{"title":"金融交易中的推荐系统:在可解释的人工智能投资框架中使用基于机器的信念分析","authors":"Alicia Vidler","doi":"arxiv-2404.11080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, assets are selected for inclusion in a portfolio (long or\nshort) by human analysts. Teams of human portfolio managers (PMs) seek to weigh\nand balance these securities using optimisation methods and other portfolio\nconstruction processes. Often, human PMs consider human analyst recommendations\nagainst the backdrop of the analyst's recommendation track record and the\napplicability of the analyst to the recommendation they provide. Many firms\nregularly ask analysts to provide a \"conviction\" level on their\nrecommendations. In the eyes of PMs, understanding a human analyst's track\nrecord has typically come down to basic spread sheet tabulation or, at best, a\n\"virtual portfolio\" paper trading book to keep track of results of\nrecommendations. Analysts' conviction around their recommendations and their \"paper trading\"\ntrack record are two crucial workflow components between analysts and portfolio\nconstruction. Many human PMs may not even appreciate that they factor these\ndata points into their decision-making logic. This chapter explores how\nArtificial Intelligence (AI) can be used to replicate these two steps and\nbridge the gap between AI data analytics and AI-based portfolio construction\nmethods. This field of AI is referred to as Recommender Systems (RS). This\nchapter will further explore what metadata that RS systems functionally supply\nto downstream systems and their features.","PeriodicalId":501045,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Portfolio Management","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommender Systems in Financial Trading: Using machine-based conviction analysis in an explainable AI investment framework\",\"authors\":\"Alicia Vidler\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2404.11080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditionally, assets are selected for inclusion in a portfolio (long or\\nshort) by human analysts. Teams of human portfolio managers (PMs) seek to weigh\\nand balance these securities using optimisation methods and other portfolio\\nconstruction processes. Often, human PMs consider human analyst recommendations\\nagainst the backdrop of the analyst's recommendation track record and the\\napplicability of the analyst to the recommendation they provide. Many firms\\nregularly ask analysts to provide a \\\"conviction\\\" level on their\\nrecommendations. In the eyes of PMs, understanding a human analyst's track\\nrecord has typically come down to basic spread sheet tabulation or, at best, a\\n\\\"virtual portfolio\\\" paper trading book to keep track of results of\\nrecommendations. Analysts' conviction around their recommendations and their \\\"paper trading\\\"\\ntrack record are two crucial workflow components between analysts and portfolio\\nconstruction. Many human PMs may not even appreciate that they factor these\\ndata points into their decision-making logic. This chapter explores how\\nArtificial Intelligence (AI) can be used to replicate these two steps and\\nbridge the gap between AI data analytics and AI-based portfolio construction\\nmethods. This field of AI is referred to as Recommender Systems (RS). This\\nchapter will further explore what metadata that RS systems functionally supply\\nto downstream systems and their features.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Portfolio Management\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Portfolio Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.11080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.11080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Recommender Systems in Financial Trading: Using machine-based conviction analysis in an explainable AI investment framework
Traditionally, assets are selected for inclusion in a portfolio (long or
short) by human analysts. Teams of human portfolio managers (PMs) seek to weigh
and balance these securities using optimisation methods and other portfolio
construction processes. Often, human PMs consider human analyst recommendations
against the backdrop of the analyst's recommendation track record and the
applicability of the analyst to the recommendation they provide. Many firms
regularly ask analysts to provide a "conviction" level on their
recommendations. In the eyes of PMs, understanding a human analyst's track
record has typically come down to basic spread sheet tabulation or, at best, a
"virtual portfolio" paper trading book to keep track of results of
recommendations. Analysts' conviction around their recommendations and their "paper trading"
track record are two crucial workflow components between analysts and portfolio
construction. Many human PMs may not even appreciate that they factor these
data points into their decision-making logic. This chapter explores how
Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be used to replicate these two steps and
bridge the gap between AI data analytics and AI-based portfolio construction
methods. This field of AI is referred to as Recommender Systems (RS). This
chapter will further explore what metadata that RS systems functionally supply
to downstream systems and their features.