两项研究的故事:外周嗜酸性粒细胞增多与在成人粪便样本中检测到脆弱片阿米巴是否有关?

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Priya Garg , John Chetwood , Thuy Phan , Timothy Gray , Genevieve McKew
{"title":"两项研究的故事:外周嗜酸性粒细胞增多与在成人粪便样本中检测到脆弱片阿米巴是否有关?","authors":"Priya Garg ,&nbsp;John Chetwood ,&nbsp;Thuy Phan ,&nbsp;Timothy Gray ,&nbsp;Genevieve McKew","doi":"10.1016/j.pathol.2024.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The protozoan parasite <em>Dientamoeba fragilis</em> is a frequently isolated stool organism and postulated cause of gastrointestinal symptoms. Peripheral blood eosinophilia has been described. This is the first study amongst the Australasian adult population to assess the relationship between organism detection and eosinophilia.</p><p>A case-control study took place over 7 years at a single Sydney laboratory site, evaluating patients with <em>D. fragilis</em> identified on stool using real-time PCR with a recent full blood count, to control groups with <em>Giardia</em> spp. and sequential negatives with neither organism. A nested study compared those with microscopic evidence of <em>D. fragilis</em> as a marker of disease burden, to molecular diagnosis alone.</p><p>Sixty-four <em>D. fragilis</em>, 30 <em>Giardia</em> spp., and 94 sequential controls were enrolled. Only 60.1% of samples were preserved in sodium acetate-acetic acid formalin (SAF) fixative, indication mostly not documented. The major co-organism detected amongst all participants was <em>Blastocystis</em> sp., particularly in the <em>D. fragilis</em> cohort (37.2%). The most common pathogen amongst sequential controls was <em>Campylobacter</em> spp. (7.4%). Patients with <em>D. fragilis</em> were more likely (12.5%) to have a clinically significant eosinophilia (&gt;0.5×10<sup>9</sup>/L) compared to those with <em>Giardia</em> spp. (3.3%) or sequential controls (4.3%) (<em>p</em>=0.03). A significant difference was also noted in the overall median eosinophil count of those with <em>D. fragilis</em> versus all controls (0.2 vs 0.1×10<sup>9</sup>/L, <em>p</em>=0.01); however, this was within the reference interval (where up to &gt;0.5×10<sup>9</sup>/L is accepted in healthy individuals within a typical population). No eosinophil difference was found between those with molecular versus additional microscopic detection of <em>D. fragilis</em> (0.1 vs 0.1×10<sup>9</sup>/L).</p><p>These results support an association between the identification of clinically significant peripheral blood eosinophilia and <em>D. fragilis</em> presence, which may impact the diagnostic approach to the patient with unexplained eosinophilia. Further prospective trials may help assess any significance further and the implication of co-carriage with other enteric organisms. The importance of clinical indication and need for appropriate fixative media in diagnostic parasitology are also highlighted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19915,"journal":{"name":"Pathology","volume":"56 5","pages":"Pages 688-695"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031302524000977/pdfft?md5=fade9799ae330adfbbe74b798282dad0&pid=1-s2.0-S0031302524000977-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A tale of two studies: is peripheral eosinophilia associated with Dientamoeba fragilis detection in adult stool samples?\",\"authors\":\"Priya Garg ,&nbsp;John Chetwood ,&nbsp;Thuy Phan ,&nbsp;Timothy Gray ,&nbsp;Genevieve McKew\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pathol.2024.01.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The protozoan parasite <em>Dientamoeba fragilis</em> is a frequently isolated stool organism and postulated cause of gastrointestinal symptoms. Peripheral blood eosinophilia has been described. This is the first study amongst the Australasian adult population to assess the relationship between organism detection and eosinophilia.</p><p>A case-control study took place over 7 years at a single Sydney laboratory site, evaluating patients with <em>D. fragilis</em> identified on stool using real-time PCR with a recent full blood count, to control groups with <em>Giardia</em> spp. and sequential negatives with neither organism. A nested study compared those with microscopic evidence of <em>D. fragilis</em> as a marker of disease burden, to molecular diagnosis alone.</p><p>Sixty-four <em>D. fragilis</em>, 30 <em>Giardia</em> spp., and 94 sequential controls were enrolled. Only 60.1% of samples were preserved in sodium acetate-acetic acid formalin (SAF) fixative, indication mostly not documented. The major co-organism detected amongst all participants was <em>Blastocystis</em> sp., particularly in the <em>D. fragilis</em> cohort (37.2%). The most common pathogen amongst sequential controls was <em>Campylobacter</em> spp. (7.4%). Patients with <em>D. fragilis</em> were more likely (12.5%) to have a clinically significant eosinophilia (&gt;0.5×10<sup>9</sup>/L) compared to those with <em>Giardia</em> spp. (3.3%) or sequential controls (4.3%) (<em>p</em>=0.03). A significant difference was also noted in the overall median eosinophil count of those with <em>D. fragilis</em> versus all controls (0.2 vs 0.1×10<sup>9</sup>/L, <em>p</em>=0.01); however, this was within the reference interval (where up to &gt;0.5×10<sup>9</sup>/L is accepted in healthy individuals within a typical population). No eosinophil difference was found between those with molecular versus additional microscopic detection of <em>D. fragilis</em> (0.1 vs 0.1×10<sup>9</sup>/L).</p><p>These results support an association between the identification of clinically significant peripheral blood eosinophilia and <em>D. fragilis</em> presence, which may impact the diagnostic approach to the patient with unexplained eosinophilia. Further prospective trials may help assess any significance further and the implication of co-carriage with other enteric organisms. The importance of clinical indication and need for appropriate fixative media in diagnostic parasitology are also highlighted.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathology\",\"volume\":\"56 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 688-695\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031302524000977/pdfft?md5=fade9799ae330adfbbe74b798282dad0&pid=1-s2.0-S0031302524000977-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031302524000977\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031302524000977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原生动物寄生虫是一种经常在粪便中分离到的生物,被认为是导致胃肠道症状的原因。外周血嗜酸性粒细胞增多已有描述。这是首次在澳大拉西亚成年人群中开展研究,以评估病原体检测与嗜酸性粒细胞增多之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A tale of two studies: is peripheral eosinophilia associated with Dientamoeba fragilis detection in adult stool samples?

