面对阿尔茨海默氏症的突破性进展时的失调:临床医生和非专业利益相关者对新出现的改变疾病疗法的接受程度、担忧和支付意愿

Irina Kinchin, Sharon Walsh, Rachel Dinh, Margaret Kapuwa, Sean P. Kennelly, Ann-Marie Miller, Ann Nolan, Sean O'Dowd, Laura O'Philbin, Suzanne Timmons, Iracema Leroi
{"title":"面对阿尔茨海默氏症的突破性进展时的失调:临床医生和非专业利益相关者对新出现的改变疾病疗法的接受程度、担忧和支付意愿","authors":"Irina Kinchin, Sharon Walsh, Rachel Dinh, Margaret Kapuwa, Sean P. Kennelly, Ann-Marie Miller, Ann Nolan, Sean O'Dowd, Laura O'Philbin, Suzanne Timmons, Iracema Leroi","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2024.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>Introducing new disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for Alzheimer's disease demands a fundamental shift in diagnosis and care for most health systems around the world. Understanding the views of health professionals, potential patients, care partners and taxpayers is crucial for service planning and expectation management about these new therapies.</p><span>Aims</span><p>To investigate the public's and professionals’ perspectives regarding (1) acceptability of new DMTs for Alzheimer's disease; (2) perceptions of risk/benefits; (3) the public's willingness to pay (WTP).</p><span>Method</span><p>Informed by the ‘theoretical framework of acceptability’, we conducted two online surveys with 1000 members of the general public and 77 health professionals in Ireland. Descriptive and multivariate regression analyses examined factors associated with DMT acceptance and WTP.</p><span>Results</span><p>Healthcare professionals had a higher acceptance (65%) than the general public (48%). Professionals were more concerned about potential brain bleeds (70%) and efficacy (68%), while the public focused on accessibility and costs. Younger participants (18–24 years) displayed a higher WTP. Education and insurance affected WTP decisions.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>This study exposes complex attitudes toward emerging DMTs for Alzheimer's disease, challenging conventional wisdom in multiple dimensions. A surprising 25% of the public expressed aversion to these new treatments, despite society's deep-rooted fear of dementia in older age. Healthcare professionals displayed nuanced concerns, prioritising clinical effectiveness and potential brain complications. Intriguingly, younger, better-educated and privately insured individuals exhibited a greater WTP, foregrounding critical questions about healthcare equity. These multifaceted findings serve as a guidepost for healthcare strategists, policymakers and ethicists as we edge closer to integrating DMTs into Alzheimer's disease care.</p>","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissonance in the face of Alzheimer's disease breakthroughs: clinician and lay stakeholder acceptance, concerns and willingness to pay for emerging disease-modifying therapies\",\"authors\":\"Irina Kinchin, Sharon Walsh, Rachel Dinh, Margaret Kapuwa, Sean P. Kennelly, Ann-Marie Miller, Ann Nolan, Sean O'Dowd, Laura O'Philbin, Suzanne Timmons, Iracema Leroi\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjp.2024.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span>Background</span><p>Introducing new disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for Alzheimer's disease demands a fundamental shift in diagnosis and care for most health systems around the world. Understanding the views of health professionals, potential patients, care partners and taxpayers is crucial for service planning and expectation management about these new therapies.</p><span>Aims</span><p>To investigate the public's and professionals’ perspectives regarding (1) acceptability of new DMTs for Alzheimer's disease; (2) perceptions of risk/benefits; (3) the public's willingness to pay (WTP).</p><span>Method</span><p>Informed by the ‘theoretical framework of acceptability’, we conducted two online surveys with 1000 members of the general public and 77 health professionals in Ireland. Descriptive and multivariate regression analyses examined factors associated with DMT acceptance and WTP.</p><span>Results</span><p>Healthcare professionals had a higher acceptance (65%) than the general public (48%). Professionals were more concerned about potential brain bleeds (70%) and efficacy (68%), while the public focused on accessibility and costs. Younger participants (18–24 years) displayed a higher WTP. Education and insurance affected WTP decisions.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>This study exposes complex attitudes toward emerging DMTs for Alzheimer's disease, challenging conventional wisdom in multiple dimensions. A surprising 25% of the public expressed aversion to these new treatments, despite society's deep-rooted fear of dementia in older age. Healthcare professionals displayed nuanced concerns, prioritising clinical effectiveness and potential brain complications. Intriguingly, younger, better-educated and privately insured individuals exhibited a greater WTP, foregrounding critical questions about healthcare equity. These multifaceted findings serve as a guidepost for healthcare strategists, policymakers and ethicists as we edge closer to integrating DMTs into Alzheimer's disease care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景针对阿尔茨海默病引入新的改变病情疗法(DMT)要求全球大多数医疗系统在诊断和护理方面做出根本性转变。了解医疗专业人员、潜在患者、护理合作伙伴和纳税人的观点对于这些新疗法的服务规划和期望管理至关重要。方法在 "可接受性理论框架 "的指导下,我们对爱尔兰的 1000 名公众和 77 名医疗专业人员进行了两次在线调查。结果医疗保健专业人员的接受度(65%)高于普通公众(48%)。专业人士更关注潜在的脑出血(70%)和疗效(68%),而公众则关注可及性和成本。较年轻的参与者(18-24 岁)显示出较高的 WTP。这项研究揭示了人们对新出现的治疗阿尔茨海默病的 DMTs 的复杂态度,从多个方面挑战了传统观念。尽管社会对老年痴呆症的恐惧根深蒂固,但竟然有 25% 的公众对这些新疗法表示反感。医疗保健专业人员则表现出细微的担忧,优先考虑临床效果和潜在的脑部并发症。耐人寻味的是,年轻、受教育程度较高和有私人保险的人表现出更大的 WTP,这凸显了有关医疗公平的关键问题。这些多方面的研究结果为医疗保健战略家、政策制定者和伦理学家提供了指导,因为我们离将 DMT 纳入阿尔茨海默氏症护理的目标越来越近了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dissonance in the face of Alzheimer's disease breakthroughs: clinician and lay stakeholder acceptance, concerns and willingness to pay for emerging disease-modifying therapies
Background

