碳捕获:储存与利用

IF 5.5 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS
Michel Moreaux , Jean-Pierre Amigues , Gerard van der Meijden , Cees Withagen
{"title":"碳捕获:储存与利用","authors":"Michel Moreaux ,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre Amigues ,&nbsp;Gerard van der Meijden ,&nbsp;Cees Withagen","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2024.102976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Carbon capture and storage in salt domes or in inactive fields is seen as an appealing option to meet the ambitious objectives of the Paris Agreement. Captured CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions can also be injected in active fields to enhance gas or oil recovery. We examine the optimal scale and timing of these different capturing and storage options in a dynamic model of an economy subject to a carbon budget. We consider the socially optimal outcome as well as the outcome under <em>laissez-faire</em>. The social optimum can have different forms depending on the initial carbon budget, the fossil fuel resource stock and the stock of already injected CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> in active fields. The level and convexity of the costs of capturing, storing and producing renewable energy plays a role as well. We specify the conditions under which each possible sequence of regimes – no capturing, only enhanced recovery, only storage without enhanced recovery, a combination of both or only renewables – occurs. We quantify our analytical results by calibrating the model and running simulations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 102976"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069624000500/pdfft?md5=9c7b28db25f57931448332d680db5e88&pid=1-s2.0-S0095069624000500-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon capture: Storage vs. Utilization\",\"authors\":\"Michel Moreaux ,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre Amigues ,&nbsp;Gerard van der Meijden ,&nbsp;Cees Withagen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeem.2024.102976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Carbon capture and storage in salt domes or in inactive fields is seen as an appealing option to meet the ambitious objectives of the Paris Agreement. Captured CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions can also be injected in active fields to enhance gas or oil recovery. We examine the optimal scale and timing of these different capturing and storage options in a dynamic model of an economy subject to a carbon budget. We consider the socially optimal outcome as well as the outcome under <em>laissez-faire</em>. The social optimum can have different forms depending on the initial carbon budget, the fossil fuel resource stock and the stock of already injected CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> in active fields. The level and convexity of the costs of capturing, storing and producing renewable energy plays a role as well. We specify the conditions under which each possible sequence of regimes – no capturing, only enhanced recovery, only storage without enhanced recovery, a combination of both or only renewables – occurs. We quantify our analytical results by calibrating the model and running simulations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management\",\"volume\":\"125 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102976\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069624000500/pdfft?md5=9c7b28db25f57931448332d680db5e88&pid=1-s2.0-S0095069624000500-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069624000500\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069624000500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为实现《巴黎协定》的宏伟目标,在盐穹顶或不活跃油田进行碳捕集与封存被认为是一个极具吸引力的选择。捕获的二氧化碳排放也可以注入活跃油田,以提高天然气或石油的采收率。我们在一个受碳预算限制的经济动态模型中,研究了这些不同捕集与封存方案的最佳规模和时机。我们考虑了社会最优结果和自由放任下的结果。根据初始碳预算、化石燃料资源存量和活跃油田中已注入的二氧化碳存量的不同,社会最优结果可能有不同的形式。捕获、储存和生产可再生能源的成本水平和凸性也起着作用。我们明确了每种可能的制度序列--不捕集、仅强化回收、仅封存而不强化回收、两者结合或仅可再生能源--发生的条件。我们通过校准模型和运行模拟来量化我们的分析结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carbon capture: Storage vs. Utilization

Carbon capture and storage in salt domes or in inactive fields is seen as an appealing option to meet the ambitious objectives of the Paris Agreement. Captured CO2 emissions can also be injected in active fields to enhance gas or oil recovery. We examine the optimal scale and timing of these different capturing and storage options in a dynamic model of an economy subject to a carbon budget. We consider the socially optimal outcome as well as the outcome under laissez-faire. The social optimum can have different forms depending on the initial carbon budget, the fossil fuel resource stock and the stock of already injected CO2 in active fields. The level and convexity of the costs of capturing, storing and producing renewable energy plays a role as well. We specify the conditions under which each possible sequence of regimes – no capturing, only enhanced recovery, only storage without enhanced recovery, a combination of both or only renewables – occurs. We quantify our analytical results by calibrating the model and running simulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Economics and Management publishes theoretical and empirical papers devoted to specific natural resources and environmental issues. For consideration, papers should (1) contain a substantial element embodying the linkage between economic systems and environmental and natural resources systems or (2) be of substantial importance in understanding the management and/or social control of the economy in its relations with the natural environment. Although the general orientation of the journal is toward economics, interdisciplinary papers by researchers in other fields of interest to resource and environmental economists will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信