一名嗜肺军团菌肺炎患者在内窥镜手术中使用高流量鼻插管进行无创呼吸支持:病例报告

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Vincenzo Pota, Francesco Coppolino, Annamaria Auricchio, Francesca Cardella, Maurizio Del Prete, Antonio Scalvenzi, Pasquale Sansone, Maria Beatrice Passavanti, Maria Caterina Pace
{"title":"一名嗜肺军团菌肺炎患者在内窥镜手术中使用高流量鼻插管进行无创呼吸支持:病例报告","authors":"Vincenzo Pota, Francesco Coppolino, Annamaria Auricchio, Francesca Cardella, Maurizio Del Prete, Antonio Scalvenzi, Pasquale Sansone, Maria Beatrice Passavanti, Maria Caterina Pace","doi":"10.1186/s13741-024-00385-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Legionella pneumophila</i> is one of the most important causes of respiratory distress in humans. More than 30% of hospital-acquired pneumonia is caused by <i>L. pneumophila</i>. Postoperative anastomotic leak after esophageal resection represents a serious surgical complication with significant morbidity and mortality. The prompt diagnosis and the initiation of therapy are essential to ameliorate the outcome. The positioning of an esophageal endoprosthesis offers a minimally invasive therapeutic approach regarding sepsis control and early oral feeding, which however is also associated with procedure-specific complications. Last year, we efforted a case anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection by positioning of endoprosthesis by endoscopic way. The patient was affected by <i>L. pneumophila</i> pneumonia. The main problem for the anesthesiologist in this case is to search an adequate and safe perioperatory management because of the acute respiratory failure due to <i>L. pneumophila</i>. The patient presented a P/F ratio between 100 and 200 mmHg configuring a picture of moderate ARDS according to the Berlin criteria. Approximately, 50% of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are attributable to the patient’s underlying condition, while the remaining 50% are related to the type of surgery and anesthetic management (Canet and Gallart 2013).</p><p>For this reason, it was decided to use a noninvasive ventilation mode, in this case with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), to avoid the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, which significantly increase during an invasive ventilation mode that requires neuromuscular blockade. This modality of oxygenation and ventilation allowed also a direct access to the mouth in order to proceed to endoscopy. The risk factors that have suggested avoiding endotracheal intubation (ETI) in favor of high-flow oxygenation, according to the American College of Physicians, are as follows: advanced age of the patient, male gender, ASA classification &gt; 3, and active respiratory infection with associated ARDS (Smetana et al. 2006). The high-flow nasal cannulas are an oxygenation device capable of providing a humidified flow of 60 L/min and a Fio2 up to 100%. Since ARDS falls under purely hypoxemic respiratory failure (type 1), the ability to ensure a high inspiratory fraction of bone without the need of ETI is an excellent solution to avoid PPCs. Periprocedural oxygenation with HFNC with sedation in spontaneous breath allowed us to guarantee adequate saturation in a patient with moderate ARDS.</p><p>A total of 77-year-old patient was admitted to our university hospital in order to effort a total gastrectomy. It must be considered that the patient was affected by an adenocarcinoma on a gastric stump and had undergone a degastrogastrectomy with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunal anastomosis. This was the third stomach surgery as the patient had previously undergone gastric resection for ulcer in 1970 with Billroth II gastrojejuno anastomosis and a second resection in 1995 for an early-stage adenocarcinoma (TNM stage IA) with a new Billroth II reconstruction. About 2 months before the last operation, the patient had presented symptoms of dysphagia, vomiting, anorexia, weight loss, and anemia. Therefore, he had performed a gastroscopy and a CT scan which had ascertained the presence of a gastric adenocarcinoma. After surgery, the patient was awakened at the operating table and was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for postoperative monitoring; on the second postoperative day, he returned to the general surgery ward. On the fourth postoperative day, the patient had respiratory failure with P/F ratio 150, returned to the ICU, and starts high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy with FiO2 40%, flow 50 l/min, and Tc 37 °C. He presented a pattern of interstitial pneumonia on chest CT scan (Fig. 1).</p><figure><figcaption><b data-test=\"figure-caption-text\">Fig. 1</b></figcaption><picture><source srcset=\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13741-024-00385-9/MediaObjects/13741_2024_385_Fig1_HTML.png?as=webp\" type=\"image/webp\"/><img alt=\"figure 1\" aria-describedby=\"Fig1\" height=\"464\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13741-024-00385-9/MediaObjects/13741_2024_385_Fig1_HTML.png\" width=\"685\"/></picture><p>Pattern of interstitial pneumonia on chest CT scan</p><span>Full size image</span><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"><use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-chevron-right-small\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"></use></svg></figure><p>He undergoes a nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2, urinary antigen research for research of <i>L. pneumonia</i> antigen. It was not possible to practice a valid bronchoaspirate and bronchial lavage as the patient was spontaneously breathing. Empiric therapy for <i>L. pneumophila</i> was started, later confirmed by urinary antigen positive for <i>Legionella pneumophila </i>(Fig. 2). Start therapy with azithromycin 500 mg every day and, on confirmation of the diagnosis, azithromycin every 12 h for 14 days.</p><figure><figcaption><b data-test=\"figure-caption-text\">Fig. 2</b></figcaption><picture><source srcset=\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13741-024-00385-9/MediaObjects/13741_2024_385_Fig2_HTML.png?as=webp\" type=\"image/webp\"/><img alt=\"figure 2\" aria-describedby=\"Fig2\" height=\"427\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13741-024-00385-9/MediaObjects/13741_2024_385_Fig2_HTML.png\" width=\"685\"/></picture><p>Legionella pneumophila</p><span>Full size image</span><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"><use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-chevron-right-small\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"></use></svg></figure><p>The postoperative course was further complicated by an esophageal anastomotic leak on the seventh postoperative day, revealed by methylene blue test, and confirmed by CT scan with Gastrografin.</p><p>The surgeon indicates the placement of an endoprosthesis. To avoid the complications of mechanical ventilation in a patient affected by <i>L. pneumophila</i>, and the impossibility of maintaining a SpO2 &gt; 92% with conventional oxygen therapy (COT) with nasal cannulas alone, we decided to continue periprocedural HFNC oxygen therapy.</p><p>We practice continuous oxygenation and ventilation during all the procedure with HFNC with the following settings: flow 60 L/min, Fio2 100%, and temperature 37 °C. Intravenous midazolam 0.05 mg/kg and sedation were started with a bolus of propofol 0.5 mg/kg and maintained in continuous infusion at 3.5 mg/kg/h. The duration of the procedure was approximately 25 min. The parameters were stable for the whole duration of the intervention with SpO2 always &gt; 95% in spontaneous breath and MAP &gt; 70 mmHg. After the procedure, the patient returned to the intensive care unit to complete the set antibiotic therapy. Three days after the operation, the patient finishes the 10 days of antibiotic therapy with azithromycin. During the following 10 days, we reduced respiratory support while always maintaining a P/F ratio &gt; 250. Initially, we alternated HFNC with high FiO2 (&gt; 40%) with MdV. From the fourth postoperative day, the patient alternated cycles of spontaneous breathing in ambient air during the day with nasal cannulas (FiO2 32%) at night. He was discharged on the 10th day without the need for chronic oxygen therapy in the surgery department.</p><p><i>Legionella</i> is an aerobic, gram-negative <i>Bacillus</i>. At present, there are 58 species and over 70 serotypes of <i>Legionella</i> identified, of which at least 24 species can cause lower respiratory tract infections in humans. Approximately, 90% of <i>Legionella pneumonia</i> is caused by <i>Legionella pneumophila</i> serogroup 1, which is widely distributed in warm, humid environments and can replicate in water at 25–42 °C. Humans usually become infected with <i>Legionella</i> through inhaling <i>Legionella</i>-containing aerosols from contaminated water sources (e.g., rain, pipes, air-conditioning systems) or inhaling directly contaminated water sources in specific conditions, such as water births. After entering the respiratory tract, <i>Legionella</i> can survive and replicate exponentially in human alveolar macrophages, releasing toxins and virulence factors, resulting in <i>L. pneumophila</i> (Bai et al. 2023).</p><p>The clinical manifestations of <i>L. pneumophila</i> infections are primarily respiratory. Two quite distinct kinds of respiratory illness may result from infection; the reasons for this dichotomy are not understood. The most common presentation is acute pneumonia, which varies in severity from mild illness that does not require hospitalization (walking pneumonia) to fatal multilobar pneumonia.</p><p>Typically, patients have high, unremitting fever and cough but do not produce much sputum.</p><p>The symptoms of <i>Legionella</i> infection undoubtedly result from a combination of physical interference with oxygenation of blood, ventilation-perfusion imbalance in the remaining lung tissue, and release of toxic products from bacteria and inflammatory cells. Bacterial factors include a protease that may be responsible for tissue damage. Cellular factors include interleukin-1, which produces fever after it is released from monocytes, and tumor necrosis factor, which may be responsible for some of the systemic symptoms; it is the causal agent of 5 to 12% of sporadic community-acquired pneumonia cases. Recent studies regarding severe community-acquired pneumonia have shown that <i>Legionella pneumophila</i> is the second most common cause of admission to ICU, not far behind pneumococcal pneumonia (Winn 1996).</p><p>Gastric stump carcinoma is a clinical entity that has been known in general surgery for decades. It has been calculated that 10% of patients undergoing distal gastric resection for benign disease will develop residual gastric cancer approximately 15–20 years after the first operation, and this is primarily due to gastroduodenal reflux (Degastrogastrectomy for cancer of the gastric stump 1999). The prognosis of gastric stump cancer is generally poor, especially due to the low resectability rates associated with intra-perioperative surgical complications (Sinning et al. 2007).</p><p>Anastomotic leakage (AL) after gastrectomy is one of the most severe postoperative complications and is related to increasing mortality. Gastric cancer remains one of the most common cancers worldwide, but the mortality shows a continuously decreasing trend on account of the developments in surgical technique and perioperative management. At present, radical gastrectomy is still the only probably curative therapy for resectable gastric cancer. Nevertheless, such surgical treatment includes the standard lymph node dissection and various reconstruction methods, and this high complexity of surgical procedure leads to a high risk of death and postoperative complications. AL is a destructive and potentially life-threatening postoperative complication, which is relevant to the increasing cost for treatment, the prolongation of hospitalization, and postoperative mortality. The incidence of AL has been reported to be 1 ~ 6% in gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy. In a study conducted on 3926 patients, AL after gastrectomy risk factors were analyzed. Univariate analyses indicated that in the elderly, the low concentrations of plasma hemoglobin, albumin, and cholesterol, diabetes, tumors located in the upper third stomach, the laparoscopic approach, proximal or total gastrectomy, esophagojejunostomy, and long operation time were hte indipendent risk facots facilitating AL development. Multivariate analysis revealed that albumin concentration, diabetes, the laparoscopic approach, and proximal or total gastrectomy were the independent risk factors facilitating AL development (He et al. 2023).