利用化石记录检验深海冰川扰动假说是否是造成挪威海现今多样性低以及由此导致的纬度多样性陡峭梯度的原因之一

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Anna B. Jöst, Huai-Hsuan M. Huang, Yuanyuan Hong, Chih-Lin Wei, Henning A. Bauch, Benoit Thibodeau, Thomas M. Cronin, Hisayo Okahashi, Moriaki Yasuhara
{"title":"利用化石记录检验深海冰川扰动假说是否是造成挪威海现今多样性低以及由此导致的纬度多样性陡峭梯度的原因之一","authors":"Anna B. Jöst,&nbsp;Huai-Hsuan M. Huang,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Hong,&nbsp;Chih-Lin Wei,&nbsp;Henning A. Bauch,&nbsp;Benoit Thibodeau,&nbsp;Thomas M. Cronin,&nbsp;Hisayo Okahashi,&nbsp;Moriaki Yasuhara","doi":"10.1111/geb.13844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Within the intensively-studied, well-documented latitudinal diversity gradient, the deep-sea biodiversity of the present-day Norwegian Sea stands out with its notably low diversity, constituting a steep latitudinal diversity gradient in the North Atlantic. The reason behind this has long been a topic of debate and speculation. Most prominently, it is explained by the deep-sea glacial disturbance hypothesis, which states that harsh environmental glacial conditions negatively impacted Norwegian Sea diversities, which have not yet fully recovered. Our aim is to empirically test this hypothesis. Specific research questions are: (1) Has deep-sea biodiversity been lower during glacials than during interglacials? <i>(</i>2) Was there any faunal shift at the Mid-Brunhes Event (MBE) when the mode of glacial–interglacial climatic change was altered?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Norwegian Sea, deep sea (1819–2800 m), coring sites MD992277, PS1243, and M23352.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time period</h3>\n \n <p>620.7–1.4 ka (Middle Pleistocene–Late Holocene).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Taxa studied</h3>\n \n <p>Ostracoda (Crustacea).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We empirically test the deep-sea glacial disturbance hypothesis by investigating whether diversity in glacial periods is consistently lower than diversity in interglacial periods. Additionally, we apply comparative analyses to determine a potential faunal shift at the MBE, a Pleistocene event describing a fundamental shift in global climate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The deep Norwegian Sea diversity was not lower during glacial periods compared to interglacial periods. Holocene diversity was exceedingly lower than that of the last glacial period. Faunal composition changed substantially between pre- and post-MBE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These results reject the glacial disturbance hypothesis, since the low glacial diversity is the important precondition here. The present-day-style deep Norwegian Sea ecosystem was established by the MBE, more specifically by MBE-induced changes in global climate, which has led to more dynamic post-MBE conditions. In a broader context, this implies that the MBE has played an important role in the establishment of the modern polar deep-sea ecosystem and biodiversity in general.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"33 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.13844","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the deep-sea glacial disturbance hypothesis as a cause of low, present-day Norwegian Sea diversity and resulting steep latitudinal diversity gradient, using fossil records\",\"authors\":\"Anna B. Jöst,&nbsp;Huai-Hsuan M. Huang,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Hong,&nbsp;Chih-Lin Wei,&nbsp;Henning A. Bauch,&nbsp;Benoit Thibodeau,&nbsp;Thomas M. Cronin,&nbsp;Hisayo Okahashi,&nbsp;Moriaki Yasuhara\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.13844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Within the intensively-studied, well-documented latitudinal diversity gradient, the deep-sea biodiversity of the present-day Norwegian Sea stands out with its notably low diversity, constituting a steep latitudinal diversity gradient in the North Atlantic. The reason behind this has long been a topic of debate and speculation. Most prominently, it is explained by the deep-sea glacial disturbance hypothesis, which states that harsh environmental glacial conditions negatively impacted Norwegian Sea diversities, which have not yet fully recovered. Our aim is to empirically test this hypothesis. Specific research questions are: (1) Has deep-sea biodiversity been lower during glacials than during interglacials? <i>(</i>2) Was there any faunal shift at the Mid-Brunhes Event (MBE) when the mode of glacial–interglacial climatic change was altered?</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Norwegian Sea, deep sea (1819–2800 m), coring sites MD992277, PS1243, and M23352.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time period</h3>\\n \\n <p>620.7–1.4 ka (Middle Pleistocene–Late Holocene).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Taxa studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ostracoda (Crustacea).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We empirically test the deep-sea glacial disturbance hypothesis by investigating whether diversity in glacial periods is consistently lower than diversity in interglacial periods. Additionally, we apply comparative analyses to determine a potential faunal shift at the MBE, a Pleistocene event describing a fundamental shift in global climate.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The deep Norwegian Sea diversity was not lower during glacial periods compared to interglacial periods. Holocene diversity was exceedingly lower than that of the last glacial period. Faunal composition changed substantially between pre- and post-MBE.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>These results reject the glacial disturbance hypothesis, since the low glacial diversity is the important precondition here. The present-day-style deep Norwegian Sea ecosystem was established by the MBE, more specifically by MBE-induced changes in global climate, which has led to more dynamic post-MBE conditions. In a broader context, this implies that the MBE has played an important role in the establishment of the modern polar deep-sea ecosystem and biodiversity in general.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"33 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.13844\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13844\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13844","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在经过深入研究和充分记录的纬度多样性梯度中,当今挪威海的深海生物多样性以其明显的低多样性而脱颖而出,构成了北大西洋陡峭的纬度多样性梯度。这背后的原因一直是人们争论和猜测的话题。最主要的解释是 "深海冰川扰动假说"(the deep-sea glacial disturbance hypothesis),该假说认为严酷的冰川环境条件对挪威海的多样性产生了负面影响,而挪威海的多样性至今尚未完全恢复。我们的目标是对这一假说进行实证检验。具体的研究问题是(1) 冰川期的深海生物多样性是否低于间冰期?(2) 当冰川-间冰期气候变化模式发生改变时,在布伦瑞斯中期事件(MBE)中是否有任何动物群的变化?4 ka (Middle Pleistocene-Late Holocene).Taxa studiedOstracoda (Crustacea).Methods We empirically test the deep-sea glacial disturbance hypothesis by investigating whether diversity in glacial periods is consistently lower than diversity in interglacial periods.此外,我们还运用比较分析来确定 MBE(描述全球气候根本性转变的更新世事件)可能发生的动物群变化。结果挪威海深海的多样性在冰川期并不比间冰期低。全新世的多样性远远低于上一个冰川期。这些结果否定了冰川扰动假说,因为冰川期的低多样性是冰川期的重要前提条件。现今的挪威海深海生态系统是由 MBE(更具体地说,是由 MBE 引起的全球气候变化)建立起来的,这导致了 MBE 后更为动态的条件。从更广泛的角度看,这意味着 MBE 在建立现代极地深海生态系统和生物多样性方面发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Testing the deep-sea glacial disturbance hypothesis as a cause of low, present-day Norwegian Sea diversity and resulting steep latitudinal diversity gradient, using fossil records

