大气模型在山区是否太冷?科学现状和 SAIL 实地考察的启示

IF 6.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
William Rudisill, Alan Rhoades, Zexuan Xu, Daniel R. Feldman
{"title":"大气模型在山区是否太冷?科学现状和 SAIL 实地考察的启示","authors":"William Rudisill, Alan Rhoades, Zexuan Xu, Daniel R. Feldman","doi":"10.1175/bams-d-23-0082.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Mountains play an outsized role for water resource availability, and the amount and timing of water they provide depends strongly on temperature. To that end, we ask: how well are atmospheric models capturing mountain temperatures? We synthesize results showing that high resolution, regionally relevant climate models produce two-meter air temperatures (T2m) colder than what is observed (a “cold bias”), particularly in snow-covered mid-latitude mountain ranges during winter. We find common cold biases in 44 studies across global mountain ranges, including single-model and multi-model ensembles. We explore the factors driving these biases and examine the physical mechanisms, data limitations, and observational uncertainties behind T2m. Our analysis suggests that the biases are genuine and not due to observation sparsity or resolution mismatches. Cold biases occur primarily on mountain peaks and ridges, whereas valleys are often warm biased. Our literature review suggests that increasing model resolution does not clearly mitigate the bias. By analyzing data from the SAIL field campaign in the Colorado Rocky Mountains, we test various hypotheses related to cold biases, and find that local wind circulations, longwave radiation, and surface-layer parameterizations contribute to the T2m biases in this particular location. We conclude by emphasizing the value of coordinated model evaluation and development efforts in heavily instrumented mountain locations for addressing the root cause(s) of T2m biases and improving predictive understanding of mountain climates.","PeriodicalId":9464,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society","volume":"300 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are atmospheric models too cold in the mountains? The state of science and insights from the SAIL field campaign\",\"authors\":\"William Rudisill, Alan Rhoades, Zexuan Xu, Daniel R. Feldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/bams-d-23-0082.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Mountains play an outsized role for water resource availability, and the amount and timing of water they provide depends strongly on temperature. To that end, we ask: how well are atmospheric models capturing mountain temperatures? We synthesize results showing that high resolution, regionally relevant climate models produce two-meter air temperatures (T2m) colder than what is observed (a “cold bias”), particularly in snow-covered mid-latitude mountain ranges during winter. We find common cold biases in 44 studies across global mountain ranges, including single-model and multi-model ensembles. We explore the factors driving these biases and examine the physical mechanisms, data limitations, and observational uncertainties behind T2m. Our analysis suggests that the biases are genuine and not due to observation sparsity or resolution mismatches. Cold biases occur primarily on mountain peaks and ridges, whereas valleys are often warm biased. Our literature review suggests that increasing model resolution does not clearly mitigate the bias. By analyzing data from the SAIL field campaign in the Colorado Rocky Mountains, we test various hypotheses related to cold biases, and find that local wind circulations, longwave radiation, and surface-layer parameterizations contribute to the T2m biases in this particular location. We conclude by emphasizing the value of coordinated model evaluation and development efforts in heavily instrumented mountain locations for addressing the root cause(s) of T2m biases and improving predictive understanding of mountain climates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society\",\"volume\":\"300 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-23-0082.1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-23-0082.1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 山区在水资源可用性方面发挥着重要作用,而它们提供的水量和时间在很大程度上取决于温度。为此,我们要问:大气模型对山区温度的捕捉效果如何?我们的研究结果表明,高分辨率、与区域相关的气候模式产生的两米气温(T2m)比观测到的气温要低("冷偏差"),尤其是在冬季白雪覆盖的中纬度山脉。我们在全球山脉的 44 项研究中发现了共同的寒冷偏差,包括单一模式和多模式集合。我们探讨了驱动这些偏差的因素,并研究了 T2m 背后的物理机制、数据限制和观测不确定性。我们的分析表明,这些偏差是真实存在的,而不是由于观测数据稀少或分辨率不匹配造成的。冷偏差主要出现在山峰和山脊上,而山谷通常有暖偏差。我们的文献综述表明,提高模式分辨率并不能明显减轻偏差。通过分析科罗拉多落基山脉 SAIL 野外活动的数据,我们检验了与冷偏差有关的各种假设,发现当地风环流、长波辐射和表层参数化导致了这一特定地点的 T2m 偏差。最后,我们强调了在有大量仪器的山区协调模型评估和开发工作的价值,以解决 T2m 偏差的根本原因,提高对山区气候的预测理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are atmospheric models too cold in the mountains? The state of science and insights from the SAIL field campaign
Abstract Mountains play an outsized role for water resource availability, and the amount and timing of water they provide depends strongly on temperature. To that end, we ask: how well are atmospheric models capturing mountain temperatures? We synthesize results showing that high resolution, regionally relevant climate models produce two-meter air temperatures (T2m) colder than what is observed (a “cold bias”), particularly in snow-covered mid-latitude mountain ranges during winter. We find common cold biases in 44 studies across global mountain ranges, including single-model and multi-model ensembles. We explore the factors driving these biases and examine the physical mechanisms, data limitations, and observational uncertainties behind T2m. Our analysis suggests that the biases are genuine and not due to observation sparsity or resolution mismatches. Cold biases occur primarily on mountain peaks and ridges, whereas valleys are often warm biased. Our literature review suggests that increasing model resolution does not clearly mitigate the bias. By analyzing data from the SAIL field campaign in the Colorado Rocky Mountains, we test various hypotheses related to cold biases, and find that local wind circulations, longwave radiation, and surface-layer parameterizations contribute to the T2m biases in this particular location. We conclude by emphasizing the value of coordinated model evaluation and development efforts in heavily instrumented mountain locations for addressing the root cause(s) of T2m biases and improving predictive understanding of mountain climates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (BAMS) is the flagship magazine of AMS and publishes articles of interest and significance for the weather, water, and climate community as well as news, editorials, and reviews for AMS members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信