疑似自身免疫性脑炎:对转诊治疗性血浆置换患者的回顾性研究

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Elizabeth P. Crowe, Luisa A. Diaz-Arias, Ralph Habis, Sonja O. Vozniak, Romergryko G. Geocadin, Arun Venkatesan, Aaron A.R. Tobian, John C. Probasco, Evan M. Bloch
{"title":"疑似自身免疫性脑炎:对转诊治疗性血浆置换患者的回顾性研究","authors":"Elizabeth P. Crowe,&nbsp;Luisa A. Diaz-Arias,&nbsp;Ralph Habis,&nbsp;Sonja O. Vozniak,&nbsp;Romergryko G. Geocadin,&nbsp;Arun Venkatesan,&nbsp;Aaron A.R. Tobian,&nbsp;John C. Probasco,&nbsp;Evan M. Bloch","doi":"10.1002/jca.22112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) comprises a heterogeneous group of autoantibody-mediated disorders targeting the brain parenchyma. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), one of several first-line therapies for AE, is often initiated when AE is suspected, albeit prior to an established diagnosis. We sought to characterize the role of TPE in the treatment of suspected AE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A single-center, retrospective analysis was performed of adults (≥18 years) who underwent at least one TPE procedure for “suspected AE.” The following parameters were extracted and evaluated descriptively: clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment course, TPE-related adverse events, outcomes (e.g., modified Rankin scale [mRS]), and diagnosis once investigation was complete.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 37 patients (median age 56 years, range 28–77 years, 62.2% male) were evaluated. Autoimmune antibody testing was positive in serum for 43.2% (<i>n</i> = 16) and cerebrospinal fluid for 29.7% (<i>n</i> = 11).</p>\n \n <p>Patients underwent a median of five TPE procedures (range 3–16), with 97.3% (<i>n</i> = 36) via a central line and 21.6% (<i>n</i> = 8) requiring at least one unit of plasma as replacement fluid. Fifteen patients (40.5%) experienced at least one TPE-related adverse event. Compared with mRS at admission, the mRS at discharge was improved in 21.6% (<i>n</i> = 8), unchanged in 59.5% (<i>n</i> = 22), or worse in 18.9% (<i>n</i> = 7). Final diagnosis of AE was determined to be definite in 48.6% (<i>n</i> = 18), probable in 8.1% (<i>n</i> = 3) and possible in 27.0% (<i>n</i> = 10). Six (16.2%) patients were ultimately determined to have an alternate etiology.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Empiric TPE for suspected AE is generally well-tolerated. However, its efficacy remains uncertain in the absence of controlled trials, particularly in the setting of seronegative disease.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"39 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suspected autoimmune encephalitis: A retrospective study of patients referred for therapeutic plasma exchange\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth P. Crowe,&nbsp;Luisa A. Diaz-Arias,&nbsp;Ralph Habis,&nbsp;Sonja O. Vozniak,&nbsp;Romergryko G. Geocadin,&nbsp;Arun Venkatesan,&nbsp;Aaron A.R. Tobian,&nbsp;John C. Probasco,&nbsp;Evan M. Bloch\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jca.22112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) comprises a heterogeneous group of autoantibody-mediated disorders targeting the brain parenchyma. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), one of several first-line therapies for AE, is often initiated when AE is suspected, albeit prior to an established diagnosis. We sought to characterize the role of TPE in the treatment of suspected AE.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A single-center, retrospective analysis was performed of adults (≥18 years) who underwent at least one TPE procedure for “suspected AE.” The following parameters were extracted and evaluated descriptively: clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment course, TPE-related adverse events, outcomes (e.g., modified Rankin scale [mRS]), and diagnosis once investigation was complete.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 37 patients (median age 56 years, range 28–77 years, 62.2% male) were evaluated. Autoimmune antibody testing was positive in serum for 43.2% (<i>n</i> = 16) and cerebrospinal fluid for 29.7% (<i>n</i> = 11).</p>\\n \\n <p>Patients underwent a median of five TPE procedures (range 3–16), with 97.3% (<i>n</i> = 36) via a central line and 21.6% (<i>n</i> = 8) requiring at least one unit of plasma as replacement fluid. Fifteen patients (40.5%) experienced at least one TPE-related adverse event. Compared with mRS at admission, the mRS at discharge was improved in 21.6% (<i>n</i> = 8), unchanged in 59.5% (<i>n</i> = 22), or worse in 18.9% (<i>n</i> = 7). Final diagnosis of AE was determined to be definite in 48.6% (<i>n</i> = 18), probable in 8.1% (<i>n</i> = 3) and possible in 27.0% (<i>n</i> = 10). Six (16.2%) patients were ultimately determined to have an alternate etiology.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Empiric TPE for suspected AE is generally well-tolerated. However, its efficacy remains uncertain in the absence of controlled trials, particularly in the setting of seronegative disease.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Apheresis\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Apheresis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.22112\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.22112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:自身免疫性脑炎(AE)是由自身抗体介导的一组针对脑实质的异质性疾病。治疗性血浆置换术(TPE)是治疗自身免疫性脑炎的几种一线疗法之一,通常在疑似自身免疫性脑炎时启动,尽管是在确诊之前。我们试图描述 TPE 在治疗疑似 AE 中的作用。 方法 我们对因 "疑似 AE "而接受至少一次 TPE 治疗的成人(≥18 岁)进行了单中心回顾性分析。提取并描述性评估了以下参数:临床病理特征、治疗过程、TPE相关不良事件、结果(如改良Rankin量表[mRS])以及调查结束后的诊断。 结果 共评估了 37 名患者(中位年龄 56 岁,年龄范围 28-77 岁,62.2% 为男性)。43.2%(16 人)的患者血清中自身免疫抗体检测呈阳性,29.7%(11 人)的患者脑脊液中自身免疫抗体检测呈阳性。 患者接受了中位数为五次的TPE手术(范围为3-16次),其中97.3%(n = 36)通过中心管路,21.6%(n = 8)需要至少一个单位的血浆作为置换液。15名患者(40.5%)经历了至少一次与TPE相关的不良事件。与入院时的 mRS 相比,出院时 mRS 改善的占 21.6%(8 人),保持不变的占 59.5%(22 人),恶化的占 18.9%(7 人)。最终确诊为 AE 的患者占 48.6%(18 人),可能的占 8.1%(3 人),可能的占 27.0%(10 人)。6名患者(16.2%)最终被确定有其他病因。 结论 对疑似 AE 的经验性 TPE 一般耐受性良好。然而,由于缺乏对照试验,其疗效仍不确定,尤其是在血清阴性疾病的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suspected autoimmune encephalitis: A retrospective study of patients referred for therapeutic plasma exchange