</p><p>High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen is a recently developed noninvasive oxygen therapy system. It can provide heated and moist oxygen through the nasal cannula, as well as offer a much higher and predictable gas flow rate (up 60 L/min) and FiO2 (up to 100%). Studies demonstrate that HFNC completely prevents hypoxia during sedated gastroscopy via two mechanisms. First, the high-flow produces positive pressure within the nasopharyngeal space and thoracic cavity, which reduces airway obstruction and increases the end-expiratory lung volume. Second, HFNC can produce positive pharyngeal pressure during expiration with a constant flow, with the pressure mainly determined by the volume of flow and expiratory flow of the patient. Because of its potential to improve oxygenation and ventilation, HFNC has been applied in many clinical situations to prevent hypoxemia, such as in awake fiber-optic intubation, conscious sedation during bronchoscopy, and some dental treatments under intravenous sedation. In addition, a few randomized controlled trials have shown that HFNC could also reduce the risk of hypoxemia during sedated digestive endoscopy, but some studies cannot draw the same conclusion (Zhang et al. 2022).</p><p>During gastroscopy, the patient’s mouth is kept open because of the gastroscopy tube. Therefore, it is reasonable to doubt the positive airway pressure mechanism. Maintaining a constant PEEP with HFNC is challenging because it can significantly decrease with open-mouth breathing. A recent systematic review demonstrated that when subjects ventilated with HFNC opened their mouth, hypopharyngeal pressure dropped from 5.2 (3.5, 7.0) cm H<sub>2</sub>O to 1.1 (− 0.9, 2.4) cm H<sub>2</sub>O with HFNC set at 50 L/min, and nasopharyngeal pressure dropped from 6.8 to 0.8 cm H<sub>2</sub>O with HFNC set at 60 L/min (Li et al. 2023). The goal of this conduct is to favor the washout of CO2 in the anatomical dead space, including more distal conducting airways, and to maximize the alveolar fraction of oxygen through the replacement of nitrogen to oxygen, stored in the lungs as functional residual capacity (FRC). It results in a reduction of rebreathing of CO2, decreases the available pressure gradient for oxygen transfer to the alveolus, and hastens the onset of hypoxemia (Bartlett et al. 1959). </p><p>We preferred to use propofol as a sleep inducer instead of a combination of midazolam and opioids due to its more predictable pharmacokinetic profile, rapid onset, and overlapping adverse effects for the dose that was used in our case.</p><p>In a recent retrospective study on procedure- and sedation-related adverse events in 73,029 endoscopies performed in the United States, Goudra et al. identified 44 patients who required endotracheal intubation and 14 deaths (Goudra et al. 2021). Therefore, reducing the incidence of hypoxia and severe hypoxia is always an important task during sedated endoscopy procedures. The optimal strategy for reducing the risks of adverse events caused by hypoxia is to prevent the development of hypoxia during the procedure.</p><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula during sedated digestive endoscopy demonstrated that compared to SNC (steady flow nasal cannula), HFNC not only reduce the incidence of hypoxemia but also reduce the requirements for airway interventions during sedated digestive endoscopy procedures, especially in patients at low risk for hypoxemia (Zhang et al. 2022).</p><p>The management of the airways in patients affected by <i>Legionella</i> can represent a problem burdened by a series of additional risks resulting from IOT such as damage associated with mechanical ventilation, contamination of the ventilator, and delayed weaning, with an increase in hospitalization times. The use of HFNC in endoscopic procedures allows to avoid all these risks as well as the field conflict with the operator maintaining a higher oxygen saturation compared to other oxygenation devices. More studies are necessary in order to confirm this result.</p><p>All of the material is owned by the authors, and/or no permissions are required. All the data and materials are after contact with the corresponding author.</p><ul data-track-component=\"outbound reference\"><li><p>Bai L, Yang W, Li Y. Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of Legionella pneumonia. Diagnostics (basel). 2023;13(2):280. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020280.PMID:36673091;PMCID:PMC9858276.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li><p>Bartlett RG Jr, Brubach HF, Specht H. Demonstration of aventilatory mass flow during ventilation and apnea in man. J Appl Physiol. 1959;14(1):97–101.</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li><p>Canet J, Gallart L. Predicting postoperative pulmonary complications in the general population. CurrOpinAnaesthesiol. 2013;26(2):107–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e32835e8acd. (PMID: 23407154).</p><p>Article Google Scholar </p></li><li><p>Degastrogastrectomy for cancer of the gastric stump. J Chir (Paris). 1999;136(3):140–4. French. PMID: 10549011</p></li><li><p>Goudra B, Gouda G, Singh PM. Recent developments in devices used for gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation. Clin Endosc. 2021;54(2):182–192. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.057. Epub 2021 Mar 18. PMID: 33730777; PMCID: PMC8039741</p></li><li><p>He Z, Liu H, Zhou L, Li Q, Wang L, Zhang D, Xu H, Xu Z. Risk factors and conservative therapy outcomes of anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy: experience of 3,926 patients from a single gastric surgical unit. Front Oncol. 2023;15(13):1163463. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1163463.PMID:37007118;PMCID:PMC10050334.</p><p>Article Google Scholar </p></li><li><p>Li J, Albuainain FA, Tan W, et al. The effects of flow settings during high-flow nasal cannula support for adult subjects: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2023;27:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04361-5.</p><p>Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar </p></li><li><p>Sinning C, Schaefer N, Standop J, Hirner A, Wolff M. Gastric stump carcinoma – epidemiology and current concepts in pathogenesis and treatment,European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO),2027;33(2):133–139. ISSN 0748–7983,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2006.09.006.</p></li><li><p>Smetana GW, Lawrence VA, Corlell JE; American College of Physicians. perioperative pulmonary risk stratification for noncardiothoracic surgery: systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(8):581–95. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-00009. PMID: 16618956</p></li><li><p>Winn WC Jr. Legionella. In: Baron S, editor. Medical Microbiology. 4th edition. Galveston (TX): University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; 1996. Chapter 40. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK7619/</p></li><li><p>Zhang YX, He XX, Chen YP, Yang S. The effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula during sedated digestive endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res. 2022;27(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00661-8.PMID:35209948;PMCID:PMC8876126.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar </p></li></ul><p>Download references<svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"><use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-download-medium\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"></use></svg></p><p>No funding to declare.</p><h3>Authors and Affiliations</h3><ol><li><p>Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Dept. of Women, Child, General and Specialistic Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli,”, Naples, Italy</p><p>Vincenzo Pota, Francesco Coppolino, Maurizio Del Prete, Antonio Scalvenzi, Pasquale Sansone, Maria Beatrice Passavanti &amp; Maria Caterina Pace</p></li><li><p>Dept. of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli,”, Naples, Italy</p><p>Annamaria Auricchio &amp; Francesca Cardella</p></li></ol><span>Authors</span><ol><li><span>Vincenzo Pota</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Francesco Coppolino</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Annamaria Auricchio</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Francesca Cardella</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Maurizio Del Prete</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Antonio Scalvenzi</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Pasquale Sansone</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Maria Beatrice Passavanti</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Maria Caterina Pace</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li></ol><h3>Contributions</h3><p>V.P., M.D.P, A.S, A.A, M.C.P, M.B.P, P.S. wrote the main mauniscript. F.C, P.S, F.C. prepared Figs. 1 and 2. All authors reviewed the manuscript.</p><h3>Corresponding author</h3><p>Correspondence to Vincenzo Pota.</p><h3>Competing interests</h3>\n<p>The authors declare no competing interests.</p><h3>Publisher’s Note</h3><p>Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p><p><b>Open Access</b> This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.</p>\n<p>Reprints and permissions</p><img alt=\"Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark\" height=\"81\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\" width=\"57\"/><h3>Cite this article</h3><p>Pota, V., Coppolino, F., Auricchio, A. <i>et al.</i> Noninvasive respiratory support with high-flow nasal cannula in endoscopic surgery in a patient with <i>Legionella Pneumophila</i> pneumonia: a case report. <i>Perioper Med</i> <b>13</b>, 29 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00385-9</p><p>Download citation<svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"><use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-download-medium\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"></use></svg></p><ul data-test=\"publication-history\"><li><p>Received<span>: </span><span><time datetime=\"2023-07-12\">12 July 2023</time></span></p></li><li><p>Accepted<span>: </span><span><time datetime=\"2024-04-04\">04 April 2024</time></span></p></li><li><p>Published<span>: </span><span><time datetime=\"2024-04-17\">17 April 2024</time></span></p></li><li><p>DOI</abbr><span>: </span><span>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00385-9</span></p></li></ul><h3>Share this article</h3><p>Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:</p><button data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"get shareable link\" data-track-external=\"\" data-track-label=\"button\" type=\"button\">Get shareable link</button><p>Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.