金融交易中的推荐系统:在可解释的人工智能投资框架中使用基于机器的信念分析

Alicia Vidler
{"title":"金融交易中的推荐系统:在可解释的人工智能投资框架中使用基于机器的信念分析","authors":"Alicia Vidler","doi":"arxiv-2404.11080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, assets are selected for inclusion in a portfolio (long or\nshort) by human analysts. Teams of human portfolio managers (PMs) seek to weigh\nand balance these securities using optimisation methods and other portfolio\nconstruction processes. Often, human PMs consider human analyst recommendations\nagainst the backdrop of the analyst's recommendation track record and the\napplicability of the analyst to the recommendation they provide. Many firms\nregularly ask analysts to provide a \"conviction\" level on their\nrecommendations. In the eyes of PMs, understanding a human analyst's track\nrecord has typically come down to basic spread sheet tabulation or, at best, a\n\"virtual portfolio\" paper trading book to keep track of results of\nrecommendations. Analysts' conviction around their recommendations and their \"paper trading\"\ntrack record are two crucial workflow components between analysts and portfolio\nconstruction. Many human PMs may not even appreciate that they factor these\ndata points into their decision-making logic. This chapter explores how\nArtificial Intelligence (AI) can be used to replicate these two steps and\nbridge the gap between AI data analytics and AI-based portfolio construction\nmethods. This field of AI is referred to as Recommender Systems (RS). This\nchapter will further explore what metadata that RS systems functionally supply\nto downstream systems and their features.","PeriodicalId":501045,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Portfolio Management","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommender Systems in Financial Trading: Using machine-based conviction analysis in an explainable AI investment framework\",\"authors\":\"Alicia Vidler\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2404.11080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditionally, assets are selected for inclusion in a portfolio (long or\\nshort) by human analysts. Teams of human portfolio managers (PMs) seek to weigh\\nand balance these securities using optimisation methods and other portfolio\\nconstruction processes. Often, human PMs consider human analyst recommendations\\nagainst the backdrop of the analyst's recommendation track record and the\\napplicability of the analyst to the recommendation they provide. Many firms\\nregularly ask analysts to provide a \\\"conviction\\\" level on their\\nrecommendations. In the eyes of PMs, understanding a human analyst's track\\nrecord has typically come down to basic spread sheet tabulation or, at best, a\\n\\\"virtual portfolio\\\" paper trading book to keep track of results of\\nrecommendations. Analysts' conviction around their recommendations and their \\\"paper trading\\\"\\ntrack record are two crucial workflow components between analysts and portfolio\\nconstruction. Many human PMs may not even appreciate that they factor these\\ndata points into their decision-making logic. This chapter explores how\\nArtificial Intelligence (AI) can be used to replicate these two steps and\\nbridge the gap between AI data analytics and AI-based portfolio construction\\nmethods. This field of AI is referred to as Recommender Systems (RS). This\\nchapter will further explore what metadata that RS systems functionally supply\\nto downstream systems and their features.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Portfolio Management\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Portfolio Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.11080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.11080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,资产由人工分析师选择纳入投资组合(做多或做空)。人工投资组合经理(PM)团队利用优化方法和其他投资组合构建流程来权衡和平衡这些证券。通常情况下,人类投资组合经理在考虑人类分析师的建议时,会以分析师的建议跟踪记录以及分析师对其提供的建议的适用性为背景。许多公司会定期要求分析师就其建议提供 "确信 "级别。在 PM 看来,要了解分析师的业绩记录,通常只能通过基本的电子表格或 "虚拟投资组合 "纸质交易账簿来记录推荐结果。分析师对其建议的信念和 "纸面交易 "记录是分析师与投资组合构建之间两个关键的工作流程组成部分。许多人类 PM 甚至可能不会意识到,他们在决策逻辑中会考虑到这些数据点。本章将探讨如何利用人工智能(AI)来复制这两个步骤,并缩小人工智能数据分析与基于人工智能的投资组合构建方法之间的差距。这一人工智能领域被称为推荐系统(RS)。本章将进一步探讨RS系统在功能上为下游系统提供了哪些元数据及其特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recommender Systems in Financial Trading: Using machine-based conviction analysis in an explainable AI investment framework
Traditionally, assets are selected for inclusion in a portfolio (long or short) by human analysts. Teams of human portfolio managers (PMs) seek to weigh and balance these securities using optimisation methods and other portfolio construction processes. Often, human PMs consider human analyst recommendations against the backdrop of the analyst's recommendation track record and the applicability of the analyst to the recommendation they provide. Many firms regularly ask analysts to provide a "conviction" level on their recommendations. In the eyes of PMs, understanding a human analyst's track record has typically come down to basic spread sheet tabulation or, at best, a "virtual portfolio" paper trading book to keep track of results of recommendations. Analysts' conviction around their recommendations and their "paper trading" track record are two crucial workflow components between analysts and portfolio construction. Many human PMs may not even appreciate that they factor these data points into their decision-making logic. This chapter explores how Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be used to replicate these two steps and bridge the gap between AI data analytics and AI-based portfolio construction methods. This field of AI is referred to as Recommender Systems (RS). This chapter will further explore what metadata that RS systems functionally supply to downstream systems and their features.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信