinical practice is also an important part of good antibiotic stewardship. Multiple antibiotic resistances are frequently encountered in Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas spp., 2 groups of bacteria commonly associated with abscesses in rabbits.
Methods
This retrospective study evaluated the results of aerobic bacterial cultures and antibiotic susceptibility tests in swabs from abscesses (A) (n = 541) and from skin and wounds (SW) (n = 308) submitted to a commercial diagnostic laboratory. Samples submitted between January 2017 and October 2020 were included in the study. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas spp. was evaluated and compared.
Results
In A, 465 bacterial isolates including 35 different species were isolated while 394 bacterial isolates, including 35 different species, were found in SW. The most frequently isolated bacteria were Staphylococcus spp. (A = 21.7%, SW = 36.5%) followed by Pasteurella spp. in A (13.3%) and aerobic spore-forming bacteria in SW (11.2%). Pseudomonas spp. was the third most commonly isolated genus in both sample types (A = 11.6%, SW = 8.9%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from A were more often resistant to the tested antibiotics than other Pseudomonas species. These results support the need for bacterial culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing in small mammal practice.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine provides clinicians with a convenient, comprehensive, "must have" resource to enhance and elevate their expertise with exotic pet medicine. Each issue contains wide ranging peer-reviewed articles that cover many of the current and novel topics important to clinicians caring for exotic pets. Diagnostic challenges, consensus articles and selected review articles are also included to help keep veterinarians up to date on issues affecting their practice. In addition, the Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine serves as the official publication of both the Association of Exotic Mammal Veterinarians (AEMV) and the European Association of Avian Veterinarians (EAAV). The Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine is the most complete resource for practitioners who treat exotic pets.