</p><p data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"select share url\" data-track-label=\"button\"></p><button data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"copy share url\" data-track-external=\"\" data-track-label=\"button\" type=\"button\">Copy to clipboard</button><p> Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative </p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noninvasive respiratory support with high-flow nasal cannula in endoscopic surgery in a patient with Legionella Pneumophila pneumonia: a case report\",\"authors\":\"Vincenzo Pota, Francesco Coppolino, Annamaria Auricchio, Francesca Cardella, Maurizio Del Prete, Antonio Scalvenzi, Pasquale Sansone, Maria Beatrice Passavanti, Maria Caterina Pace\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13741-024-00385-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>Legionella pneumophila</i> is one of the most important causes of respiratory distress in humans. More than 30% of hospital-acquired pneumonia is caused by <i>L. pneumophila</i>. Postoperative anastomotic leak after esophageal resection represents a serious surgical complication with significant morbidity and mortality. The prompt diagnosis and the initiation of therapy are essential to ameliorate the outcome. The positioning of an esophageal endoprosthesis offers a minimally invasive therapeutic approach regarding sepsis control and early oral feeding, which however is also associated with procedure-specific complications. Last year, we efforted a case anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection by positioning of endoprosthesis by endoscopic way. The patient was affected by <i>L. pneumophila</i> pneumonia. The main problem for the anesthesiologist in this case is to search an adequate and safe perioperatory management because of the acute respiratory failure due to <i>L. pneumophila</i>. The patient presented a P/F ratio between 100 and 200 mmHg configuring a picture of moderate ARDS according to the Berlin criteria. Approximately, 50% of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are attributable to the patient’s underlying condition, while the remaining 50% are related to the type of surgery and anesthetic management (Canet and Gallart 2013).</p><p>For this reason, it was decided to use a noninvasive ventilation mode, in this case with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), to avoid the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, which significantly increase during an invasive ventilation mode that requires neuromuscular blockade. This modality of oxygenation and ventilation allowed also a direct access to the mouth in order to proceed to endoscopy. The risk factors that have suggested avoiding endotracheal intubation (ETI) in favor of high-flow oxygenation, according to the American College of Physicians, are as follows: advanced age of the patient, male gender, ASA classification &gt; 3, and active respiratory infection with associated ARDS (Smetana et al. 2006). The high-flow nasal cannulas are an oxygenation device capable of providing a humidified flow of 60 L/min and a Fio2 up to 100%. Since ARDS falls under purely hypoxemic respiratory failure (type 1), the ability to ensure a high inspiratory fraction of bone without the need of ETI is an excellent solution to avoid PPCs. Periprocedural oxygenation with HFNC with sedation in spontaneous breath allowed us to guarantee adequate saturation in a patient with moderate ARDS.</p><p>A total of 77-year-old patient was admitted to our university hospital in order to effort a total gastrectomy. It must be considered that the patient was affected by an adenocarcinoma on a gastric stump and had undergone a degastrogastrectomy with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunal anastomosis. This was the third stomach surgery as the patient had previously undergone gastric resection for ulcer in 1970 with Billroth II gastrojejuno anastomosis and a second resection in 1995 for an early-stage adenocarcinoma (TNM stage IA) with a new Billroth II reconstruction. About 2 months before the last operation, the patient had presented symptoms of dysphagia, vomiting, anorexia, weight loss, and anemia. Therefore, he had performed a gastroscopy and a CT scan which had ascertained the presence of a gastric adenocarcinoma. After surgery, the patient was awakened at the operating table and was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for postoperative monitoring; on the second postoperative day, he returned to the general surgery ward. On the fourth postoperative day, the patient had respiratory failure with P/F ratio 150, returned to the ICU, and starts high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy with FiO2 40%, flow 50 l/min, and Tc 37 °C. He presented a pattern of interstitial pneumonia on chest CT scan (Fig. 1).</p><figure><figcaption><b data-test=\\\"figure-caption-text\\\">Fig. 1</b></figcaption><picture><source srcset=\\\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13741-024-00385-9/MediaObjects/13741_2024_385_Fig1_HTML.png?as=webp\\\" type=\\\"image/webp\\\"/><img alt=\\\"figure 1\\\" aria-describedby=\\\"Fig1\\\" height=\\\"464\\\" loading=\\\"lazy\\\" src=\\\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13741-024-00385-9/MediaObjects/13741_2024_385_Fig1_HTML.png\\\" width=\\\"685\\\"/></picture><p>Pattern of interstitial pneumonia on chest CT scan</p><span>Full size image</span><svg aria-hidden=\\\"true\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"16\\\" role=\\\"img\\\" width=\\\"16\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#icon-eds-i-chevron-right-small\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\"></use></svg></figure><p>He undergoes a nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2, urinary antigen research for research of <i>L. pneumonia</i> antigen. It was not possible to practice a valid bronchoaspirate and bronchial lavage as the patient was spontaneously breathing. Empiric therapy for <i>L. pneumophila</i> was started, later confirmed by urinary antigen positive for <i>Legionella pneumophila </i>(Fig. 2). Start therapy with azithromycin 500 mg every day and, on confirmation of the diagnosis, azithromycin every 12 h for 14 days.</p><figure><figcaption><b data-test=\\\"figure-caption-text\\\">Fig. 2</b></figcaption><picture><source srcset=\\\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13741-024-00385-9/MediaObjects/13741_2024_385_Fig2_HTML.png?as=webp\\\" type=\\\"image/webp\\\"/><img alt=\\\"figure 2\\\" aria-describedby=\\\"Fig2\\\" height=\\\"427\\\" loading=\\\"lazy\\\" src=\\\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13741-024-00385-9/MediaObjects/13741_2024_385_Fig2_HTML.png\\\" width=\\\"685\\\"/></picture><p>Legionella pneumophila</p><span>Full size image</span><svg aria-hidden=\\\"true\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"16\\\" role=\\\"img\\\" width=\\\"16\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#icon-eds-i-chevron-right-small\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\"></use></svg></figure><p>The postoperative course was further complicated by an esophageal anastomotic leak on the seventh postoperative day, revealed by methylene blue test, and confirmed by CT scan with Gastrografin.</p><p>The surgeon indicates the placement of an endoprosthesis. To avoid the complications of mechanical ventilation in a patient affected by <i>L. pneumophila</i>, and the impossibility of maintaining a SpO2 &gt; 92% with conventional oxygen therapy (COT) with nasal cannulas alone, we decided to continue periprocedural HFNC oxygen therapy.</p><p>We practice continuous oxygenation and ventilation during all the procedure with HFNC with the following settings: flow 60 L/min, Fio2 100%, and temperature 37 °C. Intravenous midazolam 0.05 mg/kg and sedation were started with a bolus of propofol 0.5 mg/kg and maintained in continuous infusion at 3.5 mg/kg/h. The duration of the procedure was approximately 25 min. The parameters were stable for the whole duration of the intervention with SpO2 always &gt; 95% in spontaneous breath and MAP &gt; 70 mmHg. After the procedure, the patient returned to the intensive care unit to complete the set antibiotic therapy. Three days after the operation, the patient finishes the 10 days of antibiotic therapy with azithromycin. During the following 10 days, we reduced respiratory support while always maintaining a P/F ratio &gt; 250. Initially, we alternated HFNC with high FiO2 (&gt; 40%) with MdV. From the fourth postoperative day, the patient alternated cycles of spontaneous breathing in ambient air during the day with nasal cannulas (FiO2 32%) at night. He was discharged on the 10th day without the need for chronic oxygen therapy in the surgery department.</p><p><i>Legionella</i> is an aerobic, gram-negative <i>Bacillus</i>. At present, there are 58 species and over 70 serotypes of <i>Legionella</i> identified, of which at least 24 species can cause lower respiratory tract infections in humans. Approximately, 90% of <i>Legionella pneumonia</i> is caused by <i>Legionella pneumophila</i> serogroup 1, which is widely distributed in warm, humid environments and can replicate in water at 25–42 °C. Humans usually become infected with <i>Legionella</i> through inhaling <i>Legionella</i>-containing aerosols from contaminated water sources (e.g., rain, pipes, air-conditioning systems) or inhaling directly contaminated water sources in specific conditions, such as water births. After entering the respiratory tract, <i>Legionella</i> can survive and replicate exponentially in human alveolar macrophages, releasing toxins and virulence factors, resulting in <i>L. pneumophila</i> (Bai et al. 2023).</p><p>The clinical manifestations of <i>L. pneumophila</i> infections are primarily respiratory. Two quite distinct kinds of respiratory illness may result from infection; the reasons for this dichotomy are not understood. The most common presentation is acute pneumonia, which varies in severity from mild illness that does not require hospitalization (walking pneumonia) to fatal multilobar pneumonia.</p><p>Typically, patients have high, unremitting fever and cough but do not produce much sputum.</p><p>The symptoms of <i>Legionella</i> infection undoubtedly result from a combination of physical interference with oxygenation of blood, ventilation-perfusion imbalance in the remaining lung tissue, and release of toxic products from bacteria and inflammatory cells. Bacterial factors include a protease that may be responsible for tissue damage. Cellular factors include interleukin-1, which produces fever after it is released from monocytes, and tumor necrosis factor, which may be responsible for some of the systemic symptoms; it is the causal agent of 5 to 12% of sporadic community-acquired pneumonia cases. Recent studies regarding severe community-acquired pneumonia have shown that <i>Legionella pneumophila</i> is the second most common cause of admission to ICU, not far behind pneumococcal pneumonia (Winn 1996).</p><p>Gastric stump carcinoma is a clinical entity that has been known in general surgery for decades. It has been calculated that 10% of patients undergoing distal gastric resection for benign disease will develop residual gastric cancer approximately 15–20 years after the first operation, and this is primarily due to gastroduodenal reflux (Degastrogastrectomy for cancer of the gastric stump 1999). The prognosis of gastric stump cancer is generally poor, especially due to the low resectability rates associated with intra-perioperative surgical complications (Sinning et al. 2007).</p><p>Anastomotic leakage (AL) after gastrectomy is one of the most severe postoperative complications and is related to increasing mortality. Gastric cancer remains one of the most common cancers worldwide, but the mortality shows a continuously decreasing trend on account of the developments in surgical technique and perioperative management. At present, radical gastrectomy is still the only probably curative therapy for resectable gastric cancer. Nevertheless, such surgical treatment includes the standard lymph node dissection and various reconstruction methods, and this high complexity of surgical procedure leads to a high risk of death and postoperative complications. AL is a destructive and potentially life-threatening postoperative complication, which is relevant to the increasing cost for treatment, the prolongation of hospitalization, and postoperative mortality. The incidence of AL has been reported to be 1 ~ 6% in gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy. In a study conducted on 3926 patients, AL after gastrectomy risk factors were analyzed. Univariate analyses indicated that in the elderly, the low concentrations of plasma hemoglobin, albumin, and cholesterol, diabetes, tumors located in the upper third stomach, the laparoscopic approach, proximal or total gastrectomy, esophagojejunostomy, and long operation time were hte indipendent risk facots facilitating AL development. Multivariate analysis revealed that albumin concentration, diabetes, the laparoscopic approach, and proximal or total gastrectomy were the independent risk factors facilitating AL development (He et al. 2023).