慢性上颌窦炎:骨学诊断法与 CT 诊断法的比较

IF 1.3 3区 地球科学 Q3 PALEONTOLOGY
Maia Casna, Sarah A. Schrader
{"title":"慢性上颌窦炎:骨学诊断法与 CT 诊断法的比较","authors":"Maia Casna,&nbsp;Sarah A. Schrader","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpp.2024.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the differences between endoscopic and radiological methods of analysis for diagnosing chronic maxillary sinusitis (CMS) in archaeological skeletal remains.</p></div><div><h3>Materials</h3><p>32 crania from a Dutch post-medieval rural population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We assessed the presence of bone changes indicative of CMS (i.e., bone growth and bone resorption) both endoscopically and through computed tomography (CT), and then compared results.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We observed moderate agreement between bone growth scores obtained through endoscopy and CT, and fair agreement when assessing bone resorption.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CMS prevalence rates observed through CT may be comparable to rates assessed endoscopically, although caution is needed when making direct comparisons.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>This is the first study comparing data obtained through endoscopy and radiological methods in the study of CMS, informing paleopathologists about potential biases in data comparison.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Our small sample size likely impacted results.</p></div><div><h3>Suggestions for further research</h3><p>Further research is advised to fully explore the comparability of endoscopic and radiological method of analysis in the study of sinusitis.</p></div><div><h3>Data Availability</h3><p>The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available upon request.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48817,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Paleopathology","volume":"45 ","pages":"Pages 30-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879981724001980/pdfft?md5=27f5c47c6913be9bce37225919f47263&pid=1-s2.0-S1879981724001980-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronic Maxillary Sinusitis: A comparison of osteological and CT methods of diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"Maia Casna,&nbsp;Sarah A. Schrader\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpp.2024.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the differences between endoscopic and radiological methods of analysis for diagnosing chronic maxillary sinusitis (CMS) in archaeological skeletal remains.</p></div><div><h3>Materials</h3><p>32 crania from a Dutch post-medieval rural population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We assessed the presence of bone changes indicative of CMS (i.e., bone growth and bone resorption) both endoscopically and through computed tomography (CT), and then compared results.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We observed moderate agreement between bone growth scores obtained through endoscopy and CT, and fair agreement when assessing bone resorption.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CMS prevalence rates observed through CT may be comparable to rates assessed endoscopically, although caution is needed when making direct comparisons.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>This is the first study comparing data obtained through endoscopy and radiological methods in the study of CMS, informing paleopathologists about potential biases in data comparison.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Our small sample size likely impacted results.</p></div><div><h3>Suggestions for further research</h3><p>Further research is advised to fully explore the comparability of endoscopic and radiological method of analysis in the study of sinusitis.</p></div><div><h3>Data Availability</h3><p>The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available upon request.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Paleopathology\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 30-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879981724001980/pdfft?md5=27f5c47c6913be9bce37225919f47263&pid=1-s2.0-S1879981724001980-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Paleopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879981724001980\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PALEONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Paleopathology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879981724001980","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估内窥镜和放射学分析方法在诊断考古骨骼遗骸中的慢性上颌窦炎(CMS)方面的差异、结果我们观察到内窥镜检查和计算机断层扫描(CT)获得的骨生长评分之间存在一定程度的一致性,而在评估骨吸收时,两者之间的一致性尚可。意义这是第一项比较通过内窥镜和放射学方法获得的 CMS 研究数据的研究,为古病理学家提供了数据比较中可能存在的偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chronic Maxillary Sinusitis: A comparison of osteological and CT methods of diagnosis

Objective

To assess the differences between endoscopic and radiological methods of analysis for diagnosing chronic maxillary sinusitis (CMS) in archaeological skeletal remains.

Materials

32 crania from a Dutch post-medieval rural population.

Methods

We assessed the presence of bone changes indicative of CMS (i.e., bone growth and bone resorption) both endoscopically and through computed tomography (CT), and then compared results.

Results

We observed moderate agreement between bone growth scores obtained through endoscopy and CT, and fair agreement when assessing bone resorption.

Conclusions

CMS prevalence rates observed through CT may be comparable to rates assessed endoscopically, although caution is needed when making direct comparisons.

Significance

This is the first study comparing data obtained through endoscopy and radiological methods in the study of CMS, informing paleopathologists about potential biases in data comparison.

Limitations

Our small sample size likely impacted results.

Suggestions for further research

Further research is advised to fully explore the comparability of endoscopic and radiological method of analysis in the study of sinusitis.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available upon request.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Paleopathology is the study and application of methods and techniques for investigating diseases and related conditions from skeletal and soft tissue remains. The International Journal of Paleopathology (IJPP) will publish original and significant articles on human and animal (including hominids) disease, based upon the study of physical remains, including osseous, dental, and preserved soft tissues at a range of methodological levels, from direct observation to molecular, chemical, histological and radiographic analysis. Discussion of ways in which these methods can be applied to the reconstruction of health, disease and life histories in the past is central to the discipline, so the journal would also encourage papers covering interpretive and theoretical issues, and those that place the study of disease at the centre of a bioarchaeological or biocultural approach. Papers dealing with historical evidence relating to disease in the past (rather than history of medicine) will also be published. The journal will also accept significant studies that applied previously developed techniques to new materials, setting the research in the context of current debates on past human and animal health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信