The protozoan parasite Dientamoeba fragilis is a frequently isolated stool organism and postulated cause of gastrointestinal symptoms. Peripheral blood eosinophilia has been described. This is the first study amongst the Australasian adult population to assess the relationship between organism detection and eosinophilia.

A case-control study took place over 7 years at a single Sydney laboratory site, evaluating patients with D. fragilis identified on stool using real-time PCR with a recent full blood count, to control groups with Giardia spp. and sequential negatives with neither organism. A nested study compared those with microscopic evidence of D. fragilis as a marker of disease burden, to molecular diagnosis alone.

Sixty-four D. fragilis, 30 Giardia spp., and 94 sequential controls were enrolled. Only 60.1% of samples were preserved in sodium acetate-acetic acid formalin (SAF) fixative, indication mostly not documented. The major co-organism detected amongst all participants was Blastocystis sp., particularly in the D. fragilis cohort (37.2%). The most common pathogen amongst sequential controls was Campylobacter spp. (7.4%). Patients with D. fragilis were more likely (12.5%) to have a clinically significant eosinophilia (>0.5×109/L) compared to those with Giardia spp. (3.3%) or sequential controls (4.3%) (p=0.03). A significant difference was also noted in the overall median eosinophil count of those with D. fragilis versus all controls (0.2 vs 0.1×109/L, p=0.01); however, this was within the reference interval (where up to >0.5×109/L is accepted in healthy individuals within a typical population). No eosinophil difference was found between those with molecular versus additional microscopic detection of D. fragilis (0.1 vs 0.1×109/L).

These results support an association between the identification of clinically significant peripheral blood eosinophilia and D. fragilis presence, which may impact the diagnostic approach to the patient with unexplained eosinophilia. Further prospective trials may help assess any significance further and the implication of co-carriage with other enteric organisms. The importance of clinical indication and need for appropriate fixative media in diagnostic parasitology are also highlighted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pathology
Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.20%
发文量
459
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Published by Elsevier from 2016 Pathology is the official journal of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA). It is committed to publishing peer-reviewed, original articles related to the science of pathology in its broadest sense, including anatomical pathology, chemical pathology and biochemistry, cytopathology, experimental pathology, forensic pathology and morbid anatomy, genetics, haematology, immunology and immunopathology, microbiology and molecular pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信