</p><p>High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen is a recently developed noninvasive oxygen therapy system. It can provide heated and moist oxygen through the nasal cannula, as well as offer a much higher and predictable gas flow rate (up 60 L/min) and FiO2 (up to 100%). Studies demonstrate that HFNC completely prevents hypoxia during sedated gastroscopy via two mechanisms. First, the high-flow produces positive pressure within the nasopharyngeal space and thoracic cavity, which reduces airway obstruction and increases the end-expiratory lung volume. Second, HFNC can produce positive pharyngeal pressure during expiration with a constant flow, with the pressure mainly determined by the volume of flow and expiratory flow of the patient. Because of its potential to improve oxygenation and ventilation, HFNC has been applied in many clinical situations to prevent hypoxemia, such as in awake fiber-optic intubation, conscious sedation during bronchoscopy, and some dental treatments under intravenous sedation. In addition, a few randomized controlled trials have shown that HFNC could also reduce the risk of hypoxemia during sedated digestive endoscopy, but some studies cannot draw the same conclusion (Zhang et al. 2022).</p><p>During gastroscopy, the patient’s mouth is kept open because of the gastroscopy tube. Therefore, it is reasonable to doubt the positive airway pressure mechanism. Maintaining a constant PEEP with HFNC is challenging because it can significantly decrease with open-mouth breathing. A recent systematic review demonstrated that when subjects ventilated with HFNC opened their mouth, hypopharyngeal pressure dropped from 5.2 (3.5, 7.0) cm H<sub>2</sub>O to 1.1 (− 0.9, 2.4) cm H<sub>2</sub>O with HFNC set at 50 L/min, and nasopharyngeal pressure dropped from 6.8 to 0.8 cm H<sub>2</sub>O with HFNC set at 60 L/min (Li et al. 2023). The goal of this conduct is to favor the washout of CO2 in the anatomical dead space, including more distal conducting airways, and to maximize the alveolar fraction of oxygen through the replacement of nitrogen to oxygen, stored in the lungs as functional residual capacity (FRC). It results in a reduction of rebreathing of CO2, decreases the available pressure gradient for oxygen transfer to the alveolus, and hastens the onset of hypoxemia (Bartlett et al. 1959). </p><p>We preferred to use propofol as a sleep inducer instead of a combination of midazolam and opioids due to its more predictable pharmacokinetic profile, rapid onset, and overlapping adverse effects for the dose that was used in our case.</p><p>In a recent retrospective study on procedure- and sedation-related adverse events in 73,029 endoscopies performed in the United States, Goudra et al. identified 44 patients who required endotracheal intubation and 14 deaths (Goudra et al. 2021). Therefore, reducing the incidence of hypoxia and severe hypoxia is always an important task during sedated endoscopy procedures. The optimal strategy for reducing the risks of adverse events caused by hypoxia is to prevent the development of hypoxia during the procedure.</p><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula during sedated digestive endoscopy demonstrated that compared to SNC (steady flow nasal cannula), HFNC not only reduce the incidence of hypoxemia but also reduce the requirements for airway interventions during sedated digestive endoscopy procedures, especially in patients at low risk for hypoxemia (Zhang et al. 2022).</p><p>The management of the airways in patients affected by <i>Legionella</i> can represent a problem burdened by a series of additional risks resulting from IOT such as damage associated with mechanical ventilation, contamination of the ventilator, and delayed weaning, with an increase in hospitalization times. The use of HFNC in endoscopic procedures allows to avoid all these risks as well as the field conflict with the operator maintaining a higher oxygen saturation compared to other oxygenation devices. More studies are necessary in order to confirm this result.</p><p>All of the material is owned by the authors, and/or no permissions are required. All the data and materials are after contact with the corresponding author.</p><ul data-track-component=\\\"outbound reference\\\"><li><p>Bai L, Yang W, Li Y. Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of Legionella pneumonia. Diagnostics (basel). 2023;13(2):280. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020280.PMID:36673091;PMCID:PMC9858276.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li><p>Bartlett RG Jr, Brubach HF, Specht H. Demonstration of aventilatory mass flow during ventilation and apnea in man. J Appl Physiol. 1959;14(1):97–101.</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li><p>Canet J, Gallart L. Predicting postoperative pulmonary complications in the general population. CurrOpinAnaesthesiol. 2013;26(2):107–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e32835e8acd. (PMID: 23407154).</p><p>Article Google Scholar </p></li><li><p>Degastrogastrectomy for cancer of the gastric stump. J Chir (Paris). 1999;136(3):140–4. French. PMID: 10549011</p></li><li><p>Goudra B, Gouda G, Singh PM. Recent developments in devices used for gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation. Clin Endosc. 2021;54(2):182–192. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.057. Epub 2021 Mar 18. PMID: 33730777; PMCID: PMC8039741</p></li><li><p>He Z, Liu H, Zhou L, Li Q, Wang L, Zhang D, Xu H, Xu Z. Risk factors and conservative therapy outcomes of anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy: experience of 3,926 patients from a single gastric surgical unit. Front Oncol. 2023;15(13):1163463. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1163463.PMID:37007118;PMCID:PMC10050334.</p><p>Article Google Scholar </p></li><li><p>Li J, Albuainain FA, Tan W, et al. The effects of flow settings during high-flow nasal cannula support for adult subjects: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2023;27:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04361-5.</p><p>Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar </p></li><li><p>Sinning C, Schaefer N, Standop J, Hirner A, Wolff M. Gastric stump carcinoma – epidemiology and current concepts in pathogenesis and treatment,European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO),2027;33(2):133–139. ISSN 0748–7983,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2006.09.006.</p></li><li><p>Smetana GW, Lawrence VA, Corlell JE; American College of Physicians. perioperative pulmonary risk stratification for noncardiothoracic surgery: systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(8):581–95. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-00009. PMID: 16618956</p></li><li><p>Winn WC Jr. Legionella. In: Baron S, editor. Medical Microbiology. 4th edition. Galveston (TX): University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; 1996. Chapter 40. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK7619/</p></li><li><p>Zhang YX, He XX, Chen YP, Yang S. The effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula during sedated digestive endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res. 2022;27(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00661-8.PMID:35209948;PMCID:PMC8876126.</p><p>Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar </p></li></ul><p>Download references<svg aria-hidden=\\\"true\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"16\\\" role=\\\"img\\\" width=\\\"16\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#icon-eds-i-download-medium\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\"></use></svg></p><p>No funding to declare.</p><h3>Authors and Affiliations</h3><ol><li><p>Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Dept. of Women, Child, General and Specialistic Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli,”, Naples, Italy</p><p>Vincenzo Pota, Francesco Coppolino, Maurizio Del Prete, Antonio Scalvenzi, Pasquale Sansone, Maria Beatrice Passavanti &amp; Maria Caterina Pace</p></li><li><p>Dept. of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli,”, Naples, Italy</p><p>Annamaria Auricchio &amp; Francesca Cardella</p></li></ol><span>Authors</span><ol><li><span>Vincenzo Pota</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Francesco Coppolino</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Annamaria Auricchio</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Francesca Cardella</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Maurizio Del Prete</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Antonio Scalvenzi</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Pasquale Sansone</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Maria Beatrice Passavanti</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Maria Caterina Pace</span>View author publications<p>You can also search for this author in <span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li></ol><h3>Contributions</h3><p>V.P., M.D.P, A.S, A.A, M.C.P, M.B.P, P.S. wrote the main mauniscript. F.C, P.S, F.C. prepared Figs. 1 and 2. All authors reviewed the manuscript.</p><h3>Corresponding author</h3><p>Correspondence to Vincenzo Pota.</p><h3>Competing interests</h3>\\n<p>The authors declare no competing interests.</p><h3>Publisher’s Note</h3><p>Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p><p><b>Open Access</b> This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.</p>\\n<p>Reprints and permissions</p><img alt=\\\"Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark\\\" height=\\\"81\\\" loading=\\\"lazy\\\" src=\\\"\\\" width=\\\"57\\\"/><h3>Cite this article</h3><p>Pota, V., Coppolino, F., Auricchio, A. <i>et al.</i> Noninvasive respiratory support with high-flow nasal cannula in endoscopic surgery in a patient with <i>Legionella Pneumophila</i> pneumonia: a case report. <i>Perioper Med</i> <b>13</b>, 29 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00385-9</p><p>Download citation<svg aria-hidden=\\\"true\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"16\\\" role=\\\"img\\\" width=\\\"16\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#icon-eds-i-download-medium\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\"></use></svg></p><ul data-test=\\\"publication-history\\\"><li><p>Received<span>: </span><span><time datetime=\\\"2023-07-12\\\">12 July 2023</time></span></p></li><li><p>Accepted<span>: </span><span><time datetime=\\\"2024-04-04\\\">04 April 2024</time></span></p></li><li><p>Published<span>: </span><span><time datetime=\\\"2024-04-17\\\">17 April 2024</time></span></p></li><li><p>DOI</abbr><span>: </span><span>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00385-9</span></p></li></ul><h3>Share this article</h3><p>Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:</p><button data-track=\\\"click\\\" data-track-action=\\\"get shareable link\\\" data-track-external=\\\"\\\" data-track-label=\\\"button\\\" type=\\\"button\\\">Get shareable link</button><p>Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.</p><p data-track=\\\"click\\\" data-track-action=\\\"select share url\\\" data-track-label=\\\"button\\\"></p><button data-track=\\\"click\\\" data-track-action=\\\"copy share url\\\" data-track-external=\\\"\\\" data-track-label=\\\"button\\\" type=\\\"button\\\">Copy to clipboard</button><p> Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perioperative Medicine\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perioperative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00385-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00385-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