Testing the deep-sea glacial disturbance hypothesis as a cause of low, present-day Norwegian Sea diversity and resulting steep latitudinal diversity gradient, using fossil records

Aim

Within the intensively-studied, well-documented latitudinal diversity gradient, the deep-sea biodiversity of the present-day Norwegian Sea stands out with its notably low diversity, constituting a steep latitudinal diversity gradient in the North Atlantic. The reason behind this has long been a topic of debate and speculation. Most prominently, it is explained by the deep-sea glacial disturbance hypothesis, which states that harsh environmental glacial conditions negatively impacted Norwegian Sea diversities, which have not yet fully recovered. Our aim is to empirically test this hypothesis. Specific research questions are: (1) Has deep-sea biodiversity been lower during glacials than during interglacials? (2) Was there any faunal shift at the Mid-Brunhes Event (MBE) when the mode of glacial–interglacial climatic change was altered?

Location

Norwegian Sea, deep sea (1819–2800 m), coring sites MD992277, PS1243, and M23352.

Time period

620.7–1.4 ka (Middle Pleistocene–Late Holocene).

Taxa studied

Ostracoda (Crustacea).

Methods

We empirically test the deep-sea glacial disturbance hypothesis by investigating whether diversity in glacial periods is consistently lower than diversity in interglacial periods. Additionally, we apply comparative analyses to determine a potential faunal shift at the MBE, a Pleistocene event describing a fundamental shift in global climate.

Results

The deep Norwegian Sea diversity was not lower during glacial periods compared to interglacial periods. Holocene diversity was exceedingly lower than that of the last glacial period. Faunal composition changed substantially between pre- and post-MBE.

Main conclusions

These results reject the glacial disturbance hypothesis, since the low glacial diversity is the important precondition here. The present-day-style deep Norwegian Sea ecosystem was established by the MBE, more specifically by MBE-induced changes in global climate, which has led to more dynamic post-MBE conditions. In a broader context, this implies that the MBE has played an important role in the establishment of the modern polar deep-sea ecosystem and biodiversity in general.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信