评估植物群落对气候变暖反应的纯存在数据的可靠性

IF 5.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Ecography Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1111/ecog.07213
L. Camila Pacheco-Riaño, Sabine Rumpf, Tuija Maliniemi, Suzette G. A. Flantua, John-Arvid Grytnes
{"title":"评估植物群落对气候变暖反应的纯存在数据的可靠性","authors":"L. Camila Pacheco-Riaño,&nbsp;Sabine Rumpf,&nbsp;Tuija Maliniemi,&nbsp;Suzette G. A. Flantua,&nbsp;John-Arvid Grytnes","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Climate warming has triggered shifts in plant distributions, resulting in changes within communities, characterized by an increase in warm-demanding species and a decrease in cold-adapted species – referred to as thermophilization. Researchers conventionally rely on co-occurrence data from vegetation assemblages to examine these community dynamics. Despite the increasing availability of presence-only data in recent decades, their potential has largely remained unexplored due to concerns about their reliability. Our study aimed to determine whether climate-induced changes in community dynamics, as inferred from presence-only data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), corresponded with those derived from co-occurrence plot data. To assess the differences between these datasets, we computed a community temperature index (CTI) using a transfer function, weighted-averaging partial least squares regression (WA-PLS). We calibrated the transfect function model based on the species–temperature relationship using data before recent climate warming. Then we assessed the differences in CTI and examined the temporal trend in thermophilization. In a preliminary analysis, we assessed the performance of this calibration using three datasets: 1) Norwegian co-occurrence data, 2) presence-only data from a broader European region organized into pseudo-plots (potentially capturing a larger part of the species niches), and 3) a combined dataset merging 1) and 2). The transfer function including the combined dataset performed best. Subsequently, we compared the CTI for the co-occurrence plots paired up spatially and temporally with presence-only pseudo-plots. The results demonstrated that presence-only data can effectively evaluate species assemblage responses to climate warming, with consistent CTI and thermophilization values to what was found for the co-occurrence data. Employing presence-only data for evaluating community responses opens up better spatial and temporal resolution and much more detailed analyses of such responses. Our results therefore outline how a large amount of presence-only data can be used to enhance our understanding of community dynamics in a warmer world.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2024 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecog.07213","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of presence-only data for assessing plant community responses to climate warming\",\"authors\":\"L. Camila Pacheco-Riaño,&nbsp;Sabine Rumpf,&nbsp;Tuija Maliniemi,&nbsp;Suzette G. A. Flantua,&nbsp;John-Arvid Grytnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecog.07213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Climate warming has triggered shifts in plant distributions, resulting in changes within communities, characterized by an increase in warm-demanding species and a decrease in cold-adapted species – referred to as thermophilization. Researchers conventionally rely on co-occurrence data from vegetation assemblages to examine these community dynamics. Despite the increasing availability of presence-only data in recent decades, their potential has largely remained unexplored due to concerns about their reliability. Our study aimed to determine whether climate-induced changes in community dynamics, as inferred from presence-only data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), corresponded with those derived from co-occurrence plot data. To assess the differences between these datasets, we computed a community temperature index (CTI) using a transfer function, weighted-averaging partial least squares regression (WA-PLS). We calibrated the transfect function model based on the species–temperature relationship using data before recent climate warming. Then we assessed the differences in CTI and examined the temporal trend in thermophilization. In a preliminary analysis, we assessed the performance of this calibration using three datasets: 1) Norwegian co-occurrence data, 2) presence-only data from a broader European region organized into pseudo-plots (potentially capturing a larger part of the species niches), and 3) a combined dataset merging 1) and 2). The transfer function including the combined dataset performed best. Subsequently, we compared the CTI for the co-occurrence plots paired up spatially and temporally with presence-only pseudo-plots. The results demonstrated that presence-only data can effectively evaluate species assemblage responses to climate warming, with consistent CTI and thermophilization values to what was found for the co-occurrence data. Employing presence-only data for evaluating community responses opens up better spatial and temporal resolution and much more detailed analyses of such responses. Our results therefore outline how a large amount of presence-only data can be used to enhance our understanding of community dynamics in a warmer world.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecography\",\"volume\":\"2024 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecog.07213\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.07213\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.07213","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候变暖引发了植物分布的变化,导致群落内部发生变化,其特点是需要温暖的物种增加,适应寒冷的物种减少--这被称为嗜热化。研究人员通常依靠植被组合的共生数据来研究这些群落动态。尽管近几十年来仅存在数据的可用性不断提高,但由于对其可靠性的担忧,这些数据的潜力在很大程度上仍未得到开发。我们的研究旨在确定,从全球生物多样性信息机制(GBIF)的纯存在数据推断出的群落动态变化是否与共生小区数据得出的群落动态变化一致。为了评估这些数据集之间的差异,我们使用转移函数、加权平均偏最小二乘回归(WA-PLS)计算了群落温度指数(CTI)。我们利用近期气候变暖前的数据,根据物种与温度的关系校准了转座函数模型。然后,我们评估了 CTI 的差异,并研究了嗜热的时间趋势。在初步分析中,我们利用三个数据集评估了这一校准的性能:1)挪威的共现数据;2)来自更广泛的欧洲地区的只存在数据,这些数据被整理成伪图谱(有可能捕捉到更大一部分的物种壁龛);3)合并了1)和2)的综合数据集。包括综合数据集在内的转移函数表现最佳。随后,我们比较了在空间和时间上与纯存在伪图谱配对的共生图谱的 CTI。结果表明,纯存在数据可以有效评估物种集群对气候变暖的反应,其 CTI 和嗜热值与共生数据一致。利用纯存在数据评估群落响应可以提高空间和时间分辨率,并对此类响应进行更详细的分析。因此,我们的研究结果概述了如何利用大量纯存在数据来加深我们对变暖世界中群落动态的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reliability of presence-only data for assessing plant community responses to climate warming

Reliability of presence-only data for assessing plant community responses to climate warming

Climate warming has triggered shifts in plant distributions, resulting in changes within communities, characterized by an increase in warm-demanding species and a decrease in cold-adapted species – referred to as thermophilization. Researchers conventionally rely on co-occurrence data from vegetation assemblages to examine these community dynamics. Despite the increasing availability of presence-only data in recent decades, their potential has largely remained unexplored due to concerns about their reliability. Our study aimed to determine whether climate-induced changes in community dynamics, as inferred from presence-only data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), corresponded with those derived from co-occurrence plot data. To assess the differences between these datasets, we computed a community temperature index (CTI) using a transfer function, weighted-averaging partial least squares regression (WA-PLS). We calibrated the transfect function model based on the species–temperature relationship using data before recent climate warming. Then we assessed the differences in CTI and examined the temporal trend in thermophilization. In a preliminary analysis, we assessed the performance of this calibration using three datasets: 1) Norwegian co-occurrence data, 2) presence-only data from a broader European region organized into pseudo-plots (potentially capturing a larger part of the species niches), and 3) a combined dataset merging 1) and 2). The transfer function including the combined dataset performed best. Subsequently, we compared the CTI for the co-occurrence plots paired up spatially and temporally with presence-only pseudo-plots. The results demonstrated that presence-only data can effectively evaluate species assemblage responses to climate warming, with consistent CTI and thermophilization values to what was found for the co-occurrence data. Employing presence-only data for evaluating community responses opens up better spatial and temporal resolution and much more detailed analyses of such responses. Our results therefore outline how a large amount of presence-only data can be used to enhance our understanding of community dynamics in a warmer world.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信