嗜肺军团菌是导致人类呼吸困难的最重要原因之一。超过 30% 的医院获得性肺炎是由嗜肺军团菌引起的。食管切除术后吻合口漏是一种严重的外科并发症,发病率和死亡率都很高。及时诊断和开始治疗对改善结果至关重要。食管内假体的定位为脓毒症控制和早期口服喂养提供了一种微创治疗方法,但也与手术特定并发症有关。去年,我们通过内窥镜方式定位了一例食管切除术后吻合口漏的患者。患者感染了嗜肺杆菌肺炎。在这个病例中,麻醉师面临的主要问题是,由于嗜肺菌导致的急性呼吸衰竭,如何在围手术期进行适当而安全的处理。根据柏林标准,患者的 P/F 比值在 100 至 200 mmHg 之间,属于中度 ARDS。大约 50%的术后肺部并发症(PPCs)可归因于患者的基础疾病,而其余 50%则与手术类型和麻醉管理有关(Canet 和 Gallart,2013 年)。因此,我们决定使用无创通气模式,在本例中使用高流量鼻插管(HFNC),以避免术后肺部并发症的风险,因为在需要神经肌肉阻断的有创通气模式下,术后肺部并发症的风险会显著增加。这种吸氧和通气方式还可以直接进入口腔,以便进行内窥镜检查。根据美国内科医师学会(American College of Physicians)的建议,避免气管插管(ETI)而改用高流量吸氧的风险因素如下:患者高龄、男性、ASA 分级为 3 级以及伴有 ARDS 的活动性呼吸道感染(Smetana 等人,2006 年)。高流量鼻插管是一种氧合设备,能够提供 60 L/min 的加湿流量和高达 100% 的 Fio2。由于 ARDS 属于纯缺氧性呼吸衰竭(1 型),因此无需 ETI 即可确保高吸入骨分数是避免 PPC 的绝佳解决方案。在中度 ARDS 患者的自主呼吸中使用 HFNC 和镇静剂进行围手术期氧合,使我们能够保证足够的饱和度。必须考虑到的是,患者因胃残端腺癌而接受了胃切除术,并进行了 Roux-en-Y 食管空肠吻合术。这是患者第三次接受胃部手术,因为他曾于1970年因溃疡接受胃切除术,并进行了比洛斯II胃空肠吻合术,1995年因早期腺癌(TNM分期IA)接受第二次切除术,并进行了新的比洛斯II重建术。上次手术前约两个月,患者出现吞咽困难、呕吐、厌食、体重下降和贫血症状。因此,他进行了胃镜检查和 CT 扫描,结果发现了胃腺癌。术后,患者在手术台上被唤醒,并被送入重症监护室(ICU)进行术后监测;术后第二天,他回到了普外科病房。术后第四天,患者出现呼吸衰竭,P/F 比值为 150,回到重症监护室,开始高流量鼻插管吸氧治疗,FiO2 为 40%,流量为 50 升/分钟,Tc 为 37 °C。他接受了鼻咽拭子检测 SARS-CoV-2,尿抗原检测肺炎球菌抗原。由于患者有自主呼吸,因此无法进行有效的支气管抽吸和支气管灌洗。开始对嗜肺军团菌进行经验性治疗,后经尿抗原证实嗜肺军团菌阳性(图 2)。开始每天使用阿奇霉素 500 毫克,确诊后每 12 小时使用一次阿奇霉素,连续使用 14 天。图 2 嗜肺军团菌全图术后第七天出现食管吻合口漏,使术后过程更加复杂。为了避免嗜肺病毒感染者机械通气的并发症,以及仅用鼻插管进行常规氧疗(COT)无法维持 92% 的 SpO2,我们决定继续进行围手术期高频核磁共振氧疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Noninvasive respiratory support with high-flow nasal cannula in endoscopic surgery in a patient with Legionella Pneumophila pneumonia: a case report