Introduction

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) comprises a heterogeneous group of autoantibody-mediated disorders targeting the brain parenchyma. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), one of several first-line therapies for AE, is often initiated when AE is suspected, albeit prior to an established diagnosis. We sought to characterize the role of TPE in the treatment of suspected AE.

Methods

A single-center, retrospective analysis was performed of adults (≥18 years) who underwent at least one TPE procedure for “suspected AE.” The following parameters were extracted and evaluated descriptively: clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment course, TPE-related adverse events, outcomes (e.g., modified Rankin scale [mRS]), and diagnosis once investigation was complete.

Results

A total of 37 patients (median age 56 years, range 28–77 years, 62.2% male) were evaluated. Autoimmune antibody testing was positive in serum for 43.2% (n = 16) and cerebrospinal fluid for 29.7% (n = 11).

Patients underwent a median of five TPE procedures (range 3–16), with 97.3% (n = 36) via a central line and 21.6% (n = 8) requiring at least one unit of plasma as replacement fluid. Fifteen patients (40.5%) experienced at least one TPE-related adverse event. Compared with mRS at admission, the mRS at discharge was improved in 21.6% (n = 8), unchanged in 59.5% (n = 22), or worse in 18.9% (n = 7). Final diagnosis of AE was determined to be definite in 48.6% (n = 18), probable in 8.1% (n = 3) and possible in 27.0% (n = 10). Six (16.2%) patients were ultimately determined to have an alternate etiology.

Conclusion

Empiric TPE for suspected AE is generally well-tolerated. However, its efficacy remains uncertain in the absence of controlled trials, particularly in the setting of seronegative disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信