Florian Lüskow , Tanya Balaji , Evgeny A. Pakhomov
{"title":"偏差干重:七种中上层鳞片鱼类的残余水分问题","authors":"Florian Lüskow , Tanya Balaji , Evgeny A. Pakhomov","doi":"10.1016/j.jembe.2024.152013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pelagic tunicates are cosmopolitan and, at times, highly abundant members of open-ocean ecosystems that are important for food web dynamics and biogeochemical cycling. Ecosystem models often use wet weights to parameterize biota. This may be erroneous for gelatinous plankton, such as pelagic tunicates, with high water content, compared to crustaceans. Furthermore, poorly quantified residual water should also be corrected when using dry weights for parameterization. This study aims to estimate the residual water content (as well as elemental and organic contents) for seven tunicate species. Tunicates (one pyrosome and six salps, <em>N</em> = 107), were collected during several research expeditions and analyzed for inter- and intraspecific variability. The H-surplus method was applied for the residual water content calculation. The residual water ranged from 1.5 to 20.6% (average ± SD: 8.9 ± 4.2%) of dry weight across species and did not differ significantly between taxonomic orders. Furthermore, the life cycle stage (blastozooid versus oozooid) and tissue type (tunic versus whole organism) were found to be insignificant in explaining residual water content patterns. Elemental and organic contents, however, were lower in tunics than in whole organisms, and in the salp <em>Thetys vagina</em>, stomachs had significantly higher elemental and organic contents compared to whole organisms. Effects of size and drying method (oven versus freeze-drying) significantly impacted the residual water content of pelagic tunicates. Accounting for residual water content in zooplankton is discussed from an ecological perspective and is strongly advised for future modeling studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology","volume":"575 ","pages":"Article 152013"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022098124000285/pdfft?md5=30a8408dc03a29bceccbde161e514deb&pid=1-s2.0-S0022098124000285-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biased dry weight: The matter of residual water in seven pelagic tunicate species\",\"authors\":\"Florian Lüskow , Tanya Balaji , Evgeny A. Pakhomov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jembe.2024.152013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Pelagic tunicates are cosmopolitan and, at times, highly abundant members of open-ocean ecosystems that are important for food web dynamics and biogeochemical cycling. Ecosystem models often use wet weights to parameterize biota. This may be erroneous for gelatinous plankton, such as pelagic tunicates, with high water content, compared to crustaceans. Furthermore, poorly quantified residual water should also be corrected when using dry weights for parameterization. This study aims to estimate the residual water content (as well as elemental and organic contents) for seven tunicate species. Tunicates (one pyrosome and six salps, <em>N</em> = 107), were collected during several research expeditions and analyzed for inter- and intraspecific variability. The H-surplus method was applied for the residual water content calculation. The residual water ranged from 1.5 to 20.6% (average ± SD: 8.9 ± 4.2%) of dry weight across species and did not differ significantly between taxonomic orders. Furthermore, the life cycle stage (blastozooid versus oozooid) and tissue type (tunic versus whole organism) were found to be insignificant in explaining residual water content patterns. Elemental and organic contents, however, were lower in tunics than in whole organisms, and in the salp <em>Thetys vagina</em>, stomachs had significantly higher elemental and organic contents compared to whole organisms. Effects of size and drying method (oven versus freeze-drying) significantly impacted the residual water content of pelagic tunicates. Accounting for residual water content in zooplankton is discussed from an ecological perspective and is strongly advised for future modeling studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology\",\"volume\":\"575 \",\"pages\":\"Article 152013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022098124000285/pdfft?md5=30a8408dc03a29bceccbde161e514deb&pid=1-s2.0-S0022098124000285-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022098124000285\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022098124000285","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biased dry weight: The matter of residual water in seven pelagic tunicate species
Pelagic tunicates are cosmopolitan and, at times, highly abundant members of open-ocean ecosystems that are important for food web dynamics and biogeochemical cycling. Ecosystem models often use wet weights to parameterize biota. This may be erroneous for gelatinous plankton, such as pelagic tunicates, with high water content, compared to crustaceans. Furthermore, poorly quantified residual water should also be corrected when using dry weights for parameterization. This study aims to estimate the residual water content (as well as elemental and organic contents) for seven tunicate species. Tunicates (one pyrosome and six salps, N = 107), were collected during several research expeditions and analyzed for inter- and intraspecific variability. The H-surplus method was applied for the residual water content calculation. The residual water ranged from 1.5 to 20.6% (average ± SD: 8.9 ± 4.2%) of dry weight across species and did not differ significantly between taxonomic orders. Furthermore, the life cycle stage (blastozooid versus oozooid) and tissue type (tunic versus whole organism) were found to be insignificant in explaining residual water content patterns. Elemental and organic contents, however, were lower in tunics than in whole organisms, and in the salp Thetys vagina, stomachs had significantly higher elemental and organic contents compared to whole organisms. Effects of size and drying method (oven versus freeze-drying) significantly impacted the residual water content of pelagic tunicates. Accounting for residual water content in zooplankton is discussed from an ecological perspective and is strongly advised for future modeling studies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology provides a forum for experimental ecological research on marine organisms in relation to their environment. Topic areas include studies that focus on biochemistry, physiology, behavior, genetics, and ecological theory. The main emphasis of the Journal lies in hypothesis driven experimental work, both from the laboratory and the field. Natural experiments or descriptive studies that elucidate fundamental ecological processes are welcome. Submissions should have a broad ecological framework beyond the specific study organism or geographic region.
Short communications that highlight emerging issues and exciting discoveries within five printed pages will receive a rapid turnaround. Papers describing important new analytical, computational, experimental and theoretical techniques and methods are encouraged and will be highlighted as Methodological Advances. We welcome proposals for Review Papers synthesizing a specific field within marine ecology. Finally, the journal aims to publish Special Issues at regular intervals synthesizing a particular field of marine science. All printed papers undergo a peer review process before being accepted and will receive a first decision within three months.