Legionella pneumophila is one of the most important causes of respiratory distress in humans. More than 30% of hospital-acquired pneumonia is caused by L. pneumophila. Postoperative anastomotic leak after esophageal resection represents a serious surgical complication with significant morbidity and mortality. The prompt diagnosis and the initiation of therapy are essential to ameliorate the outcome. The positioning of an esophageal endoprosthesis offers a minimally invasive therapeutic approach regarding sepsis control and early oral feeding, which however is also associated with procedure-specific complications. Last year, we efforted a case anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection by positioning of endoprosthesis by endoscopic way. The patient was affected by L. pneumophila pneumonia. The main problem for the anesthesiologist in this case is to search an adequate and safe perioperatory management because of the acute respiratory failure due to L. pneumophila. The patient presented a P/F ratio between 100 and 200 mmHg configuring a picture of moderate ARDS according to the Berlin criteria. Approximately, 50% of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are attributable to the patient’s underlying condition, while the remaining 50% are related to the type of surgery and anesthetic management (Canet and Gallart 2013).

For this reason, it was decided to use a noninvasive ventilation mode, in this case with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), to avoid the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, which significantly increase during an invasive ventilation mode that requires neuromuscular blockade. This modality of oxygenation and ventilation allowed also a direct access to the mouth in order to proceed to endoscopy. The risk factors that have suggested avoiding endotracheal intubation (ETI) in favor of high-flow oxygenation, according to the American College of Physicians, are as follows: advanced age of the patient, male gender, ASA classification > 3, and active respiratory infection with associated ARDS (Smetana et al. 2006). The high-flow nasal cannulas are an oxygenation device capable of providing a humidified flow of 60 L/min and a Fio2 up to 100%. Since ARDS falls under purely hypoxemic respiratory failure (type 1), the ability to ensure a high inspiratory fraction of bone without the need of ETI is an excellent solution to avoid PPCs. Periprocedural oxygenation with HFNC with sedation in spontaneous breath allowed us to guarantee adequate saturation in a patient with moderate ARDS.

