学校主动和大规模枪击事件应急准备演习

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jaclyn Schildkraut, Emily A. Greene-Colozzi, Amanda B. Nickerson
{"title":"学校主动和大规模枪击事件应急准备演习","authors":"Jaclyn Schildkraut, Emily A. Greene-Colozzi, Amanda B. Nickerson","doi":"10.1007/s11920-024-01502-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>There is widespread use of emergency preparedness drills in public K-12 schools across the US, but considerable variability exists in the types of protocols used and how these practices are conducted. This review examines research into both “lockdown drills” and “active shooter drills” as it relates to their impact on participants across different outcomes and evaluations of their procedural integrity.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>A number of studies on lockdown drills yielded largely consistent findings about their impacts, whereas findings related to the effects of active shooter drills are less uniform. The research also demonstrated that lockdown drills, though not active shooter drills, can help participants build skill mastery to be able to successfully deploy the procedure.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>Differences in how drills impact participants and whether they cultivate skill mastery are largely attributable to the type of drill being conducted. This review suggests that employing clearly defined drill procedures incorporating best practices, coupled with instructional training, can help schools prepare for emergencies without creating trauma for participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":11057,"journal":{"name":"Current Psychiatry Reports","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Preparedness Drills for Active and Mass Shootings in Schools\",\"authors\":\"Jaclyn Schildkraut, Emily A. Greene-Colozzi, Amanda B. Nickerson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11920-024-01502-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>There is widespread use of emergency preparedness drills in public K-12 schools across the US, but considerable variability exists in the types of protocols used and how these practices are conducted. This review examines research into both “lockdown drills” and “active shooter drills” as it relates to their impact on participants across different outcomes and evaluations of their procedural integrity.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Recent Findings</h3><p>A number of studies on lockdown drills yielded largely consistent findings about their impacts, whereas findings related to the effects of active shooter drills are less uniform. The research also demonstrated that lockdown drills, though not active shooter drills, can help participants build skill mastery to be able to successfully deploy the procedure.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Summary</h3><p>Differences in how drills impact participants and whether they cultivate skill mastery are largely attributable to the type of drill being conducted. This review suggests that employing clearly defined drill procedures incorporating best practices, coupled with instructional training, can help schools prepare for emergencies without creating trauma for participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Psychiatry Reports\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Psychiatry Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01502-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Psychiatry Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01502-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的美国公立 K-12 学校广泛使用应急准备演习,但所使用的协议类型和演习方式存在很大差异。本综述考察了有关 "封锁演习 "和 "主动枪手演习 "的研究,因为这两种演习对参与者产生了不同的影响,并对其程序的完整性进行了评估。最近的研究结果一些有关封锁演习的研究对其影响得出了基本一致的结论,而有关主动枪手演习影响的结论则不太一致。研究还表明,封锁演习(尽管不是主动枪击演习)可以帮助参与者掌握技能,从而能够成功地部署程序。总结演习对参与者的影响以及是否培养了技能掌握能力方面的差异在很大程度上取决于演习的类型。本综述表明,采用定义明确的演习程序并结合最佳实践,再加上指导培训,可以帮助学校在不给参与者造成心理创伤的情况下为紧急情况做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emergency Preparedness Drills for Active and Mass Shootings in Schools

Purpose of Review

There is widespread use of emergency preparedness drills in public K-12 schools across the US, but considerable variability exists in the types of protocols used and how these practices are conducted. This review examines research into both “lockdown drills” and “active shooter drills” as it relates to their impact on participants across different outcomes and evaluations of their procedural integrity.

Recent Findings

A number of studies on lockdown drills yielded largely consistent findings about their impacts, whereas findings related to the effects of active shooter drills are less uniform. The research also demonstrated that lockdown drills, though not active shooter drills, can help participants build skill mastery to be able to successfully deploy the procedure.

Summary

Differences in how drills impact participants and whether they cultivate skill mastery are largely attributable to the type of drill being conducted. This review suggests that employing clearly defined drill procedures incorporating best practices, coupled with instructional training, can help schools prepare for emergencies without creating trauma for participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published research in psychiatry. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care of those affected by psychiatric disorders. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anxiety, medicopsychiatric disorders, and schizophrenia and other related psychotic disorders. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信