Introducing new disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for Alzheimer's disease demands a fundamental shift in diagnosis and care for most health systems around the world. Understanding the views of health professionals, potential patients, care partners and taxpayers is crucial for service planning and expectation management about these new therapies.

Aims

To investigate the public's and professionals’ perspectives regarding (1) acceptability of new DMTs for Alzheimer's disease; (2) perceptions of risk/benefits; (3) the public's willingness to pay (WTP).

Method

Informed by the ‘theoretical framework of acceptability’, we conducted two online surveys with 1000 members of the general public and 77 health professionals in Ireland. Descriptive and multivariate regression analyses examined factors associated with DMT acceptance and WTP.

Results

Healthcare professionals had a higher acceptance (65%) than the general public (48%). Professionals were more concerned about potential brain bleeds (70%) and efficacy (68%), while the public focused on accessibility and costs. Younger participants (18–24 years) displayed a higher WTP. Education and insurance affected WTP decisions.

Conclusions

This study exposes complex attitudes toward emerging DMTs for Alzheimer's disease, challenging conventional wisdom in multiple dimensions. A surprising 25% of the public expressed aversion to these new treatments, despite society's deep-rooted fear of dementia in older age. Healthcare professionals displayed nuanced concerns, prioritising clinical effectiveness and potential brain complications. Intriguingly, younger, better-educated and privately insured individuals exhibited a greater WTP, foregrounding critical questions about healthcare equity. These multifaceted findings serve as a guidepost for healthcare strategists, policymakers and ethicists as we edge closer to integrating DMTs into Alzheimer's disease care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信