{"title":"泰语版《护理人员对慢性病自我护理的贡献量表》(第 2 版)的心理测试","authors":"Wanna Kumanjan MNS, RN, APN, Jom Suwanno PhD, RN, FHEA, Naruebeth Koson MNS, RN, Chonchanok Bunsuk MNS, RN, FHEA, Nuntaporn Klinjun PhD, RN, FHEA, Kannika Srisomthrong MNS, RN, FHEA, Chennet Phonphet PhD, RN, APN, SFHEA, Chidchanog Mayurapak PhD, RN, FHEA, Chutiporn Dansuwan MNS, RN, Juk Suwanno MNS, RN, APN, Punnaphat Chramnanpho MNS, RN, FHEA, Umaporn Kamlungdee MNS, RN, APN, Wichai Arab MNS, RN, Putrada Ninla-aesong PhD, FHEA, Sadee Saithong Hamilton PhD, RN, Ladda Thiamwong PhD, RN, FAAN","doi":"10.1111/ijn.13258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the psychometric properties of the Thai version of Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory version 2 (CC-SC-CII-v2) among primary caregivers of individuals with any single or multiple chronic illnesses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The instrument encompasses three scales that evaluate Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care (CC-SC) Maintenance, Monitoring and Management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The English version CC-SC-CII-v2 was translated and adapted for Thai context, and a cross-sectional multicenter study involved 430 caregivers from 16 primary care centres in Thailand. Structural validity, internal consistency reliability and test–retest reliability were examined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The original two-factor CC-SC Maintenance scale required a re-specified model for good fit, while the CC-SC Monitoring and CC-SC Management scales fit well. The simultaneous model of three scales demonstrated satisfactory fit. The CC-SC Maintenance and CC-SC Management scales both had a composite reliability index of 0.85, with omega coefficients of 0.86 and 0.83, respectively. CC-SC Monitoring had an alpha coefficient of 0.89. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.84 to 0.91, indicating good test–retest reliability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The Thai CC-SC-CII-v2 is a valid and reliable instrument that can provide clinicians and investigators with an evaluation of the contributions of caregivers to the self-care of patients with chronic illnesses.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"30 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric testing of the Thai version of Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory version 2\",\"authors\":\"Wanna Kumanjan MNS, RN, APN, Jom Suwanno PhD, RN, FHEA, Naruebeth Koson MNS, RN, Chonchanok Bunsuk MNS, RN, FHEA, Nuntaporn Klinjun PhD, RN, FHEA, Kannika Srisomthrong MNS, RN, FHEA, Chennet Phonphet PhD, RN, APN, SFHEA, Chidchanog Mayurapak PhD, RN, FHEA, Chutiporn Dansuwan MNS, RN, Juk Suwanno MNS, RN, APN, Punnaphat Chramnanpho MNS, RN, FHEA, Umaporn Kamlungdee MNS, RN, APN, Wichai Arab MNS, RN, Putrada Ninla-aesong PhD, FHEA, Sadee Saithong Hamilton PhD, RN, Ladda Thiamwong PhD, RN, FAAN\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijn.13258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the psychometric properties of the Thai version of Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory version 2 (CC-SC-CII-v2) among primary caregivers of individuals with any single or multiple chronic illnesses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The instrument encompasses three scales that evaluate Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care (CC-SC) Maintenance, Monitoring and Management.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The English version CC-SC-CII-v2 was translated and adapted for Thai context, and a cross-sectional multicenter study involved 430 caregivers from 16 primary care centres in Thailand. Structural validity, internal consistency reliability and test–retest reliability were examined.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The original two-factor CC-SC Maintenance scale required a re-specified model for good fit, while the CC-SC Monitoring and CC-SC Management scales fit well. The simultaneous model of three scales demonstrated satisfactory fit. The CC-SC Maintenance and CC-SC Management scales both had a composite reliability index of 0.85, with omega coefficients of 0.86 and 0.83, respectively. CC-SC Monitoring had an alpha coefficient of 0.89. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.84 to 0.91, indicating good test–retest reliability.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Thai CC-SC-CII-v2 is a valid and reliable instrument that can provide clinicians and investigators with an evaluation of the contributions of caregivers to the self-care of patients with chronic illnesses.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.13258\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.13258","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Psychometric testing of the Thai version of Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory version 2
Aim
To assess the psychometric properties of the Thai version of Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory version 2 (CC-SC-CII-v2) among primary caregivers of individuals with any single or multiple chronic illnesses.
Background
The instrument encompasses three scales that evaluate Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care (CC-SC) Maintenance, Monitoring and Management.
Methods
The English version CC-SC-CII-v2 was translated and adapted for Thai context, and a cross-sectional multicenter study involved 430 caregivers from 16 primary care centres in Thailand. Structural validity, internal consistency reliability and test–retest reliability were examined.
Results
The original two-factor CC-SC Maintenance scale required a re-specified model for good fit, while the CC-SC Monitoring and CC-SC Management scales fit well. The simultaneous model of three scales demonstrated satisfactory fit. The CC-SC Maintenance and CC-SC Management scales both had a composite reliability index of 0.85, with omega coefficients of 0.86 and 0.83, respectively. CC-SC Monitoring had an alpha coefficient of 0.89. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.84 to 0.91, indicating good test–retest reliability.
Conclusion
The Thai CC-SC-CII-v2 is a valid and reliable instrument that can provide clinicians and investigators with an evaluation of the contributions of caregivers to the self-care of patients with chronic illnesses.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.