加利福尼亚州肉牛饲养场中可感知的边状无形体感染和临床无形体病病例的相关因素

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
SY Chen , L Forero , J Davy , J Stackhouse , D Harvey , E Abdelfattah , G Maier
{"title":"加利福尼亚州肉牛饲养场中可感知的边状无形体感染和临床无形体病病例的相关因素","authors":"SY Chen ,&nbsp;L Forero ,&nbsp;J Davy ,&nbsp;J Stackhouse ,&nbsp;D Harvey ,&nbsp;E Abdelfattah ,&nbsp;G Maier","doi":"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2024.102346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bovine anaplasmosis is a tick-borne disease caused by <em>Anaplasma marginale</em> in the United States. The objective of this study was to use a survey tool to generate information for beef operations in California on anaplasmosis prevention and control management, including to what extent management activities were informed by perceived herd-level exposure to <em>A. marginale</em> infection or occurrence of clinical anaplasmosis cases. We mailed 2,621 questionnaires with questions on <em>Anaplasma</em> status, herd demographics, anaplasmosis control and prevention measures, and environmental factors to beef ranchers in California in October 2020. Survey-weighted chi-square tests were used to compare management differences according to perceived <em>Anaplasma</em> infection status. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to analyze whether region of California, management practices, or environmental factors were associated with reported clinical cases of anaplasmosis in the previous five years. A total of 466 questionnaires describing 749 herds were obtained and used in this study. Use of management measures, including deliberate exposure of calves to ticks, vaccination for <em>Anaplasma</em>, infection control through antibiotics in feed, maintaining a completely closed herd, blood testing for <em>Anaplasma</em> on all herd additions, and taking no anaplasmosis control and prevention measures, were significantly different between herds with or without perceived <em>A. marginale</em> infection based on producers’ self-declared status. The overall perceived prevalence for <em>Anaplasma</em> infection and reported clinical cases of anaplasmosis at the herd level was 26.0 % (95 % CI: 24.3–27.7 %) and 17.1 % (95 % CI: 15.6–18.6 %) respectively, with the highest perceived infection and case numbers reported in the Central Coast region. In the GEE model, higher odds of reporting clinical cases of anaplasmosis in the previous five years were observed in cattle located in the Central Coast region, cattle within a large herd, cattle that are treated with tick/fly control, cattle in a completely closed herd, and cattle receiving <em>Anaplasma</em> vaccine. <em>Anaplasma</em> infection and bovine anaplasmosis status may be underestimated in beef herds in California based on previous study results. Changing needles between cattle after injections and conducting blood testing for <em>Anaplasma</em> on herd additions are important <em>Anaplasma</em> management measures that are infrequently implemented in beef herds in California. The results show a need for producer education to improve producers’ awareness of bovine anaplasmosis and implement proper measures for disease control and prevention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49320,"journal":{"name":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","volume":"15 4","pages":"Article 102346"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X24000396/pdfft?md5=714a0a474141c27962d19479b0d03f46&pid=1-s2.0-S1877959X24000396-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with perceived Anaplasma marginale infection and clinical anaplasmosis cases on beef operations in California\",\"authors\":\"SY Chen ,&nbsp;L Forero ,&nbsp;J Davy ,&nbsp;J Stackhouse ,&nbsp;D Harvey ,&nbsp;E Abdelfattah ,&nbsp;G Maier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2024.102346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Bovine anaplasmosis is a tick-borne disease caused by <em>Anaplasma marginale</em> in the United States. The objective of this study was to use a survey tool to generate information for beef operations in California on anaplasmosis prevention and control management, including to what extent management activities were informed by perceived herd-level exposure to <em>A. marginale</em> infection or occurrence of clinical anaplasmosis cases. We mailed 2,621 questionnaires with questions on <em>Anaplasma</em> status, herd demographics, anaplasmosis control and prevention measures, and environmental factors to beef ranchers in California in October 2020. Survey-weighted chi-square tests were used to compare management differences according to perceived <em>Anaplasma</em> infection status. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to analyze whether region of California, management practices, or environmental factors were associated with reported clinical cases of anaplasmosis in the previous five years. A total of 466 questionnaires describing 749 herds were obtained and used in this study. Use of management measures, including deliberate exposure of calves to ticks, vaccination for <em>Anaplasma</em>, infection control through antibiotics in feed, maintaining a completely closed herd, blood testing for <em>Anaplasma</em> on all herd additions, and taking no anaplasmosis control and prevention measures, were significantly different between herds with or without perceived <em>A. marginale</em> infection based on producers’ self-declared status. The overall perceived prevalence for <em>Anaplasma</em> infection and reported clinical cases of anaplasmosis at the herd level was 26.0 % (95 % CI: 24.3–27.7 %) and 17.1 % (95 % CI: 15.6–18.6 %) respectively, with the highest perceived infection and case numbers reported in the Central Coast region. In the GEE model, higher odds of reporting clinical cases of anaplasmosis in the previous five years were observed in cattle located in the Central Coast region, cattle within a large herd, cattle that are treated with tick/fly control, cattle in a completely closed herd, and cattle receiving <em>Anaplasma</em> vaccine. <em>Anaplasma</em> infection and bovine anaplasmosis status may be underestimated in beef herds in California based on previous study results. Changing needles between cattle after injections and conducting blood testing for <em>Anaplasma</em> on herd additions are important <em>Anaplasma</em> management measures that are infrequently implemented in beef herds in California. The results show a need for producer education to improve producers’ awareness of bovine anaplasmosis and implement proper measures for disease control and prevention.