用于双环车辆控制设计的优化工具:分析和偏航率跟踪案例研究

IF 2.5 3区 计算机科学 Q2 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Federico Dettù , Giacomo Delcaro , Simone Formentin , Stefano Varisco , Sergio Matteo Savaresi
{"title":"用于双环车辆控制设计的优化工具:分析和偏航率跟踪案例研究","authors":"Federico Dettù ,&nbsp;Giacomo Delcaro ,&nbsp;Simone Formentin ,&nbsp;Stefano Varisco ,&nbsp;Sergio Matteo Savaresi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcon.2024.100998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Given the urgent need to simplify the end-of-line tuning of complex vehicle dynamics controllers, the Twin-in-the-Loop Control (TiL-C) approach was recently proposed in the automotive field. In TiL-C, a digital twin is run in real time on-board the vehicle to compute a nominal control action; an additional controller is used to compensate for the mismatch between the simulator and the actual vehicle. As the digital twin is assumed to be the best replica available of the real plant, the key issue in TiL-C becomes the tuning of the compensator, which must be performed relying on data only. In this paper, we investigate the use of different black-box optimization techniques for the calibration of the compensator. More specifically, we compare the initially proposed Bayesian Optimization (BO) approach with Virtual Reference Feedback Tuning (VRFT), a one-shot direct data-driven design method, and with Set Membership Global Optimization (SMGO), a recently proposed black-box optimization method. The analysis will be carried out within a professional multibody simulation environment on a novel TiL-C application case study – the yaw-rate tracking problem – to further prove the TiL-C effectiveness on a challenging problem. Simulations will show that the VRFT approach is capable of providing a well-tuned controller after a single iteration, while 10 to 15 iterations are necessary for refining it with global optimizers. Also, SMGO is shown to reduce the computational effort required by BO significantly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50489,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization tools for Twin-in-the-Loop vehicle control design: analysis and yaw-rate tracking case study\",\"authors\":\"Federico Dettù ,&nbsp;Giacomo Delcaro ,&nbsp;Simone Formentin ,&nbsp;Stefano Varisco ,&nbsp;Sergio Matteo Savaresi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejcon.2024.100998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Given the urgent need to simplify the end-of-line tuning of complex vehicle dynamics controllers, the Twin-in-the-Loop Control (TiL-C) approach was recently proposed in the automotive field. In TiL-C, a digital twin is run in real time on-board the vehicle to compute a nominal control action; an additional controller is used to compensate for the mismatch between the simulator and the actual vehicle. As the digital twin is assumed to be the best replica available of the real plant, the key issue in TiL-C becomes the tuning of the compensator, which must be performed relying on data only. In this paper, we investigate the use of different black-box optimization techniques for the calibration of the compensator. More specifically, we compare the initially proposed Bayesian Optimization (BO) approach with Virtual Reference Feedback Tuning (VRFT), a one-shot direct data-driven design method, and with Set Membership Global Optimization (SMGO), a recently proposed black-box optimization method. The analysis will be carried out within a professional multibody simulation environment on a novel TiL-C application case study – the yaw-rate tracking problem – to further prove the TiL-C effectiveness on a challenging problem. Simulations will show that the VRFT approach is capable of providing a well-tuned controller after a single iteration, while 10 to 15 iterations are necessary for refining it with global optimizers. Also, SMGO is shown to reduce the computational effort required by BO significantly.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Control\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S094735802400058X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S094735802400058X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于迫切需要简化复杂车辆动力学控制器的末端调整,最近在汽车领域提出了双环控制(TiL-C)方法。在 TiL-C 方法中,一个数字孪生系统在车辆上实时运行,以计算标称控制动作;一个附加控制器用于补偿模拟器与实际车辆之间的不匹配。由于假定数字孪生系统是真实工厂的最佳复制品,TiL-C 的关键问题就在于补偿器的调整,这必须仅依靠数据来完成。在本文中,我们研究了不同黑盒优化技术在补偿器校准中的应用。更具体地说,我们将最初提出的贝叶斯优化(BO)方法与虚拟参考反馈调谐(VRFT)(一种一次性的直接数据驱动设计方法)和集合成员全局优化(SMGO)(一种最近提出的黑箱优化方法)进行了比较。分析将在一个专业的多体仿真环境中进行,以一个新颖的 TiL-C 应用案例研究--偏航率跟踪问题--来进一步证明 TiL-C 在一个具有挑战性的问题上的有效性。仿真结果表明,VRFT 方法能够在单次迭代后提供调整良好的控制器,而使用全局优化器对其进行改进则需要 10 到 15 次迭代。此外,SMGO 还能显著减少 BO 所需的计算量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization tools for Twin-in-the-Loop vehicle control design: analysis and yaw-rate tracking case study

Given the urgent need to simplify the end-of-line tuning of complex vehicle dynamics controllers, the Twin-in-the-Loop Control (TiL-C) approach was recently proposed in the automotive field. In TiL-C, a digital twin is run in real time on-board the vehicle to compute a nominal control action; an additional controller is used to compensate for the mismatch between the simulator and the actual vehicle. As the digital twin is assumed to be the best replica available of the real plant, the key issue in TiL-C becomes the tuning of the compensator, which must be performed relying on data only. In this paper, we investigate the use of different black-box optimization techniques for the calibration of the compensator. More specifically, we compare the initially proposed Bayesian Optimization (BO) approach with Virtual Reference Feedback Tuning (VRFT), a one-shot direct data-driven design method, and with Set Membership Global Optimization (SMGO), a recently proposed black-box optimization method. The analysis will be carried out within a professional multibody simulation environment on a novel TiL-C application case study – the yaw-rate tracking problem – to further prove the TiL-C effectiveness on a challenging problem. Simulations will show that the VRFT approach is capable of providing a well-tuned controller after a single iteration, while 10 to 15 iterations are necessary for refining it with global optimizers. Also, SMGO is shown to reduce the computational effort required by BO significantly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Control
European Journal of Control 工程技术-自动化与控制系统
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
131
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Control Association (EUCA) has among its objectives to promote the development of the discipline. Apart from the European Control Conferences, the European Journal of Control is the Association''s main channel for the dissemination of important contributions in the field. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality papers on the theory and practice of control and systems engineering. The scope of the Journal will be wide and cover all aspects of the discipline including methodologies, techniques and applications. Research in control and systems engineering is necessary to develop new concepts and tools which enhance our understanding and improve our ability to design and implement high performance control systems. Submitted papers should stress the practical motivations and relevance of their results. The design and implementation of a successful control system requires the use of a range of techniques: Modelling Robustness Analysis Identification Optimization Control Law Design Numerical analysis Fault Detection, and so on.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信