综合耕作制度在控制土地退化和提高植物多样性方面的作用:泰国东北部的一个案例

Ritdecha Chuanrum , Rajendra P. Shrestha
{"title":"综合耕作制度在控制土地退化和提高植物多样性方面的作用:泰国东北部的一个案例","authors":"Ritdecha Chuanrum ,&nbsp;Rajendra P. Shrestha","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2024.100086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While agriculture provides livelihood to rural poor, it has also been the reason of land degradation and biodiversity loss over time. Although the Integrated Farming Systems (IFS) are promoted to address these issues, their adoption among local farmers has been slow. The adoption is contextual affected by local conditions and factors. To understand the role of IFS in land degradation control and plant diversity enhancement, the objective of this study was to examine the determinants of farmers’ adoption of IFS practices and investigate the role of IFS in land degradation control and plant diversity enhancement on farmlands. Combining socioeconomic survey, econometrics, and ecological assessment techniques, the data representing different types of land degradation and sub-plot level plant diversity were collected using both farmer interviews and field measurements for two groups farmers, those who have adopted some sort of IFS, and other who have not. When compared with non-IFS as base category, the results indicated that education and income positively influenced IFS adoption with a marginal effect of 0.035 and 0.001, respectively, contrasting with the negative impact of landholding size with a marginal effect of -0.081. IFS adoption led to reduced land degradation of various forms as perceived by the farmers, particularly reduced soil acidification with marginal effect of 2.52, soil erosion (2.071), and enhanced plant diversity as shown by the indices, Shannon-Weiner – 1.94, Inverse Simpson – 6.14, species richness – 10.65 for IFS plots compared to 1.03, 2.28, 5.06, respectively for the non-IFS plots. The findings offer valuable insights for agricultural extension authorities and local farmers, emphasizing the benefits of IFS practices. The study also underscores not only the environment gains of IFS practices but also holds the potential for long-term economic and ecological benefits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911924000169/pdfft?md5=44342f7cc2aa4ee58e9514aabf298f99&pid=1-s2.0-S2949911924000169-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of integrated farming systems in land degradation control and plant diversity enhancement: A case of northeast Thailand\",\"authors\":\"Ritdecha Chuanrum ,&nbsp;Rajendra P. Shrestha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.farsys.2024.100086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>While agriculture provides livelihood to rural poor, it has also been the reason of land degradation and biodiversity loss over time. Although the Integrated Farming Systems (IFS) are promoted to address these issues, their adoption among local farmers has been slow. The adoption is contextual affected by local conditions and factors. To understand the role of IFS in land degradation control and plant diversity enhancement, the objective of this study was to examine the determinants of farmers’ adoption of IFS practices and investigate the role of IFS in land degradation control and plant diversity enhancement on farmlands. Combining socioeconomic survey, econometrics, and ecological assessment techniques, the data representing different types of land degradation and sub-plot level plant diversity were collected using both farmer interviews and field measurements for two groups farmers, those who have adopted some sort of IFS, and other who have not. When compared with non-IFS as base category, the results indicated that education and income positively influenced IFS adoption with a marginal effect of 0.035 and 0.001, respectively, contrasting with the negative impact of landholding size with a marginal effect of -0.081. IFS adoption led to reduced land degradation of various forms as perceived by the farmers, particularly reduced soil acidification with marginal effect of 2.52, soil erosion (2.071), and enhanced plant diversity as shown by the indices, Shannon-Weiner – 1.94, Inverse Simpson – 6.14, species richness – 10.65 for IFS plots compared to 1.03, 2.28, 5.06, respectively for the non-IFS plots. The findings offer valuable insights for agricultural extension authorities and local farmers, emphasizing the benefits of IFS practices. The study also underscores not only the environment gains of IFS practices but also holds the potential for long-term economic and ecological benefits.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farming System\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100086\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911924000169/pdfft?md5=44342f7cc2aa4ee58e9514aabf298f99&pid=1-s2.0-S2949911924000169-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farming System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911924000169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farming System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911924000169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业在为农村贫困人口提供生计的同时,也是造成土地退化和生物多样性丧失的原因。虽然综合耕作系统(IFS)是为解决这些问题而推广的,但在当地农民中的应用却很缓慢。采用情况受当地条件和因素的影响。为了解综合耕作制度在控制土地退化和提高植物多样性方面的作用,本研究旨在探讨农民采用综合耕作制度的决定因素,并研究综合耕作制度在控制土地退化和提高农田植物多样性方面的作用。研究结合了社会经济调查、计量经济学和生态评估技术,通过农民访谈和实地测量,收集了代表不同类型土地退化和小块农田植物多样性的数据。结果表明,教育和收入对采用综合农作战略有积极影响,边际效应分别为 0.035 和 0.001,而土地保有量对采用综合农作战略有消极影响,边际效应为-0.081。农民认为采用综合农作战略减少了各种形式的土地退化,尤其是减少了土壤酸化(边际效应为 2.52)、水土流失(2.071),并提高了植物多样性,如综合农作战略地块的香农-韦纳指数(Shannon-Weiner)-1.94、逆辛普森指数(Inverse Simpson)-6.14、物种丰富度-10.65,而非综合农作战略地块分别为 1.03、2.28 和 5.06。研究结果为农业推广机构和当地农民提供了宝贵的见解,强调了综合融资战略做法的益处。这项研究还强调,综合节水措施不仅能改善环境,还可能带来长期的经济和生态效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of integrated farming systems in land degradation control and plant diversity enhancement: A case of northeast Thailand

While agriculture provides livelihood to rural poor, it has also been the reason of land degradation and biodiversity loss over time. Although the Integrated Farming Systems (IFS) are promoted to address these issues, their adoption among local farmers has been slow. The adoption is contextual affected by local conditions and factors. To understand the role of IFS in land degradation control and plant diversity enhancement, the objective of this study was to examine the determinants of farmers’ adoption of IFS practices and investigate the role of IFS in land degradation control and plant diversity enhancement on farmlands. Combining socioeconomic survey, econometrics, and ecological assessment techniques, the data representing different types of land degradation and sub-plot level plant diversity were collected using both farmer interviews and field measurements for two groups farmers, those who have adopted some sort of IFS, and other who have not. When compared with non-IFS as base category, the results indicated that education and income positively influenced IFS adoption with a marginal effect of 0.035 and 0.001, respectively, contrasting with the negative impact of landholding size with a marginal effect of -0.081. IFS adoption led to reduced land degradation of various forms as perceived by the farmers, particularly reduced soil acidification with marginal effect of 2.52, soil erosion (2.071), and enhanced plant diversity as shown by the indices, Shannon-Weiner – 1.94, Inverse Simpson – 6.14, species richness – 10.65 for IFS plots compared to 1.03, 2.28, 5.06, respectively for the non-IFS plots. The findings offer valuable insights for agricultural extension authorities and local farmers, emphasizing the benefits of IFS practices. The study also underscores not only the environment gains of IFS practices but also holds the potential for long-term economic and ecological benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信