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 102346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X24000396/pdfft?md5=714a0a474141c27962d19479b0d03f46&pid=1-s2.0-S1877959X24000396-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X24000396\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X24000396","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,牛无形体病是一种由边缘无形体(Anaplasma marginale)引起的蜱媒疾病。这项研究的目的是利用调查工具为加利福尼亚州的牛肉饲养场提供有关无形体病防治管理的信息,包括管理活动在多大程度上受牛群感染边鞭毛虫或发生临床无形体病病例的影响。2020 年 10 月,我们向加利福尼亚州的肉牛牧场主邮寄了 2,621 份调查问卷,其中包含有关无形体病状况、牛群人口统计学、无形体病防控措施和环境因素的问题。采用调查加权卡方检验比较不同阿纳疟原虫感染状况下的管理差异。使用广义估计方程 (GEE) 分析加利福尼亚地区、管理方法或环境因素是否与前五年报告的无形体病临床病例有关。本研究共收到 466 份调查问卷,涉及 749 个畜群。根据生产者的自我声明,使用管理措施(包括故意将犊牛暴露于蜱虫、接种弓形虫疫苗、通过饲料中的抗生素控制感染、维持完全封闭的牛群、对所有新增牛群进行弓形虫血液检测以及不采取任何弓形虫病防控措施)的情况在有无弓形虫感染的牛群之间存在显著差异。牛群感染弓形虫的总体感知流行率和报告的弓形虫病临床病例数分别为 26.0 %(95 % CI:24.3-27.7 %)和 17.1 %(95 % CI:15.6-18.6 %),中央海岸地区的感知感染率和病例数最高。在 GEE 模型中,观察到中央海岸地区的牛、大型牛群中的牛、接受过蜱/蝇控制治疗的牛、完全封闭牛群中的牛、接种过阿那普拉斯菌疫苗的牛在过去五年中报告临床阿那普拉斯菌病例的几率更高。根据以前的研究结果,加利福尼亚州肉牛群中的阿纳疟原虫感染和牛无形体病状况可能被低估了。注射后更换牛之间的针头以及对牛群中新增的牛进行阿那普拉斯原虫血液检测是重要的阿那普拉斯原虫管理措施,但在加利福尼亚州的肉牛群中却很少实施。研究结果表明,有必要开展生产者教育,以提高生产者对牛无形体病的认识,并采取适当的疾病防控措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors associated with perceived Anaplasma marginale infection and clinical anaplasmosis cases on beef operations in California

Bovine anaplasmosis is a tick-borne disease caused by Anaplasma marginale in the United States. The objective of this study was to use a survey tool to generate information for beef operations in California on anaplasmosis prevention and control management, including to what extent management activities were informed by perceived herd-level exposure to A. marginale infection or occurrence of clinical anaplasmosis cases. We mailed 2,621 questionnaires with questions on Anaplasma status, herd demographics, anaplasmosis control and prevention measures, and environmental factors to beef ranchers in California in October 2020. Survey-weighted chi-square tests were used to compare management differences according to perceived Anaplasma infection status. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to analyze whether region of California, management practices, or environmental factors were associated with reported clinical cases of anaplasmosis in the previous five years. A total of 466 questionnaires describing 749 herds were obtained and used in this study. Use of management measures, including deliberate exposure of calves to ticks, vaccination for Anaplasma, infection control through antibiotics in feed, maintaining a completely closed herd, blood testing for Anaplasma on all herd additions, and taking no anaplasmosis control and prevention measures, were significantly different between herds with or without perceived A. marginale infection based on producers’ self-declared status. The overall perceived prevalence for Anaplasma infection and reported clinical cases of anaplasmosis at the herd level was 26.0 % (95 % CI: 24.3–27.7 %) and 17.1 % (95 % CI: 15.6–18.6 %) respectively, with the highest perceived infection and case numbers reported in the Central Coast region. In the GEE model, higher odds of reporting clinical cases of anaplasmosis in the previous five years were observed in cattle located in the Central Coast region, cattle within a large herd, cattle that are treated with tick/fly control, cattle in a completely closed herd, and cattle receiving Anaplasma vaccine. Anaplasma infection and bovine anaplasmosis status may be underestimated in beef herds in California based on previous study results. Changing needles between cattle after injections and conducting blood testing for Anaplasma on herd additions are important Anaplasma management measures that are infrequently implemented in beef herds in California. The results show a need for producer education to improve producers’ awareness of bovine anaplasmosis and implement proper measures for disease control and prevention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases INFECTIOUS DISEASES-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original research papers, short communications, state-of-the-art mini-reviews, letters to the editor, clinical-case studies, announcements of pertinent international meetings, and editorials. The journal covers a broad spectrum and brings together various disciplines, for example, zoology, microbiology, molecular biology, genetics, mathematical modelling, veterinary and human medicine. Multidisciplinary approaches and the use of conventional and novel methods/methodologies (in the field and in the laboratory) are crucial for deeper understanding of the natural processes and human behaviour/activities that result in human or animal diseases and in economic effects of ticks and tick-borne pathogens. Such understanding is essential for management of tick populations and tick-borne diseases in an effective and environmentally acceptable manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信