通过口内 3D 扫描定量评估牙间隙咬合下的近端接触面积间隙变化特征:近端紧密接触的食物嵌塞

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hongyan Wang MDSc, Hu Chen PhD, Sukun Tian PhD, Yuchun Sun PhD, Feng Wu PhD
{"title":"通过口内 3D 扫描定量评估牙间隙咬合下的近端接触面积间隙变化特征:近端紧密接触的食物嵌塞","authors":"Hongyan Wang MDSc,&nbsp;Hu Chen PhD,&nbsp;Sukun Tian PhD,&nbsp;Yuchun Sun PhD,&nbsp;Feng Wu PhD","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to present three indicators that represent the proximal contact area gap change under intercuspal occlusion and to see if and how these indicators influence food impaction with tight proximal contact.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Ninety volunteers were recruited for bite force measurement and intraoral scanning. Three-dimensional surface data and buccal bite data were obtained for 60 impacted and 60 non-impacted teeth. The scanning data were imported into the Geomagic Studio 2013 to measure three indicators, which included the gap change maximum (Δ<i>d</i><sub>m</sub>, μm), the buccolingual position of Δ<i>d</i><sub>m</sub> (P), and the gap expanded buccolingual range (S, mm). The difference between two groups of three indicators and their relationship with food impaction with tight proximal contact were analyzed by the <i>t</i> test, the Pearson chi-squared test, the nonparametric Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test, and the binary logistic regression analysis (<i>a</i> = 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All indicators (Δ<i>d</i><sub>m</sub>, P, and S) were statistically different (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.002, and <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) in the impacted and non-impacted groups. Food impaction with tight proximal contact was affected by Δ<i>d</i><sub>m</sub> and S (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.039), but not by P (<i>p</i> = 0.409).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The excessive increase of the gap change maximum and the gap expanded buccolingual range under bite force promoted the occurrence of food impaction with tight proximal contact.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Significance</h3>\n \n <p>The use of intraoral scanning to measure the characteristics of the proximal contact area gap change under bite force may help to deepen our understanding of the pathogenesis of food impaction with tight proximal contact. Importantly it can provide a reference basis for individualizing and quantifying occlusal adjustment treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative evaluation of the proximal contact area gap change characterization under intercuspal occlusion by intraoral 3D scanning: Food impaction with tight proximal contact\",\"authors\":\"Hongyan Wang MDSc,&nbsp;Hu Chen PhD,&nbsp;Sukun Tian PhD,&nbsp;Yuchun Sun PhD,&nbsp;Feng Wu PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jerd.13240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to present three indicators that represent the proximal contact area gap change under intercuspal occlusion and to see if and how these indicators influence food impaction with tight proximal contact.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ninety volunteers were recruited for bite force measurement and intraoral scanning. Three-dimensional surface data and buccal bite data were obtained for 60 impacted and 60 non-impacted teeth. The scanning data were imported into the Geomagic Studio 2013 to measure three indicators, which included the gap change maximum (Δ<i>d</i><sub>m</sub>, μm), the buccolingual position of Δ<i>d</i><sub>m</sub> (P), and the gap expanded buccolingual range (S, mm). The difference between two groups of three indicators and their relationship with food impaction with tight proximal contact were analyzed by the <i>t</i> test, the Pearson chi-squared test, the nonparametric Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test, and the binary logistic regression analysis (<i>a</i> = 0.05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>All indicators (Δ<i>d</i><sub>m</sub>, P, and S) were statistically different (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.002, and <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) in the impacted and non-impacted groups. Food impaction with tight proximal contact was affected by Δ<i>d</i><sub>m</sub> and S (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.039), but not by P (<i>p</i> = 0.409).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The excessive increase of the gap change maximum and the gap expanded buccolingual range under bite force promoted the occurrence of food impaction with tight proximal contact.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Clinical Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>The use of intraoral scanning to measure the characteristics of the proximal contact area gap change under bite force may help to deepen our understanding of the pathogenesis of food impaction with tight proximal contact. Importantly it can provide a reference basis for individualizing and quantifying occlusal adjustment treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jerd.13240\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jerd.13240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

材料和方法招募了 90 名志愿者进行咬合力测量和口内扫描。获得了 60 颗撞击牙和 60 颗非撞击牙的三维表面数据和颊咬合数据。将扫描数据导入 Geomagic Studio 2013 测量三项指标,包括间隙变化最大值(Δdm,μm)、Δdm 的颊舌向位置(P)和间隙扩大的颊舌向范围(S,mm)。结果所有指标(Δdm、P 和 S)在受影响组和非受影响组均有统计学差异(p < 0.001、p = 0.002 和 p < 0.001)。近端紧密接触的食物嵌塞受 Δdm 和 S 的影响(p < 0.001,p = 0.039),但不受 P 的影响(p = 0.409)。临床意义利用口内扫描测量咬合力作用下近侧接触区间隙变化的特征,有助于加深我们对近侧紧接触食物嵌塞发病机制的认识。重要的是,它可以为个性化和量化咬合调整治疗提供参考依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative evaluation of the proximal contact area gap change characterization under intercuspal occlusion by intraoral 3D scanning: Food impaction with tight proximal contact

Objective

This study aimed to present three indicators that represent the proximal contact area gap change under intercuspal occlusion and to see if and how these indicators influence food impaction with tight proximal contact.

Materials and Methods

Ninety volunteers were recruited for bite force measurement and intraoral scanning. Three-dimensional surface data and buccal bite data were obtained for 60 impacted and 60 non-impacted teeth. The scanning data were imported into the Geomagic Studio 2013 to measure three indicators, which included the gap change maximum (Δdm, μm), the buccolingual position of Δdm (P), and the gap expanded buccolingual range (S, mm). The difference between two groups of three indicators and their relationship with food impaction with tight proximal contact were analyzed by the t test, the Pearson chi-squared test, the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test, and the binary logistic regression analysis (a = 0.05).

Results

All indicators (Δdm, P, and S) were statistically different (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, and p < 0.001) in the impacted and non-impacted groups. Food impaction with tight proximal contact was affected by Δdm and S (p < 0.001, p = 0.039), but not by P (p = 0.409).

Conclusion

The excessive increase of the gap change maximum and the gap expanded buccolingual range under bite force promoted the occurrence of food impaction with tight proximal contact.

Clinical Significance

The use of intraoral scanning to measure the characteristics of the proximal contact area gap change under bite force may help to deepen our understanding of the pathogenesis of food impaction with tight proximal contact. Importantly it can provide a reference basis for individualizing and quantifying occlusal adjustment treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信