在主动脉瓣环较小的患者中,自扩张瓣膜比球囊扩张瓣膜更有益

IF 41.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Karina Huynh
{"title":"在主动脉瓣环较小的患者中,自扩张瓣膜比球囊扩张瓣膜更有益","authors":"Karina Huynh","doi":"10.1038/s41569-024-01027-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis and a small aortic annulus, a self-expanding valve has similar rates of clinical outcomes at 1 year and lower rates of bioprosthetic dysfunction compared with a balloon-expandable valve.","PeriodicalId":18976,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":41.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-expanding valves more beneficial than balloon-expandable valves in patients with a small aortic annulus\",\"authors\":\"Karina Huynh\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41569-024-01027-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis and a small aortic annulus, a self-expanding valve has similar rates of clinical outcomes at 1 year and lower rates of bioprosthetic dysfunction compared with a balloon-expandable valve.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":41.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-024-01027-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-024-01027-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于有症状的主动脉瓣狭窄和主动脉瓣环较小的患者,与球囊扩张瓣膜相比,自扩张瓣膜的 1 年临床疗效相似,生物假体功能障碍发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Self-expanding valves more beneficial than balloon-expandable valves in patients with a small aortic annulus

Self-expanding valves more beneficial than balloon-expandable valves in patients with a small aortic annulus
In patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis and a small aortic annulus, a self-expanding valve has similar rates of clinical outcomes at 1 year and lower rates of bioprosthetic dysfunction compared with a balloon-expandable valve.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Cardiology
Nature Reviews Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
53.10
自引率
0.60%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Cardiology aims to be the go-to source for reviews and commentaries in the scientific and clinical communities it serves. Focused on providing authoritative and accessible articles enriched with clear figures and tables, the journal strives to offer unparalleled service to authors, referees, and readers, maximizing the usefulness and impact of each publication. It covers a broad range of content types, including Research Highlights, Comments, News & Views, Reviews, Consensus Statements, and Perspectives, catering to practising cardiologists and cardiovascular research scientists. Authored by renowned clinicians, academics, and researchers, the content targets readers in the biological and medical sciences, ensuring accessibility across various disciplines. In-depth Reviews offer up-to-date information, while Consensus Statements provide evidence-based recommendations. Perspectives and News & Views present topical discussions and opinions, and the Research Highlights section filters primary research from cardiovascular and general medical journals. As part of the Nature Reviews portfolio, Nature Reviews Cardiology maintains high standards and a wide reach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信