Thomas D. McIlroy, Stacey L. Parker, Blake M. McKimmie
{"title":"问,但你可能得不到:未获答复的主管支持量表开发和每日日记研究","authors":"Thomas D. McIlroy, Stacey L. Parker, Blake M. McKimmie","doi":"10.1007/s10869-024-09950-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Supervisor support is widely studied in the organizational literature, yet existing measures tend to exclusively focus on either the provision or the seeking of support, while overlooking instances where employees seek support but do not receive it – an experience termed <i>unanswered supervisor support</i> (USS). In Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 312 employees), we developed a measure of the experience of USS and examined its reliability and validity. In Study 2, we provided further support for the measure and, using a diary methodology, examined daily fluctuations in the experience and consequences of USS. Drawing from self-determination theory, we expected that need satisfaction and frustration would mediate the effects of USS on emotional exhaustion, perceived leadership effectiveness, and helping behavior. For five workdays, 199 employees completed a survey at the end of each workday. As predicted, on days when employees experienced USS, they had greater need frustration and emotional exhaustion. They also had lower need satisfaction and perceived their supervisor as a less effective leader. The association between USS and emotional exhaustion was mediated by need frustration – in particular, frustration of the needs for competence and relatedness. Further analyses showed that relatedness frustration mediated the effects of USS on employees’ perceptions of their leader’s effectiveness. The experience of USS in daily work life has implications for employees’ well-being and the way they perceive their supervisor. Thus, employees, supervisors, and organizations need to be aware of the impact of USS and how to prevent and manage its occurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Psychology","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ask, but You Might not Receive: Unanswered Supervisor Support Scale Development and a Daily Diary Study\",\"authors\":\"Thomas D. McIlroy, Stacey L. Parker, Blake M. McKimmie\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10869-024-09950-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Supervisor support is widely studied in the organizational literature, yet existing measures tend to exclusively focus on either the provision or the seeking of support, while overlooking instances where employees seek support but do not receive it – an experience termed <i>unanswered supervisor support</i> (USS). In Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 312 employees), we developed a measure of the experience of USS and examined its reliability and validity. In Study 2, we provided further support for the measure and, using a diary methodology, examined daily fluctuations in the experience and consequences of USS. Drawing from self-determination theory, we expected that need satisfaction and frustration would mediate the effects of USS on emotional exhaustion, perceived leadership effectiveness, and helping behavior. For five workdays, 199 employees completed a survey at the end of each workday. As predicted, on days when employees experienced USS, they had greater need frustration and emotional exhaustion. They also had lower need satisfaction and perceived their supervisor as a less effective leader. The association between USS and emotional exhaustion was mediated by need frustration – in particular, frustration of the needs for competence and relatedness. Further analyses showed that relatedness frustration mediated the effects of USS on employees’ perceptions of their leader’s effectiveness. The experience of USS in daily work life has implications for employees’ well-being and the way they perceive their supervisor. Thus, employees, supervisors, and organizations need to be aware of the impact of USS and how to prevent and manage its occurrence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business and Psychology\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business and Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09950-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09950-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
组织文献对主管支持进行了广泛的研究,但现有的测量方法往往只关注提供或寻求支持,而忽略了员工寻求支持但未得到支持的情况,这种情况被称为 "未获回应的主管支持"(USS)。在研究 1(N = 312 名员工)中,我们开发了一种衡量 USS 体验的方法,并检验了其信度和效度。在研究 2 中,我们为该测量方法提供了进一步的支持,并采用日记法研究了 USS 体验和后果的日常波动。根据自我决定理论,我们预计需求满足感和挫败感会调节 USS 对情绪衰竭、感知领导效能和帮助行为的影响。在五个工作日中,199 名员工在每个工作日结束时填写了一份调查问卷。正如预测的那样,在经历 USS 的日子里,员工的需求挫败感和情绪衰竭程度更高。同时,他们的需求满意度也较低,并认为他们的上司是一个效率较低的领导者。需求受挫--尤其是能力需求和相关性需求受挫--对全职培训和情绪衰竭之间的关联起到了中介作用。进一步的分析表明,相关性挫折在员工对其领导者效率的看法上对全员服务产生了中介作用。在日常工作生活中,USS 的体验会影响到员工的幸福感以及他们对上司的看法。因此,员工、主管和组织都需要意识到USS的影响,以及如何预防和管理USS的发生。
Ask, but You Might not Receive: Unanswered Supervisor Support Scale Development and a Daily Diary Study
Supervisor support is widely studied in the organizational literature, yet existing measures tend to exclusively focus on either the provision or the seeking of support, while overlooking instances where employees seek support but do not receive it – an experience termed unanswered supervisor support (USS). In Study 1 (N = 312 employees), we developed a measure of the experience of USS and examined its reliability and validity. In Study 2, we provided further support for the measure and, using a diary methodology, examined daily fluctuations in the experience and consequences of USS. Drawing from self-determination theory, we expected that need satisfaction and frustration would mediate the effects of USS on emotional exhaustion, perceived leadership effectiveness, and helping behavior. For five workdays, 199 employees completed a survey at the end of each workday. As predicted, on days when employees experienced USS, they had greater need frustration and emotional exhaustion. They also had lower need satisfaction and perceived their supervisor as a less effective leader. The association between USS and emotional exhaustion was mediated by need frustration – in particular, frustration of the needs for competence and relatedness. Further analyses showed that relatedness frustration mediated the effects of USS on employees’ perceptions of their leader’s effectiveness. The experience of USS in daily work life has implications for employees’ well-being and the way they perceive their supervisor. Thus, employees, supervisors, and organizations need to be aware of the impact of USS and how to prevent and manage its occurrence.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business and Psychology (JBP) is an international outlet publishing high quality research designed to advance organizational science and practice. Since its inception in 1986, the journal has published impactful scholarship in Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Organizational Behavior, Human Resources Management, Work Psychology, Occupational Psychology, and Vocational Psychology.
Typical subject matters include
Team processes and effectiveness
Customer service and satisfaction
Employee recruitment, selection, and promotion
Employee engagement and withdrawal
Organizational culture and climate
Training, development and coaching
Mentoring and socialization
Performance management, appraisal and feedback
Workplace diversity
Leadership
Workplace health, stress, and safety
Employee attitudes and satisfaction
Careers and retirement
Organizational communication
Technology and work
Employee motivation and job design
Organizational change and development
Employee citizenship and deviance
Organizational effectiveness
Work-nonwork/work-family
Rigorous quantitative, qualitative, field-based, and lab-based empirical studies are welcome. Interdisciplinary scholarship is valued and encouraged. Submitted manuscripts should be well-grounded conceptually and make meaningful contributions to scientific understandingsand/or the advancement of science-based practice.
The Journal of Business and Psychology is
- A high quality/impactful outlet for organizational science research
- A journal dedicated to bridging the science/practice divide
- A journal striving to create interdisciplinary connections
For details on submitting manuscripts, please read the author guidelines found in the far right menu.