利用新兴资源回收技术为农村农业地区畜禽粪便可持续管理提供信息的数据驱动框架

IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Mohammed T. Zaki , Lewis S. Rowles , Jeff Hallowell , Kevin D. Orner
{"title":"利用新兴资源回收技术为农村农业地区畜禽粪便可持续管理提供信息的数据驱动框架","authors":"Mohammed T. Zaki ,&nbsp;Lewis S. Rowles ,&nbsp;Jeff Hallowell ,&nbsp;Kevin D. Orner","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Thermochemical conversion technologies are emerging as preferred resource recovery practices for managing animal manure in agricultural regions. Although the implementation of such technologies has been previously studied, difficulties exist in maintaining balance between high rate of resource recovery and low environmental, economic, and social impacts, particularly in rural regions with limited resources. We developed a data-driven framework by integrating machine learning with life cycle thinking that can be used as an open-source tool to help overcome these barriers. The framework was applied to compare two emerging technologies: pyrolysis versus hydrothermal carbonization for managing the excess poultry litter in a rural agricultural region. Among different machine learning models, random forest regression was the most successful to predict resource recovery of both technologies. Next, sustainability analysis indicated that the environmental (global warming), economic (annual worth), and social (system intrusiveness) impacts of pyrolysis was lower than hydrothermal carbonization. Finally, the framework revealed that implementation of pyrolysis at 600 °C for 1 h with the heating rate of 20 °C/min would result in the highest rate of resource recovery that corresponded to the lowest impacts. These results can be helpful in providing operational conditions for implementing emerging resource recovery technologies in rural agricultural regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100188"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000266/pdfft?md5=706adcd01d9925330cc12b6a785600be&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000266-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A data-driven framework to inform sustainable management of animal manure in rural agricultural regions using emerging resource recovery technologies\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed T. Zaki ,&nbsp;Lewis S. Rowles ,&nbsp;Jeff Hallowell ,&nbsp;Kevin D. Orner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Thermochemical conversion technologies are emerging as preferred resource recovery practices for managing animal manure in agricultural regions. Although the implementation of such technologies has been previously studied, difficulties exist in maintaining balance between high rate of resource recovery and low environmental, economic, and social impacts, particularly in rural regions with limited resources. We developed a data-driven framework by integrating machine learning with life cycle thinking that can be used as an open-source tool to help overcome these barriers. The framework was applied to compare two emerging technologies: pyrolysis versus hydrothermal carbonization for managing the excess poultry litter in a rural agricultural region. Among different machine learning models, random forest regression was the most successful to predict resource recovery of both technologies. Next, sustainability analysis indicated that the environmental (global warming), economic (annual worth), and social (system intrusiveness) impacts of pyrolysis was lower than hydrothermal carbonization. Finally, the framework revealed that implementation of pyrolysis at 600 °C for 1 h with the heating rate of 20 °C/min would result in the highest rate of resource recovery that corresponded to the lowest impacts. These results can be helpful in providing operational conditions for implementing emerging resource recovery technologies in rural agricultural regions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000266/pdfft?md5=706adcd01d9925330cc12b6a785600be&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000266-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

热化学转化技术正在成为农业地区管理动物粪便的首选资源回收方法。虽然以前对此类技术的实施进行过研究,但在保持高资源回收率与低环境、经济和社会影响之间的平衡方面仍存在困难,尤其是在资源有限的农村地区。我们将机器学习与生命周期思维相结合,开发了一个数据驱动框架,可作为开源工具帮助克服这些障碍。我们将该框架用于比较两种新兴技术:热解与热液碳化,以管理农村农业地区过剩的家禽粪便。在不同的机器学习模型中,随机森林回归法在预测两种技术的资源回收率方面最为成功。其次,可持续性分析表明,热解技术对环境(全球变暖)、经济(年产值)和社会(系统侵入性)的影响均低于水热碳化技术。最后,该框架显示,在 600 °C 下热解 1 小时,加热速度为 20 °C/min 时,资源回收率最高,影响最小。这些结果有助于为在农村农业地区实施新兴资源回收技术提供操作条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A data-driven framework to inform sustainable management of animal manure in rural agricultural regions using emerging resource recovery technologies

A data-driven framework to inform sustainable management of animal manure in rural agricultural regions using emerging resource recovery technologies

Thermochemical conversion technologies are emerging as preferred resource recovery practices for managing animal manure in agricultural regions. Although the implementation of such technologies has been previously studied, difficulties exist in maintaining balance between high rate of resource recovery and low environmental, economic, and social impacts, particularly in rural regions with limited resources. We developed a data-driven framework by integrating machine learning with life cycle thinking that can be used as an open-source tool to help overcome these barriers. The framework was applied to compare two emerging technologies: pyrolysis versus hydrothermal carbonization for managing the excess poultry litter in a rural agricultural region. Among different machine learning models, random forest regression was the most successful to predict resource recovery of both technologies. Next, sustainability analysis indicated that the environmental (global warming), economic (annual worth), and social (system intrusiveness) impacts of pyrolysis was lower than hydrothermal carbonization. Finally, the framework revealed that implementation of pyrolysis at 600 °C for 1 h with the heating rate of 20 °C/min would result in the highest rate of resource recovery that corresponded to the lowest impacts. These results can be helpful in providing operational conditions for implementing emerging resource recovery technologies in rural agricultural regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信