Rachel M. Prosser , James P. Dennis , Paul M. Salkovskis
{"title":"了解囤积症的成见:系统回顾","authors":"Rachel M. Prosser , James P. Dennis , Paul M. Salkovskis","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The degree to which hoarding disorder (HD) is stigmatised by the public, and that this is internalised by people with HD, is a relatively neglected research area. This review aimed to synthesise current understanding of stigma of HD and its impact on help-seeking. A systematic search was conducted to identify publications which investigated public or internalised stigma, or related concepts like shame and blame, in relation to HD. The electronic databases PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched. Fifteen papers met inclusion criteria and were appraised for quality using the QualSyst tool. There is very little literature exploring stigma in HD and quality of research is variable. Nevertheless, the literature suggests that a significant proportion of people who hoard and their families experience stigma, and HD is stigmatised by the public and associated with more rejecting attitudes and frustration amongst professionals. Finally, research exploring the impact of stigma on help-seeking in HD tentatively suggested a negative impact of stigma. Further research is needed to replicate and extend findings and address methodological limitations to provide an understanding of stigma on which approaches to enhance wellbeing and treatment uptake in HD can be developed. Systematic review (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42022375820.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100872"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000162/pdfft?md5=90f2c225078f191ea0ee77296516918d&pid=1-s2.0-S2211364924000162-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding stigma in hoarding disorder: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Rachel M. Prosser , James P. Dennis , Paul M. Salkovskis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The degree to which hoarding disorder (HD) is stigmatised by the public, and that this is internalised by people with HD, is a relatively neglected research area. This review aimed to synthesise current understanding of stigma of HD and its impact on help-seeking. A systematic search was conducted to identify publications which investigated public or internalised stigma, or related concepts like shame and blame, in relation to HD. The electronic databases PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched. Fifteen papers met inclusion criteria and were appraised for quality using the QualSyst tool. There is very little literature exploring stigma in HD and quality of research is variable. Nevertheless, the literature suggests that a significant proportion of people who hoard and their families experience stigma, and HD is stigmatised by the public and associated with more rejecting attitudes and frustration amongst professionals. Finally, research exploring the impact of stigma on help-seeking in HD tentatively suggested a negative impact of stigma. Further research is needed to replicate and extend findings and address methodological limitations to provide an understanding of stigma on which approaches to enhance wellbeing and treatment uptake in HD can be developed. Systematic review (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42022375820.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100872\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000162/pdfft?md5=90f2c225078f191ea0ee77296516918d&pid=1-s2.0-S2211364924000162-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000162\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
囤积症(HD)在多大程度上被公众所鄙视,以及囤积症患者对鄙视的内化程度,是一个相对被忽视的研究领域。本综述旨在综合目前对囤积症耻辱化及其对求助影响的理解。我们进行了系统性搜索,以确定与 HD 有关的调查公众或内化成见或相关概念(如羞耻和自责)的出版物。检索的电子数据库包括 PsycINFO、PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Medline、CINAHL 和 Web of Science。有 15 篇论文符合纳入标准,并使用 QualSyst 工具进行了质量评估。探讨 HD 耻辱感的文献很少,研究质量也参差不齐。尽管如此,文献表明,很大一部分囤积癖患者及其家人都经历过污名化,HD 遭到了公众的污名化,并与专业人士的排斥态度和挫败感联系在一起。最后,探讨污名化对 HD 求助影响的研究初步表明,污名化具有负面影响。需要进一步开展研究,以复制和扩展研究结果,并解决方法上的局限性,从而提供对污名化的理解,并在此基础上制定方法,提高 HD 患者的福祉和治疗接受率。系统综述(PROSPERO)注册号:CRD42022375820。
Understanding stigma in hoarding disorder: A systematic review
The degree to which hoarding disorder (HD) is stigmatised by the public, and that this is internalised by people with HD, is a relatively neglected research area. This review aimed to synthesise current understanding of stigma of HD and its impact on help-seeking. A systematic search was conducted to identify publications which investigated public or internalised stigma, or related concepts like shame and blame, in relation to HD. The electronic databases PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched. Fifteen papers met inclusion criteria and were appraised for quality using the QualSyst tool. There is very little literature exploring stigma in HD and quality of research is variable. Nevertheless, the literature suggests that a significant proportion of people who hoard and their families experience stigma, and HD is stigmatised by the public and associated with more rejecting attitudes and frustration amongst professionals. Finally, research exploring the impact of stigma on help-seeking in HD tentatively suggested a negative impact of stigma. Further research is needed to replicate and extend findings and address methodological limitations to provide an understanding of stigma on which approaches to enhance wellbeing and treatment uptake in HD can be developed. Systematic review (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42022375820.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders (JOCRD) is an international journal that publishes high quality research and clinically-oriented articles dealing with all aspects of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and related conditions (OC spectrum disorders; e.g., trichotillomania, hoarding, body dysmorphic disorder). The journal invites studies of clinical and non-clinical (i.e., student) samples of all age groups from the fields of psychiatry, psychology, neuroscience, and other medical and health sciences. The journal''s broad focus encompasses classification, assessment, psychological and psychiatric treatment, prevention, psychopathology, neurobiology and genetics. Clinical reports (descriptions of innovative treatment methods) and book reviews on all aspects of OCD-related disorders will be considered, as will theoretical and review articles that make valuable contributions.
Suitable topics for manuscripts include:
-The boundaries of OCD and relationships with OC spectrum disorders
-Validation of assessments of obsessive-compulsive and related phenomena
-OCD symptoms in diverse social and cultural contexts
-Studies of neurobiological and genetic factors in OCD and related conditions
-Experimental and descriptive psychopathology and epidemiological studies
-Studies on relationships among cognitive and behavioral variables in OCD and related disorders
-Interpersonal aspects of OCD and related disorders
-Evaluation of psychological and psychiatric treatment and prevention programs, and predictors of outcome.