基于粘度的孔隙压力产生模型和可液化土壤假塑性行为影响因素的实验研究

IF 3.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Lucia Mele , Stefania Lirer , Alessandro Flora
{"title":"基于粘度的孔隙压力产生模型和可液化土壤假塑性行为影响因素的实验研究","authors":"Lucia Mele ,&nbsp;Stefania Lirer ,&nbsp;Alessandro Flora","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2024.101466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fully liquefied soils behave like viscous fluids, and models developed within the framework of soil mechanics fail to catch their behaviour on the verge of liquefaction or after it. Several research works have shown that modelling the liquefied soil as a fluid is physically more convincing. Such an equivalent fluid can be characterised via an apparent viscosity (η) (sharply dropping when liquefaction is triggered) which can be modelled as a power law function of the shear strain rate (pseudo-plastic fluid), depending on two parameters: the <em>fluid consistency coefficient</em> (<em>k</em>) and the <em>liquidity index</em> (<em>n</em>). With this approach, it is possible to consider a simple correlation between the equivalent viscosity and pore pressure increments independent on the equivalent number of cycles, whose parameters can be calibrated from the results of stress-controlled laboratory tests. The paper investigates the effect of some relevant experimental factors (effective vertical stress, stress path, frequency and waveform of the applied cyclic load, soil fabric and pre-existing shear stress) on the apparent viscosity of soils during their transition from the solid to the liquefied state, and therefore also on the pore pressure increments generated by the stress path. To do that, the results of stress-controlled laboratory tests performed in a sophisticated simple shear apparatus, along with published data, have been interpreted in terms of the apparent viscosity. Simple correlations in terms of viscosity-based pore pressure generation and pseudo-plastic behaviour are proposed and confirmed from the results of 1D non-linear site response analysis for the case study of Scortichino (Italy).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":"64 3","pages":"Article 101466"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624000441/pdfft?md5=345eba1debf9da1c96d8b0f24f8a6b47&pid=1-s2.0-S0038080624000441-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental study of factors affecting the viscosity-based pore pressure generation model and the pseudo plastic behaviour of liquefiable soils\",\"authors\":\"Lucia Mele ,&nbsp;Stefania Lirer ,&nbsp;Alessandro Flora\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sandf.2024.101466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Fully liquefied soils behave like viscous fluids, and models developed within the framework of soil mechanics fail to catch their behaviour on the verge of liquefaction or after it. Several research works have shown that modelling the liquefied soil as a fluid is physically more convincing. Such an equivalent fluid can be characterised via an apparent viscosity (η) (sharply dropping when liquefaction is triggered) which can be modelled as a power law function of the shear strain rate (pseudo-plastic fluid), depending on two parameters: the <em>fluid consistency coefficient</em> (<em>k</em>) and the <em>liquidity index</em> (<em>n</em>). With this approach, it is possible to consider a simple correlation between the equivalent viscosity and pore pressure increments independent on the equivalent number of cycles, whose parameters can be calibrated from the results of stress-controlled laboratory tests. The paper investigates the effect of some relevant experimental factors (effective vertical stress, stress path, frequency and waveform of the applied cyclic load, soil fabric and pre-existing shear stress) on the apparent viscosity of soils during their transition from the solid to the liquefied state, and therefore also on the pore pressure increments generated by the stress path. To do that, the results of stress-controlled laboratory tests performed in a sophisticated simple shear apparatus, along with published data, have been interpreted in terms of the apparent viscosity. Simple correlations in terms of viscosity-based pore pressure generation and pseudo-plastic behaviour are proposed and confirmed from the results of 1D non-linear site response analysis for the case study of Scortichino (Italy).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"volume\":\"64 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624000441/pdfft?md5=345eba1debf9da1c96d8b0f24f8a6b47&pid=1-s2.0-S0038080624000441-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624000441\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624000441","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

完全液化土壤的行为类似于粘性流体,而在土壤力学框架内开发的模型无法捕捉其在液化边缘或液化后的行为。多项研究表明,将液化土模拟为流体在物理上更有说服力。这种等效流体可以通过表观粘度 (η)(在液化触发时急剧下降)来表征,该粘度可模拟为剪切应变率的幂律函数(假塑性流体),取决于两个参数:流体稠度系数 (k) 和流动性指数 (n)。利用这种方法,可以考虑在等效粘度和孔隙压力增量之间建立一种与等效循环次数无关的简单相关关系,其参数可根据应力控制实验室试验的结果进行校准。本文研究了一些相关实验因素(有效垂直应力、应力路径、施加循环载荷的频率和波形、土壤结构和预先存在的剪应力)对土壤从固态向液化状态过渡期间表观粘度的影响,以及因此对应力路径产生的孔隙压力增量的影响。为此,我们用表观粘度来解释在复杂的简易剪切仪器上进行的应力控制实验室试验的结果以及已公布的数据。根据斯科尔蒂奇诺(意大利)案例研究的一维非线性场地响应分析结果,提出了基于粘度的孔隙压力产生和假塑性行为的简单关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental study of factors affecting the viscosity-based pore pressure generation model and the pseudo plastic behaviour of liquefiable soils

Fully liquefied soils behave like viscous fluids, and models developed within the framework of soil mechanics fail to catch their behaviour on the verge of liquefaction or after it. Several research works have shown that modelling the liquefied soil as a fluid is physically more convincing. Such an equivalent fluid can be characterised via an apparent viscosity (η) (sharply dropping when liquefaction is triggered) which can be modelled as a power law function of the shear strain rate (pseudo-plastic fluid), depending on two parameters: the fluid consistency coefficient (k) and the liquidity index (n). With this approach, it is possible to consider a simple correlation between the equivalent viscosity and pore pressure increments independent on the equivalent number of cycles, whose parameters can be calibrated from the results of stress-controlled laboratory tests. The paper investigates the effect of some relevant experimental factors (effective vertical stress, stress path, frequency and waveform of the applied cyclic load, soil fabric and pre-existing shear stress) on the apparent viscosity of soils during their transition from the solid to the liquefied state, and therefore also on the pore pressure increments generated by the stress path. To do that, the results of stress-controlled laboratory tests performed in a sophisticated simple shear apparatus, along with published data, have been interpreted in terms of the apparent viscosity. Simple correlations in terms of viscosity-based pore pressure generation and pseudo-plastic behaviour are proposed and confirmed from the results of 1D non-linear site response analysis for the case study of Scortichino (Italy).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soils and Foundations
Soils and Foundations 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020. Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信