A total of 77-year-old patient was admitted to our university hospital in order to effort a total gastrectomy. It must be considered that the patient was affected by an adenocarcinoma on a gastric stump and had undergone a degastrogastrectomy with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunal anastomosis. This was the third stomach surgery as the patient had previously undergone gastric resection for ulcer in 1970 with Billroth II gastrojejuno anastomosis and a second resection in 1995 for an early-stage adenocarcinoma (TNM stage IA) with a new Billroth II reconstruction. About 2 months before the last operation, the patient had presented symptoms of dysphagia, vomiting, anorexia, weight loss, and anemia. Therefore, he had performed a gastroscopy and a CT scan which had ascertained the presence of a gastric adenocarcinoma. After surgery, the patient was awakened at the operating table and was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for postoperative monitoring; on the second postoperative day, he returned to the general surgery ward. On the fourth postoperative day, the patient had respiratory failure with P/F ratio 150, returned to the ICU, and starts high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy with FiO2 40%, flow 50 l/min, and Tc 37 °C. He presented a pattern of interstitial pneumonia on chest CT scan (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pattern of interstitial pneumonia on chest CT scan

Full size image

He undergoes a nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2, urinary antigen research for research of L. pneumonia antigen. It was not possible to practice a valid bronchoaspirate and bronchial lavage as the patient was spontaneously breathing. Empiric therapy for L. pneumophila was started, later confirmed by urinary antigen positive for Legionella pneumophila (Fig. 2). Start therapy with azithromycin 500 mg every day and, on confirmation of the diagnosis, azithromycin every 12 h for 14 days.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Legionella pneumophila

Full size image

The postoperative course was further complicated by an esophageal anastomotic leak on the seventh postoperative day, revealed by methylene blue test, and confirmed by CT scan with Gastrografin.

The surgeon indicates the placement of an endoprosthesis. To avoid the complications of mechanical ventilation in a patient affected by L. pneumophila, and the impossibility of maintaining a SpO2 > 92% with conventional oxygen therapy (COT) with nasal cannulas alone, we decided to continue periprocedural HFNC oxygen therapy.

We practice continuous oxygenation and ventilation during all the procedure with HFNC with the following settings: flow 60 L/min, Fio2 100%, and temperature 37 °C. Intravenous midazolam 0.05 mg/kg and sedation were started with a bolus of propofol 0.5 mg/kg and maintained in continuous infusion at 3.5 mg/kg/h. The duration of the procedure was approximately 25 min. The parameters were stable for the whole duration of the intervention with SpO2 always > 95% in spontaneous breath and MAP > 70 mmHg. After the procedure, the patient returned to the intensive care unit to complete the set antibiotic therapy. Three days after the operation, the patient finishes the 10 days of antibiotic therapy with azithromycin. During the following 10 days, we reduced respiratory support while always maintaining a P/F ratio > 250. Initially, we alternated HFNC with high FiO2 (> 40%) with MdV. From the fourth postoperative day, the patient alternated cycles of spontaneous breathing in ambient air during the day with nasal cannulas (FiO2 32%) at night. He was discharged on the 10th day without the need for chronic oxygen therapy in the surgery department.

Legionella is an aerobic, gram-negative Bacillus. At present, there are 58 species and over 70 serotypes of Legionella identified, of which at least 24 species can cause lower respiratory tract infections in humans. Approximately, 90% of Legionella pneumonia is caused by Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, which is widely distributed in warm, humid environments and can replicate in water at 25–42 °C. Humans usually become infected with Legionella through inhaling Legionella-containing aerosols from contaminated water sources (e.g., rain, pipes, air-conditioning systems) or inhaling directly contaminated water sources in specific conditions, such as water births. After entering the respiratory tract, Legionella can survive and replicate exponentially in human alveolar macrophages, releasing toxins and virulence factors, resulting in L. pneumophila (Bai et al. 2023).

The clinical manifestations of L. pneumophila infections are primarily respiratory. Two quite distinct kinds of respiratory illness may result from infection; the reasons for this dichotomy are not understood. The most common presentation is acute pneumonia, which varies in severity from mild illness that does not require hospitalization (walking pneumonia) to fatal multilobar pneumonia.

Typically, patients have high, unremitting fever and cough but do not produce much sputum.

The symptoms of Legionella infection undoubtedly result from a combination of physical interference with oxygenation of blood, ventilation-perfusion imbalance in the remaining lung tissue, and release of toxic products from bacteria and inflammatory cells. Bacterial factors include a protease that may be responsible for tissue damage. Cellular factors include interleukin-1, which produces fever after it is released from monocytes, and tumor necrosis factor, which may be responsible for some of the systemic symptoms; it is the causal agent of 5 to 12% of sporadic community-acquired pneumonia cases. Recent studies regarding severe community-acquired pneumonia have shown that Legionella pneumophila is the second most common cause of admission to ICU, not far behind pneumococcal pneumonia (Winn 1996).

Gastric stump carcinoma is a clinical entity that has been known in general surgery for decades. It has been calculated that 10% of patients undergoing distal gastric resection for benign disease will develop residual gastric cancer approximately 15–20 years after the first operation, and this is primarily due to gastroduodenal reflux (Degastrogastrectomy for cancer of the gastric stump 1999). The prognosis of gastric stump cancer is generally poor, especially due to the low resectability rates associated with intra-perioperative surgical complications (Sinning et al. 2007).

Anastomotic leakage (AL) after gastrectomy is one of the most severe postoperative complications and is related to increasing mortality. Gastric cancer remains one of the most common cancers worldwide, but the mortality shows a continuously decreasing trend on account of the developments in surgical technique and perioperative management. At present, radical gastrectomy is still the only probably curative therapy for resectable gastric cancer. Nevertheless, such surgical treatment includes the standard lymph node dissection and various reconstruction methods, and this high complexity of surgical procedure leads to a high risk of death and postoperative complications. AL is a destructive and potentially life-threatening postoperative complication, which is relevant to the increasing cost for treatment, the prolongation of hospitalization, and postoperative mortality. The incidence of AL has been reported to be 1 ~ 6% in gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy. In a study conducted on 3926 patients, AL after gastrectomy risk factors were analyzed. Univariate analyses indicated that in the elderly, the low concentrations of plasma hemoglobin, albumin, and cholesterol, diabetes, tumors located in the upper third stomach, the laparoscopic approach, proximal or total gastrectomy, esophagojejunostomy, and long operation time were hte indipendent risk facots facilitating AL development. Multivariate analysis revealed that albumin concentration, diabetes, the laparoscopic approach, and proximal or total gastrectomy were the independent risk factors facilitating AL development (He et al. 2023).

