评估用于华法林逆转的改良固定剂量四因子凝血酶原复合物浓缩物

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Meghan E. Peterson, Megan P. Jaynes, Sarah Berardi, Colleen Morton
{"title":"评估用于华法林逆转的改良固定剂量四因子凝血酶原复合物浓缩物","authors":"Meghan E. Peterson, Megan P. Jaynes, Sarah Berardi, Colleen Morton","doi":"10.1007/s11239-024-02969-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Non-activated four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4 F-PCC) has emerged as the preferred reversal strategy for patients on warfarin with life-threatening bleeding. Current dosing recommendations for 4 F-PCC require pre-treatment international normalized ratio (INR) and bodyweight values, resulting in ordering and administration delays. Studies have shown that alternative dosing regimens are safe and efficacious. This retrospective, single-center, pre- and post-protocol analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of a pharmacist driven modified fixed-dose 4 F-PCC regimen versus package insert weight- and INR-based dosing regimen for warfarin reversal. The primary outcome was achievement of INR less than two. Secondary outcomes included dose and cost of 4 F-PCC, a time analysis, incidence of concomitant vitamin K administration, and incidence of thrombosis within seven days of 4 F-PCC. There were 195 patients included in the analysis, with 74 in the pre-cohort and 121 in the post-cohort. Baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts with the most common indication for warfarin use being atrial fibrillation (48.6% versus 47.1%) and reversal being intracerebral hemorrhage (68.9% versus 43.0%). Achievement of the primary endpoint occurred in 92% versus 95% (<i>p</i> = 0.097) of patients. A statistically significant difference was seen between cohorts regarding median dose and cost of 4 F-PCC administered (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Eleven thromboembolic events occurred with three events in the pre-cohort and eight events in the post-cohort (<i>p</i> = 0.453). A fixed-dose of 1500IU of 4 F-PCC was effective in reversing INR to less than two in most patients regardless of reversal indication with minimal thrombotic risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of modified fixed dose four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for warfarin reversal\",\"authors\":\"Meghan E. Peterson, Megan P. Jaynes, Sarah Berardi, Colleen Morton\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11239-024-02969-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Non-activated four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4 F-PCC) has emerged as the preferred reversal strategy for patients on warfarin with life-threatening bleeding. Current dosing recommendations for 4 F-PCC require pre-treatment international normalized ratio (INR) and bodyweight values, resulting in ordering and administration delays. Studies have shown that alternative dosing regimens are safe and efficacious. This retrospective, single-center, pre- and post-protocol analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of a pharmacist driven modified fixed-dose 4 F-PCC regimen versus package insert weight- and INR-based dosing regimen for warfarin reversal. The primary outcome was achievement of INR less than two. Secondary outcomes included dose and cost of 4 F-PCC, a time analysis, incidence of concomitant vitamin K administration, and incidence of thrombosis within seven days of 4 F-PCC. There were 195 patients included in the analysis, with 74 in the pre-cohort and 121 in the post-cohort. Baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts with the most common indication for warfarin use being atrial fibrillation (48.6% versus 47.1%) and reversal being intracerebral hemorrhage (68.9% versus 43.0%). Achievement of the primary endpoint occurred in 92% versus 95% (<i>p</i> = 0.097) of patients. A statistically significant difference was seen between cohorts regarding median dose and cost of 4 F-PCC administered (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Eleven thromboembolic events occurred with three events in the pre-cohort and eight events in the post-cohort (<i>p</i> = 0.453). A fixed-dose of 1500IU of 4 F-PCC was effective in reversing INR to less than two in most patients regardless of reversal indication with minimal thrombotic risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-02969-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-02969-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非活性四因子凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(4 F-PCC)已成为服用华法林并有生命危险的出血患者的首选逆转策略。目前 4 F-PCC 的剂量建议需要治疗前的国际标准化比值(INR)和体重值,这导致了订购和用药延迟。研究表明,替代给药方案既安全又有效。这项回顾性、单中心、协议前后分析旨在评估药剂师驱动的改良固定剂量 4 F-PCC 方案与基于包装上的体重和 INR 的华法林逆转给药方案的疗效。主要结果是 INR 小于 2。次要结果包括 4 F-PCC 的剂量和成本、时间分析、同时服用维生素 K 的发生率以及 4 F-PCC 七天内血栓形成的发生率。共有 195 名患者纳入分析,其中前队列 74 人,后队列 121 人。两组患者的基线特征相似,使用华法林最常见的适应症是心房颤动(48.6% 对 47.1%),逆转适应症是脑出血(68.9% 对 43.0%)。达到主要终点的患者比例为 92% 对 95%(P = 0.097)。两组患者在 4 F-PCC 的中位剂量和费用方面存在显著统计学差异(p = 0.001)。共发生了 11 起血栓栓塞事件,队列前发生了 3 起,队列后发生了 8 起(p = 0.453)。无论逆转指征如何,固定剂量的 1500IU 4 F-PCC 都能有效地将大多数患者的 INR 逆转至 2 以下,而且血栓风险极低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of modified fixed dose four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for warfarin reversal

Evaluation of modified fixed dose four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for warfarin reversal

Non-activated four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4 F-PCC) has emerged as the preferred reversal strategy for patients on warfarin with life-threatening bleeding. Current dosing recommendations for 4 F-PCC require pre-treatment international normalized ratio (INR) and bodyweight values, resulting in ordering and administration delays. Studies have shown that alternative dosing regimens are safe and efficacious. This retrospective, single-center, pre- and post-protocol analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of a pharmacist driven modified fixed-dose 4 F-PCC regimen versus package insert weight- and INR-based dosing regimen for warfarin reversal. The primary outcome was achievement of INR less than two. Secondary outcomes included dose and cost of 4 F-PCC, a time analysis, incidence of concomitant vitamin K administration, and incidence of thrombosis within seven days of 4 F-PCC. There were 195 patients included in the analysis, with 74 in the pre-cohort and 121 in the post-cohort. Baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts with the most common indication for warfarin use being atrial fibrillation (48.6% versus 47.1%) and reversal being intracerebral hemorrhage (68.9% versus 43.0%). Achievement of the primary endpoint occurred in 92% versus 95% (p = 0.097) of patients. A statistically significant difference was seen between cohorts regarding median dose and cost of 4 F-PCC administered (p < 0.001). Eleven thromboembolic events occurred with three events in the pre-cohort and eight events in the post-cohort (p = 0.453). A fixed-dose of 1500IU of 4 F-PCC was effective in reversing INR to less than two in most patients regardless of reversal indication with minimal thrombotic risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care. The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信