手提箱炸弹中简易爆炸装置部件、手提箱、箱内物品和行李箱的生存能力

Q3 Medicine
Erwin Vermeij
{"title":"手提箱炸弹中简易爆炸装置部件、手提箱、箱内物品和行李箱的生存能力","authors":"Erwin Vermeij","doi":"10.1016/j.fsir.2024.100366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One of the most striking attacks on a commercial passenger airliner was the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 (PA103) on 21 December 1988. Shortly after departure, the Boeing 747 “Clipper Maid of the Seas” broke apart over the Scottish town of Lockerbie. All 259 passengers and crew were killed, along with 11 residents of Lockerbie. The bombing of flight PA103 is still subject to controversy. The origin of a crucial piece of evidence, a fragment of circuit board, is highly questioned. One of the reasons for this ongoing controversy is probably that circumstantial evidence, that led to the conviction of a Libyan, is not supported by other evidence. Almost nothing is published in the forensic literature regarding the survivability of components that make up an improvised explosive device (IED). To gain insight into the survivability of IED components, suitcases, their contents, and luggage containers, a series of controlled experiments were carried out in which suitcase bombs, positioned in different configurations in aluminium LD3 luggage containers, were detonated. From the results, it could be seen that the major part of the suitcases, their contents and the LD3 containers survived the explosion. Also, almost all components of the IED itself survived the explosion to a greater or lesser extent.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36331,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International: Reports","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266591072400015X/pdfft?md5=befb44245fed0c54796a37f8ae594fa1&pid=1-s2.0-S266591072400015X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survivability of IED components, suitcases, their contents and luggage containers in suitcase bombs\",\"authors\":\"Erwin Vermeij\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fsir.2024.100366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>One of the most striking attacks on a commercial passenger airliner was the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 (PA103) on 21 December 1988. Shortly after departure, the Boeing 747 “Clipper Maid of the Seas” broke apart over the Scottish town of Lockerbie. All 259 passengers and crew were killed, along with 11 residents of Lockerbie. The bombing of flight PA103 is still subject to controversy. The origin of a crucial piece of evidence, a fragment of circuit board, is highly questioned. One of the reasons for this ongoing controversy is probably that circumstantial evidence, that led to the conviction of a Libyan, is not supported by other evidence. Almost nothing is published in the forensic literature regarding the survivability of components that make up an improvised explosive device (IED). To gain insight into the survivability of IED components, suitcases, their contents, and luggage containers, a series of controlled experiments were carried out in which suitcase bombs, positioned in different configurations in aluminium LD3 luggage containers, were detonated. From the results, it could be seen that the major part of the suitcases, their contents and the LD3 containers survived the explosion. Also, almost all components of the IED itself survived the explosion to a greater or lesser extent.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Science International: Reports\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266591072400015X/pdfft?md5=befb44245fed0c54796a37f8ae594fa1&pid=1-s2.0-S266591072400015X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Science International: Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266591072400015X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International: Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266591072400015X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1988 年 12 月 21 日泛美航空公司 103 号航班(PA103)爆炸事件是对商业客机最引人注目的袭击之一。起飞后不久,这架波音 747 "Clipper Maid of the Seas "客机在苏格兰小镇洛克比上空解体。259 名乘客和机组人员全部遇难,还有 11 名洛克比居民。PA103 号航班被炸至今仍存在争议。一个关键证据--一块电路板碎片--的来源备受质疑。争议持续不断的原因之一可能是,导致一名利比亚人被定罪的间接证据没有得到其他证据的支持。法医文献中几乎没有关于简易爆炸装置(IED)部件存活性的内容。为了深入了解简易爆炸装置组件、手提箱、箱内物品和行李箱的存活能力,我们进行了一系列受控实验,将手提箱炸弹以不同配置放置在 LD3 铝制行李箱中引爆。实验结果表明,手提箱、箱内物品和 LD3 行李箱的大部分在爆炸中幸存下来。此外,简易爆炸装置本身的几乎所有部件都或多或少地在爆炸中幸存下来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survivability of IED components, suitcases, their contents and luggage containers in suitcase bombs

One of the most striking attacks on a commercial passenger airliner was the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 (PA103) on 21 December 1988. Shortly after departure, the Boeing 747 “Clipper Maid of the Seas” broke apart over the Scottish town of Lockerbie. All 259 passengers and crew were killed, along with 11 residents of Lockerbie. The bombing of flight PA103 is still subject to controversy. The origin of a crucial piece of evidence, a fragment of circuit board, is highly questioned. One of the reasons for this ongoing controversy is probably that circumstantial evidence, that led to the conviction of a Libyan, is not supported by other evidence. Almost nothing is published in the forensic literature regarding the survivability of components that make up an improvised explosive device (IED). To gain insight into the survivability of IED components, suitcases, their contents, and luggage containers, a series of controlled experiments were carried out in which suitcase bombs, positioned in different configurations in aluminium LD3 luggage containers, were detonated. From the results, it could be seen that the major part of the suitcases, their contents and the LD3 containers survived the explosion. Also, almost all components of the IED itself survived the explosion to a greater or lesser extent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Science International: Reports
Forensic Science International: Reports Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信