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen is a recently developed noninvasive oxygen therapy system. It can provide heated and moist oxygen through the nasal cannula, as well as offer a much higher and predictable gas flow rate (up 60 L/min) and FiO2 (up to 100%). Studies demonstrate that HFNC completely prevents hypoxia during sedated gastroscopy via two mechanisms. First, the high-flow produces positive pressure within the nasopharyngeal space and thoracic cavity, which reduces airway obstruction and increases the end-expiratory lung volume. Second, HFNC can produce positive pharyngeal pressure during expiration with a constant flow, with the pressure mainly determined by the volume of flow and expiratory flow of the patient. Because of its potential to improve oxygenation and ventilation, HFNC has been applied in many clinical situations to prevent hypoxemia, such as in awake fiber-optic intubation, conscious sedation during bronchoscopy, and some dental treatments under intravenous sedation. In addition, a few randomized controlled trials have shown that HFNC could also reduce the risk of hypoxemia during sedated digestive endoscopy, but some studies cannot draw the same conclusion (Zhang et al. 2022).

During gastroscopy, the patient’s mouth is kept open because of the gastroscopy tube. Therefore, it is reasonable to doubt the positive airway pressure mechanism. Maintaining a constant PEEP with HFNC is challenging because it can significantly decrease with open-mouth breathing. A recent systematic review demonstrated that when subjects ventilated with HFNC opened their mouth, hypopharyngeal pressure dropped from 5.2 (3.5, 7.0) cm H2O to 1.1 (− 0.9, 2.4) cm H2O with HFNC set at 50 L/min, and nasopharyngeal pressure dropped from 6.8 to 0.8 cm H2O with HFNC set at 60 L/min (Li et al. 2023). The goal of this conduct is to favor the washout of CO2 in the anatomical dead space, including more distal conducting airways, and to maximize the alveolar fraction of oxygen through the replacement of nitrogen to oxygen, stored in the lungs as functional residual capacity (FRC). It results in a reduction of rebreathing of CO2, decreases the available pressure gradient for oxygen transfer to the alveolus, and hastens the onset of hypoxemia (Bartlett et al. 1959).

We preferred to use propofol as a sleep inducer instead of a combination of midazolam and opioids due to its more predictable pharmacokinetic profile, rapid onset, and overlapping adverse effects for the dose that was used in our case.

In a recent retrospective study on procedure- and sedation-related adverse events in 73,029 endoscopies performed in the United States, Goudra et al. identified 44 patients who required endotracheal intubation and 14 deaths (Goudra et al. 2021). Therefore, reducing the incidence of hypoxia and severe hypoxia is always an important task during sedated endoscopy procedures. The optimal strategy for reducing the risks of adverse events caused by hypoxia is to prevent the development of hypoxia during the procedure.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula during sedated digestive endoscopy demonstrated that compared to SNC (steady flow nasal cannula), HFNC not only reduce the incidence of hypoxemia but also reduce the requirements for airway interventions during sedated digestive endoscopy procedures, especially in patients at low risk for hypoxemia (Zhang et al. 2022).

The management of the airways in patients affected by Legionella can represent a problem burdened by a series of additional risks resulting from IOT such as damage associated with mechanical ventilation, contamination of the ventilator, and delayed weaning, with an increase in hospitalization times. The use of HFNC in endoscopic procedures allows to avoid all these risks as well as the field conflict with the operator maintaining a higher oxygen saturation compared to other oxygenation devices. More studies are necessary in order to confirm this result.

All of the material is owned by the authors, and/or no permissions are required. All the data and materials are after contact with the corresponding author.

  • Bai L, Yang W, Li Y. Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of Legionella pneumonia. Diagnostics (basel). 2023;13(2):280. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020280.PMID:36673091;PMCID:PMC9858276.

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Bartlett RG Jr, Brubach HF, Specht H. Demonstration of aventilatory mass flow during ventilation and apnea in man. J Appl Physiol. 1959;14(1):97–101.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Canet J, Gallart L. Predicting postoperative pulmonary complications in the general population. CurrOpinAnaesthesiol. 2013;26(2):107–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e32835e8acd. (PMID: 23407154).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Degastrogastrectomy for cancer of the gastric stump. J Chir (Paris). 1999;136(3):140–4. French. PMID: 10549011

  • Goudra B, Gouda G, Singh PM. Recent developments in devices used for gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation. Clin Endosc. 2021;54(2):182–192. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.057. Epub 2021 Mar 18. PMID: 33730777; PMCID: PMC8039741

  • He Z, Liu H, Zhou L, Li Q, Wang L, Zhang D, Xu H, Xu Z. Risk factors and conservative therapy outcomes of anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy: experience of 3,926 patients from a single gastric surgical unit. Front Oncol. 2023;15(13):1163463. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1163463.PMID:37007118;PMCID:PMC10050334.

    Article Google Scholar

  • Li J, Albuainain FA, Tan W, et al. The effects of flow settings during high-flow nasal cannula support for adult subjects: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2023;27:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04361-5.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Sinning C, Schaefer N, Standop J, Hirner A, Wolff M. Gastric stump carcinoma – epidemiology and current concepts in pathogenesis and treatment,European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO),2027;33(2):133–139. ISSN 0748–7983,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2006.09.006.

  • Smetana GW, Lawrence VA, Corlell JE; American College of Physicians. perioperative pulmonary risk stratification for noncardiothoracic surgery: systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(8):581–95. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-00009. PMID: 16618956

  • Winn WC Jr. Legionella. In: Baron S, editor. Medical Microbiology. 4th edition. Galveston (TX): University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; 1996. Chapter 40. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK7619/

  • Zhang YX, He XX, Chen YP, Yang S. The effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula during sedated digestive endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res. 2022;27(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00661-8.PMID:35209948;PMCID:PMC8876126.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

No funding to declare.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Dept. of Women, Child, General and Specialistic Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli,”, Naples, Italy

    Vincenzo Pota, Francesco Coppolino, Maurizio Del Prete, Antonio Scalvenzi, Pasquale Sansone, Maria Beatrice Passavanti & Maria Caterina Pace

  2. Dept. of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli,”, Naples, Italy

    Annamaria Auricchio & Francesca Cardella

Authors
  1. Vincenzo PotaView author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francesco CoppolinoView author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Annamaria AuricchioView author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francesca CardellaView author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maurizio Del PreteView author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Antonio ScalvenziView author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Pasquale SansoneView author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Maria Beatrice PassavantiView author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Maria Caterina PaceView author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

V.P., M.D.P, A.S, A.A, M.C.P, M.B.P, P.S. wrote the main mauniscript. F.C, P.S, F.C. prepared Figs. 1 and 2. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincenzo Pota.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pota, V., Coppolino, F., Auricchio, A. et al. Noninvasive respiratory support with high-flow nasal cannula in endoscopic surgery in a patient with Legionella Pneumophila pneumonia: a case report. Perioper Med 13, 29 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00385-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00385-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信