海岸恢复带来的生物多样性成果得到了加强,但差异很大:全球综述

IF 15.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Michael Sievers, Rod M. Connolly, Kimberly A. Finlayson, Michaela E. Kitchingman, Andria Ostrowski, Ryan M. Pearson, Mischa P. Turschwell, Maria F. Adame, Ana B. Bugnot, Ellen Ditria, Robin Hale, Brian R. Silliman, Stephen E. Swearer, Stephanie R. Valdez, Christopher J. Brown
{"title":"海岸恢复带来的生物多样性成果得到了加强,但差异很大:全球综述","authors":"Michael Sievers, Rod M. Connolly, Kimberly A. Finlayson, Michaela E. Kitchingman, Andria Ostrowski, Ryan M. Pearson, Mischa P. Turschwell, Maria F. Adame, Ana B. Bugnot, Ellen Ditria, Robin Hale, Brian R. Silliman, Stephen E. Swearer, Stephanie R. Valdez, Christopher J. Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.oneear.2024.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coastal ecosystems are being restored to combat environmental degradation and biodiversity loss. Colonization of restored sites by non-habitat-forming animals improves outcomes for ecosystems and society, yet there has been no review of how animals respond to coastal restoration. Here, we extracted 5,133 response ratios from 160 studies to show how coastal ecosystem restoration benefits animals as individuals, populations, and communities. Abundances and diversity at restored sites were greater than at degraded (61% and 35%, respectively) and unstructured (42% and 37%) control sites and similar to those at natural reference sites (both within 2%). Individuals in restored sites were similar in condition to those within control and reference sites. However, responses among projects were highly variable and rarely related to restored site maturity or characteristics, presenting a challenge for predicting outcomes and highlighting the need to improve restoration techniques, monitoring, and reporting. Nevertheless, studies so far suggest coastal restoration benefits biodiversity.","PeriodicalId":52366,"journal":{"name":"One Earth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced but highly variable biodiversity outcomes from coastal restoration: A global synthesis\",\"authors\":\"Michael Sievers, Rod M. Connolly, Kimberly A. Finlayson, Michaela E. Kitchingman, Andria Ostrowski, Ryan M. Pearson, Mischa P. Turschwell, Maria F. Adame, Ana B. Bugnot, Ellen Ditria, Robin Hale, Brian R. Silliman, Stephen E. Swearer, Stephanie R. Valdez, Christopher J. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oneear.2024.02.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Coastal ecosystems are being restored to combat environmental degradation and biodiversity loss. Colonization of restored sites by non-habitat-forming animals improves outcomes for ecosystems and society, yet there has been no review of how animals respond to coastal restoration. Here, we extracted 5,133 response ratios from 160 studies to show how coastal ecosystem restoration benefits animals as individuals, populations, and communities. Abundances and diversity at restored sites were greater than at degraded (61% and 35%, respectively) and unstructured (42% and 37%) control sites and similar to those at natural reference sites (both within 2%). Individuals in restored sites were similar in condition to those within control and reference sites. However, responses among projects were highly variable and rarely related to restored site maturity or characteristics, presenting a challenge for predicting outcomes and highlighting the need to improve restoration techniques, monitoring, and reporting. Nevertheless, studies so far suggest coastal restoration benefits biodiversity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"One Earth\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"One Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.02.013\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Earth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.02.013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了应对环境退化和生物多样性丧失,人们正在恢复沿海生态系统。非栖息地动物在恢复地点的定殖改善了生态系统和社会的结果,但目前还没有关于动物如何对海岸恢复做出反应的综述。在此,我们从 160 项研究中提取了 5,133 个响应比率,以说明海岸生态系统恢复如何使动物个体、种群和群落受益。恢复地点的丰度和多样性高于退化(分别为 61% 和 35%)和非结构化(分别为 42% 和 37%)对照地点,与自然参照地点的丰度和多样性相似(均在 2% 以内)。恢复地点的个体状况与对照地点和参考地点的个体状况相似。然而,各项目之间的反应差异很大,而且很少与恢复地点的成熟度或特征有关,这对预测结果提出了挑战,并突出了改进恢复技术、监测和报告的必要性。不过,迄今为止的研究表明,海岸恢复有利于生物多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhanced but highly variable biodiversity outcomes from coastal restoration: A global synthesis
Coastal ecosystems are being restored to combat environmental degradation and biodiversity loss. Colonization of restored sites by non-habitat-forming animals improves outcomes for ecosystems and society, yet there has been no review of how animals respond to coastal restoration. Here, we extracted 5,133 response ratios from 160 studies to show how coastal ecosystem restoration benefits animals as individuals, populations, and communities. Abundances and diversity at restored sites were greater than at degraded (61% and 35%, respectively) and unstructured (42% and 37%) control sites and similar to those at natural reference sites (both within 2%). Individuals in restored sites were similar in condition to those within control and reference sites. However, responses among projects were highly variable and rarely related to restored site maturity or characteristics, presenting a challenge for predicting outcomes and highlighting the need to improve restoration techniques, monitoring, and reporting. Nevertheless, studies so far suggest coastal restoration benefits biodiversity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
One Earth
One Earth Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: One Earth, Cell Press' flagship sustainability journal, serves as a platform for high-quality research and perspectives that contribute to a deeper understanding and resolution of contemporary sustainability challenges. With monthly thematic issues, the journal aims to bridge gaps between natural, social, and applied sciences, along with the humanities. One Earth fosters the cross-pollination of ideas, inspiring transformative research to address the complexities of sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信