Michael Sievers, Rod M. Connolly, Kimberly A. Finlayson, Michaela E. Kitchingman, Andria Ostrowski, Ryan M. Pearson, Mischa P. Turschwell, Maria F. Adame, Ana B. Bugnot, Ellen Ditria, Robin Hale, Brian R. Silliman, Stephen E. Swearer, Stephanie R. Valdez, Christopher J. Brown
{"title":"海岸恢复带来的生物多样性成果得到了加强,但差异很大:全球综述","authors":"Michael Sievers, Rod M. Connolly, Kimberly A. Finlayson, Michaela E. Kitchingman, Andria Ostrowski, Ryan M. Pearson, Mischa P. Turschwell, Maria F. Adame, Ana B. Bugnot, Ellen Ditria, Robin Hale, Brian R. Silliman, Stephen E. Swearer, Stephanie R. Valdez, Christopher J. Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.oneear.2024.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coastal ecosystems are being restored to combat environmental degradation and biodiversity loss. Colonization of restored sites by non-habitat-forming animals improves outcomes for ecosystems and society, yet there has been no review of how animals respond to coastal restoration. Here, we extracted 5,133 response ratios from 160 studies to show how coastal ecosystem restoration benefits animals as individuals, populations, and communities. Abundances and diversity at restored sites were greater than at degraded (61% and 35%, respectively) and unstructured (42% and 37%) control sites and similar to those at natural reference sites (both within 2%). Individuals in restored sites were similar in condition to those within control and reference sites. However, responses among projects were highly variable and rarely related to restored site maturity or characteristics, presenting a challenge for predicting outcomes and highlighting the need to improve restoration techniques, monitoring, and reporting. Nevertheless, studies so far suggest coastal restoration benefits biodiversity.","PeriodicalId":52366,"journal":{"name":"One Earth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced but highly variable biodiversity outcomes from coastal restoration: A global synthesis\",\"authors\":\"Michael Sievers, Rod M. Connolly, Kimberly A. Finlayson, Michaela E. Kitchingman, Andria Ostrowski, Ryan M. Pearson, Mischa P. Turschwell, Maria F. Adame, Ana B. Bugnot, Ellen Ditria, Robin Hale, Brian R. Silliman, Stephen E. Swearer, Stephanie R. Valdez, Christopher J. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oneear.2024.02.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Coastal ecosystems are being restored to combat environmental degradation and biodiversity loss. Colonization of restored sites by non-habitat-forming animals improves outcomes for ecosystems and society, yet there has been no review of how animals respond to coastal restoration. Here, we extracted 5,133 response ratios from 160 studies to show how coastal ecosystem restoration benefits animals as individuals, populations, and communities. Abundances and diversity at restored sites were greater than at degraded (61% and 35%, respectively) and unstructured (42% and 37%) control sites and similar to those at natural reference sites (both within 2%). Individuals in restored sites were similar in condition to those within control and reference sites. However, responses among projects were highly variable and rarely related to restored site maturity or characteristics, presenting a challenge for predicting outcomes and highlighting the need to improve restoration techniques, monitoring, and reporting. Nevertheless, studies so far suggest coastal restoration benefits biodiversity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"One Earth\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"One Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.02.013\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Earth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.02.013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhanced but highly variable biodiversity outcomes from coastal restoration: A global synthesis
Coastal ecosystems are being restored to combat environmental degradation and biodiversity loss. Colonization of restored sites by non-habitat-forming animals improves outcomes for ecosystems and society, yet there has been no review of how animals respond to coastal restoration. Here, we extracted 5,133 response ratios from 160 studies to show how coastal ecosystem restoration benefits animals as individuals, populations, and communities. Abundances and diversity at restored sites were greater than at degraded (61% and 35%, respectively) and unstructured (42% and 37%) control sites and similar to those at natural reference sites (both within 2%). Individuals in restored sites were similar in condition to those within control and reference sites. However, responses among projects were highly variable and rarely related to restored site maturity or characteristics, presenting a challenge for predicting outcomes and highlighting the need to improve restoration techniques, monitoring, and reporting. Nevertheless, studies so far suggest coastal restoration benefits biodiversity.
One EarthEnvironmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
159
期刊介绍:
One Earth, Cell Press' flagship sustainability journal, serves as a platform for high-quality research and perspectives that contribute to a deeper understanding and resolution of contemporary sustainability challenges. With monthly thematic issues, the journal aims to bridge gaps between natural, social, and applied sciences, along with the humanities. One Earth fosters the cross-pollination of ideas, inspiring transformative research to address the complexities of sustainability.