通过直接大血管穿刺进行尸检对比增强计算机断层扫描

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Shogo Shimbashi , Akiko Takeuchi , Motoo Yoshimiya , Shigeki Jin , Kotaro Matoba , Hideki Hyodoh
{"title":"通过直接大血管穿刺进行尸检对比增强计算机断层扫描","authors":"Shogo Shimbashi ,&nbsp;Akiko Takeuchi ,&nbsp;Motoo Yoshimiya ,&nbsp;Shigeki Jin ,&nbsp;Kotaro Matoba ,&nbsp;Hideki Hyodoh","doi":"10.1016/j.legalmed.2024.102448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of postmortem contrast-enhanced CT (PMeCT) performed via direct large-vessel puncture when routine postmortem CT suggests a vascular lesion as the cause of death. PMeCT was performed in 9 cases (4 male, 5 female) with a mean age of 76 years (range 52–92) at the time of death. The mean time elapsed since death was 29.1 h (12.0–72.0). The location of the target vessel for puncture was determined based on the CT table position and a grid placed on the body surface. An 18-G spinal needle was advanced to the puncture site, and the needle tip was confirmed to have reached the intended blood vessel. Using negative pressure with a 20-ml syringe, the needle tip was advanced until reverse bleeding was confirmed. Diluted contrast medium was injected slowly to ensure its dispersion within the blood vessels. Following confirmation of no extravasation, additional doses of diluted contrast agent were injected in 3–4 divided doses, with CT scans obtained at each step to track the distribution of contrast agent over time. PMeCT was successful in all cases, revealing cardiac tamponade in 7 (ascending aortic dissection, n = 6; cardiac rupture, n = 1), thoracic aortic aneurysm rupture, n = 1, and iliac artery aneurysm rupture, n = 1. There were no cases of procedure-related extravasation (pseudo-lesions). When postmortem CT reveals pericardial hematoma or bleeding in the thoracic or abdominal cavity, PMeCT can identify the source of bleeding.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49913,"journal":{"name":"Legal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postmortem contrast-enhanced computed tomography via direct large-vessel puncture\",\"authors\":\"Shogo Shimbashi ,&nbsp;Akiko Takeuchi ,&nbsp;Motoo Yoshimiya ,&nbsp;Shigeki Jin ,&nbsp;Kotaro Matoba ,&nbsp;Hideki Hyodoh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.legalmed.2024.102448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of postmortem contrast-enhanced CT (PMeCT) performed via direct large-vessel puncture when routine postmortem CT suggests a vascular lesion as the cause of death. PMeCT was performed in 9 cases (4 male, 5 female) with a mean age of 76 years (range 52–92) at the time of death. The mean time elapsed since death was 29.1 h (12.0–72.0). The location of the target vessel for puncture was determined based on the CT table position and a grid placed on the body surface. An 18-G spinal needle was advanced to the puncture site, and the needle tip was confirmed to have reached the intended blood vessel. Using negative pressure with a 20-ml syringe, the needle tip was advanced until reverse bleeding was confirmed. Diluted contrast medium was injected slowly to ensure its dispersion within the blood vessels. Following confirmation of no extravasation, additional doses of diluted contrast agent were injected in 3–4 divided doses, with CT scans obtained at each step to track the distribution of contrast agent over time. PMeCT was successful in all cases, revealing cardiac tamponade in 7 (ascending aortic dissection, n = 6; cardiac rupture, n = 1), thoracic aortic aneurysm rupture, n = 1, and iliac artery aneurysm rupture, n = 1. There were no cases of procedure-related extravasation (pseudo-lesions). When postmortem CT reveals pericardial hematoma or bleeding in the thoracic or abdominal cavity, PMeCT can identify the source of bleeding.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622324000580\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622324000580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估当常规死后 CT 提示死因是血管病变时,通过直接大血管穿刺进行死后对比增强 CT(PMeCT)的实用性。9例患者(4男5女)死亡时的平均年龄为76岁(52-92岁不等)。平均死亡时间为 29.1 小时(12.0-72.0)。穿刺目标血管的位置是根据 CT 台位置和体表网格确定的。将 18 G 的脊髓穿刺针推进到穿刺部位,确认针尖已到达目标血管。使用 20 毫升注射器负压推进针尖,直至确认反向出血。缓慢注入稀释的造影剂,以确保其在血管内分散。在确认没有外渗后,再分 3-4 次注入更多剂量的稀释造影剂,每一步都要进行 CT 扫描,以追踪造影剂在一段时间内的分布情况。所有病例的 PMeCT 均获得成功,其中 7 例发现心脏填塞(升主动脉夹层,6 例;心脏破裂,1 例),胸主动脉瘤破裂,1 例,髂动脉瘤破裂,1 例。没有发生与手术相关的外渗(假性出血)病例。当尸检 CT 发现心包血肿或胸腔或腹腔出血时,PMeCT 可以确定出血来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postmortem contrast-enhanced computed tomography via direct large-vessel puncture

The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of postmortem contrast-enhanced CT (PMeCT) performed via direct large-vessel puncture when routine postmortem CT suggests a vascular lesion as the cause of death. PMeCT was performed in 9 cases (4 male, 5 female) with a mean age of 76 years (range 52–92) at the time of death. The mean time elapsed since death was 29.1 h (12.0–72.0). The location of the target vessel for puncture was determined based on the CT table position and a grid placed on the body surface. An 18-G spinal needle was advanced to the puncture site, and the needle tip was confirmed to have reached the intended blood vessel. Using negative pressure with a 20-ml syringe, the needle tip was advanced until reverse bleeding was confirmed. Diluted contrast medium was injected slowly to ensure its dispersion within the blood vessels. Following confirmation of no extravasation, additional doses of diluted contrast agent were injected in 3–4 divided doses, with CT scans obtained at each step to track the distribution of contrast agent over time. PMeCT was successful in all cases, revealing cardiac tamponade in 7 (ascending aortic dissection, n = 6; cardiac rupture, n = 1), thoracic aortic aneurysm rupture, n = 1, and iliac artery aneurysm rupture, n = 1. There were no cases of procedure-related extravasation (pseudo-lesions). When postmortem CT reveals pericardial hematoma or bleeding in the thoracic or abdominal cavity, PMeCT can identify the source of bleeding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Legal Medicine
Legal Medicine Nursing-Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Legal Medicine provides an international forum for the publication of original articles, reviews and correspondence on subjects that cover practical and theoretical areas of interest relating to the wide range of legal medicine. Subjects covered include forensic pathology, toxicology, odontology, anthropology, criminalistics, immunochemistry, hemogenetics and forensic aspects of biological science with emphasis on DNA analysis and molecular biology. Submissions dealing with medicolegal problems such as malpractice, insurance, child abuse or ethics in medical practice are also acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信